Recent content by CrazyFoxBrawler

BH, I totally agree about the kitchens and the people watching. That really is an extra special shoutout. Great tournament!

You are perfectly correct if I was talking about OS as a person, but I wasnt. I was rather talking about how the message was conveyed over a message board. It was not a personal attack. To me, it seems as if people are focusing more on the logistics of the circuit, than the actual game. When...

I think that was very reasonable. Let productive discussion ensue!

Why not a combined effort of Panda and OS? That seems viable.

There in lies the problem. You can be both a good organizer, and have people like you. The Kishes did that pretty well.

Agreed. The organization is there, no doubt. But if you came off in a more people-friendly way, there would be no arguement. Let's be honest here. They are provoking just as much arguing as you are. If you just said that there rants were unneccassary, they would look like a fool.

The real issue is not whether or not OS can run a good tournament or not, because I am sure he can. It is more the idea that he comes off as a complete d-bag that has people upset. He has a very superior attitude. And the question is then does that make the tournament any less enjoyable?

I'll be in if I can go to Nick's with my Wii and such. My DSL is fail.

Big C makes a point. But everyone should stop fighting.

Again, I just want to reiterate that I have no preference on the stages. I am just pointing out the numbers. But now I understand what you are saying. So did BH and the others figure it out yet?

Onett definitely was banned... Even by the SBR. Mario circuit only had 56% of the vote for CP. Skyworld had 60% for CP. Green Greens had 47.6% for CP. PTAD had 46.4% for CP. None of those are 2/3. The numbers dont lie.

Oh my goodness, you are thinking to hard. I was replying to Dastrn, and then Ankoku posted, and I edited thanking him. I was not asking Ankoku to elaborate. He cleared everything up.

Please elaborate. Why would some stages be banned, but not others, when it is already liberal. (And not complaining here, just trying to understand the thought process.) Okay, thanks that cleared it up. A lot more than saying I am in over my head.

By the arguement that there is no reason to ban certain stages, then it can also be argued that no stages should be banned as they all are playable. Yes, some people have advantages on certain stages, but that can be said about any stage. So why ban some, but not others??

The point here is not about whether planking is gay, or if someone thinks a stage is gay, it is the question of whether the technique and stages are legit. Now I do not know near enough about the stages, but on the subject of planking I have a thought. Every sport has some sort of way to...