#HBC | ѕoup
The world is not beautiful, therefore it is.
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2010
- Messages
- 6,865
His responses looked more agressive town, thus I made a case, I've been over this, gandhi ;D
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
i differ from you in this thought. i'm skeptical of everyone at the start and assume them all to be possibly scum, not friend(town). in order for me to see someone as other wise, i need a reason for it. i figure if coasting is scum's best tactic, those who coast will get left at the bottom for sure, and anyone that has scummy play will be right along there with them.109 also reeks of unwarranted pressure
Unless proven wrong we assume them to be friend!
Rereading makes my visions become fresher
And the evil within the chosen I can sense again
What case? What are you talking about?His responses looked more agressive town, thus I made a case, I've been over this, gandhi ;D
Congratulations. You've blown the whole thing wide open. Aye, it was all part of my diabolical scheme, as I cleverly pretended to not catch what had transpired to divert attention from the game's first hard evidence, which I said in my own words "changes the ball game". And it seemed like such a good ruse, to fake a misunderstanding of what was actually embarrassingly obvious.i think i'm more inclined to believe Washscum rather than Afroscum, so i'm interested to hear your case J.
EE's posts regarding last nights deaths were weird to me honestly. especially with asking what happened with Ran, iunno just seemed fake and like just trying to create an easy topic to get onto/take the focus off of the flips of the people who died last night.
Really though, what the hell are you talking about? Who's "people" here? Who's "you"? Is that supposed to be Gandhi and Jerkus, respectively? Because if so that's some hyperbolic bull **** right there friendoWash said:Alright, I dunno what I can say to any of that. People bring up hardcore evidence to disbelieve you and you still chalk it up to your agenda? I'm not sure what I could say at all to anything you suggest.
Really? This, coming from the guy whose first post of the game was this?EE's posts regarding last nights deaths were weird to me honestly. especially with asking what happened with Ran, iunno just seemed fake and like just trying to create an easy topic to get onto/take the focus off of the flips of the people who died last night.
Why? Skepticism is fine, but why would you assume guilt and then look for proof of innocence? By design, most of the people in this game are town. Treating everyone as scum and working backwards to find the ones that actually aren't is so much more work for no reason. Be skeptical of your reads; reevaluate them from time to time, sure. But you have to be able to trust some people some of the time.i differ from you in this thought. i'm skeptical of everyone at the start and assume them all to be possibly scum, not friend(town). in order for me to see someone as other wise, i need a reason for it.
So why was it on Axel to show his reasons first?i differ from you in this thought. i'm skeptical of everyone at the start and assume them all to be possibly scum, not friend(town). in order for me to see someone as other wise, i need a reason for it. i figure if coasting is scum's best tactic, those who coast will get left at the bottom for sure, and anyone that has scummy play will be right along there with them.
ohReally though, what the hell are you talking about? Who's "people" here? Who's "you"? Is that supposed to be Gandhi and Jerkus, respectively? Because if so that's some hyperbolic bull **** right there friendo
Yes, I take issue with it. I take issue with the concept of "seeking townie points." It comes off as a bull**** tell if you can (read: key word here) sit here and essentially twist things happening to fit the concept of it in order to further your case. It seems like you've twisted a lot of things I've done from the end of the Gorf wagon to now to fit this "seeking town points" point and I can't really say a damn word about it because it's such a malleable thing.Hardcore evidence? Like retroactively claiming to not want to put Gord at L-1 yesterDay clears you or something? Get outta here with that garbage.
If you can't defend yourself, you can't defend yourself; don't try to dress it up. Do you take issue with the conclusion I'm drawing from the last post I quoted from you? If so, fight me on it. Make me believe you.
you gotta start somewhere. to my memory, ryker was the first to toss the vote who's flipped town now. do you really think it was some elaborate plan thought up by scum? if i was scum, would i really have had time to discuss with them between when ryker tossed his vote on him and whenever i cast my vote? come on now.So why was it on Axel to show his reasons first?
What were yours to choose him before the others?
Did you actually think that among us he's the worst?
Or were you just told to do it by your evil brothers?!
I believe not a word you say unless you can show me your explanation
On why you'd vote him over anybody else without the slightest hesitation!
Yes? I don't see the connection between these two honestly. The contexts are vastly different.Really? This, coming from the guy whose first post of the game was this?
I assume this caz this is what made sense to me when i first played the game. This is also why i dislike all the "holding hands" stuff, like its to easy for scum to get away with something like that i feel.Why? Skepticism is fine, but why would you assume guilt and then look for proof of innocence? By design, most of the people in this game are town. Treating everyone as scum and working backwards to find the ones that actually aren't is so much more work for no reason. Be skeptical of your reads; reevaluate them from time to time, sure. But you have to be able to trust some people some of the time.
Washed, this vote looks hella scummy to me. What are your similar questions? What's been keeping you from asking them?I think I understand what Gheb's up to here. Coincidentally enough, I had similar questions for Choice in hindsight.
vote: Choice
If you were in on it? Yes. I know why Ryker and Gheb started it, I know why they did it--it was actually a plan they had had since before they all switched from LoTR mafia, so it's not indictive to their alignment. Saying "If I were scum with them" is also a terrible thing because it's a void point now. Derp.you gotta start somewhere. to my memory, ryker was the first to toss the vote who's flipped town now. do you really think it was some elaborate plan thought up by scum? if i was scum, would i really have had time to discuss with them between when ryker tossed his vote on him and whenever i cast my vote? come on now.
why the **** would you say this **** yet not have a vote on him? dumb.were you told by your evil brothers to throw down that vote and make up that vision crap?
as the wagon went along i did think he was the scummiest, but then nothing was really happening with that wagon/no information was being gotten and it'd be a waste of time to just spend the day banging our heads against a wall of "i dont know what i should say to defend myself" instead of investigating other people.
I just explained that a few posts up as well as your statement following that one.Mainly the fact that you went after Axel primarily. Gheb, Ryker, Gorf, EE, and I all had a common reason to vote Axel and we all knew it. You didn't. I'm suspicious of your smooth attempt at joining the bandwagon and Gheb brings up a fair point that I considered in my reread--why did you join the Axel wagon? Your comments of "everyone is scum till proven town" make me question why you went after him first. The logical--and most obvious/simple answer (Occam's Razor)--suggests ease.
What i mean is how come you didnt ask prior to gheb? it just seems like an empty claim to me. i'm not asking you to answer my questions for me or something, i already responded to them. why are you saying that you're not giving away answers?And I didn't ask them because Gheb had similar questions and I wasn't going to make the question redundant/useless. I'm not giving away answers, Choice.
caz its rhetorical. in case you missed it, i'm expressing that Gheb's questions could just as well apply to him. you guys discussed some plan before the game started and so now you're all free of it but anyone else who does similarly is scum? does this really make sense to you?why the **** would you say this **** yet not have a vote on him? dumb.
Town or not didn't like is play. Him being mason lovers with Ryker would answer somethings about them and some more questions I have. Washed is one of my first to look at right now. Ryker seemed gun ho for WL, J, and myself.@RR: You were all over some Ranmaru yesterday. What do you think of his flip? What does that change for you?
What's your game plan for today? Put on your captain hat.
J, if you're going to push for Afro toDay, you better start building a case.
Why not say things unprovoked? Nope, I have some reads that I have that need more development.What is the point of saying these things unprovoked? Also, is this what you consider "keeping things close to the chest?"
Vote: Washed
I will see that one dead toDay, hell or high water. Get back to bussing J, buddy.
I am kind of surprised there's actually a killing role other than the mafia in this game though....
Your opinion vs. My opinionChainsaw is not WIFOM, chainsaw defence is a solid tell when the chainsawed one flips scum. Why are you even trying to debate this?
I ask people to read my defenses and people say no, so I make them a condensed version of everything. Don't talk to me about re-reading/doing extra stuff. Also I asked you that because when I did re-read I didn't see anything beneficial and that post was over 1,000 posts ago. That's not explanation of your updated views.WL read[/URL]
Wait, so that's everything you are substantiating your reads of Choice/Circus? Something about 1,000 posts ago?Afro said:Cricus & Choice:
At your Gheb question, even I know you are making that up because he never said that.Afro said:@Gheb: What happened to the conviction of Choicescum if Gord town? Do you still stick to that?
@Soup: I'll do a re-skim to decide between J/Choice/WL but I'm pretty confident its J still. Might even ask the hairy one what he thinks, I'm kinda thrown since most of the people on the Gord wagon I was kinda fine with :/
Yet, you are willing to follow someone who hasn't presented a case himself but ask for me to bring one. Why haven't you done any scum-hunting yourself/pursue who you think is scum OR do something that isn't following the mainstream of the game. This is just another example of you being a parasite to others reads.i think i'm more inclined to believe Washscum rather than Afroscum, so i'm interested to hear your case J.
The Circus Clown is a fellow of possible danger!EE/Gheb, tell me why you like Circus again and what is your current read on him?
Choice of course, but i'm also looking at RR now, i don't like this post:Soupa, Choice or Afro?
This paragraph here is evidently useless and it looks more like a pretend reason, sure, he says "yep guys i'm gonna scumhunt lol" but all the while it states the obvious and is somewhat selective with what he says, for example, my bolded. his only focus are the main two figures of interest right now, he lacks effort, and therefore i'm gonna see if this type of style commits to what else he has done, and to be honest, not much, as i re-call.Town or not didn't like is play. Him being mason lovers with Ryker would answer somethings about them and some more questions I have. Washed is one of my first to look at right now. Ryker seemed gun ho for WL, J, and myself.
This changes my look at the players left, two of my scum picks died, one was Gord yesterday and Shin was another. With Ryker and Ran gone it means I need to look at clashes between them and other players, a lot of connection have been shown now, and there is more to work with.
My game plan is to figure out what leads we have and to go from there. So far, WL and Afro are my focus, right now I gotta sleep so I shall pursue these another time. I wish I had a captain hat. :<
I didn't redirect anything. I asked you to give me something to look at regarding Afro completely independently of anything else.Circus, the reason of difference is huge, you've been calling Washed scum this entire game. Without a single case. Shouldn't you already have one if you are so sure you come into toDay just voting him?
Also random? How about you read twilight before the flip. And I'm not holding it hostage, but it's not the right time.
I'm asking you since you are sooooo sure on Washed scum, where is your case on him? Instead you try and re-direct it to me about Afro.
I didn't ask them prior to Gheb because I was rereading things at that point (mostly the Axel wagon as I was rechecking my stance on it) and the thought of you joining it made me entirely cautious. I withheld once I noticed what Gheb was asking. I didn't add onto it because I didn't want to influence how you answered.I just explained that a few posts up as well as your statement following that one.
What i mean is how come you didnt ask prior to gheb? it just seems like an empty claim to me. i'm not asking you to answer my questions for me or something, i already responded to them. why are you saying that you're not giving away answers?