Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
someonE who didn't Just Want to be incLuded In the RanKings, it shouLdn't be too hard to figure out who thAt iS.Willz Says:
who the **** is mystery player lol
You were incredibly slow to update it, especially for such a small community.The tourney was only 11 days ago. It was last updated just over 3 weeks ago. I wouldn't say I am slow to update.
Fair enough.Oh and because I haven't finished programming a tool to do the updates automatically for me, I have to do them manually in Excel, and its far from the simplicity of most PRs so it takes more work.
When you actually have the skill level to judge good players from the bad, I'll listen to these claims.The system isn't bad. Your region is bad.
Individual tournaments? You're system goes against the very thing that you said wouldn't effect it, to quote you in your original post:Most people are asking me how the results work out like this, and how 'so-and-so' gained so many points, basically saying that it doesn't make sense. Well, there are two reasons for this.
1. The system is designed to be very dynamic. Rather than simply let players stock up a bunch of points from previous tourneys, it tries to track where a player is currently. So individual tournaments often do have a much greater effect on points than they would under a more traditional (and imo less accurate) system.
Now note this, because I'll be coming back to this later on.# Not allow 'having a bad day' or 'getting lucky in brackets' to drastically effect a players position.
They would have the exact same effect regardless of frequency. It's the same tournament, the same players and the same characters, it's just being played at different rates. At some point or another, the exact values you have up there will be IDENTICAL to the ones at that point in time.2. Despite this, I will admit that individual tourneys do have a bit too much of an effect, this is because of how infrequent the tourneys in the UK are. Before this one, the last tourney was in June. Player's ability can change a lot in the time between June and September, the system is designed to that that into account.
I am currently in the process of tweaking some bits of the formula which will make it more relevant to the UK and more accurate in general. So when I am done, the points will change to better reflect individual skill.
Okay, now to bring up that quote from earlier:If you are wondering why certain players are placed where they are... try actually reading some of it. Because of the way it works, things that wouldn't usually happen in a PR system are able to happen, such as KJ moving up a spot without even attending. This kind of thing is supposed to happen, its what makes the system more dynamic and accurate.
Also, don't just look at points... you see that number there called Accuracy Value? That represents (prepare yourself for this one...) how accurate your ranking is! So if a player has a lower accuracy value, their points are potentially less accurate to their actual skill. Also, if a player seems to have gained or lost a lot of points in one tournament, it was probably because they had a low accuracy value.
An example I'll give: Cong. Cong attended this tournament, and instead of his usual top 5 placing, he had a bad day, yet his accuracy value is quite high and somehow he managed to drop a ridiculous amount of positions. Now look at the bolded section of that quote I made of yours, position. Position to anybody means where they are placed within this list. Not accuracy values, but their actual placement on this list. The same goes for Cloud (no offense), but he got an easier bracket then most of the people at this tournament, and yet his position skyrockets, once again, with a good accuracy rating, so you're now saying that because of a single good placement despite getting 9th at GT2, Cloud deserves a placement of 6th on this list? That makes absolutely no sense.# Not allow 'having a bad day' or 'getting lucky in brackets' to drastically effect a players position.
Preferably under a more accurate system then this.I am also going to be adding the ability to do MM's for points soon.
Yet you still call this region bad when you're doing literally nothing to help it.Oh, and sorry for not actually attending the tournament myself, I am extremely disappointed to have not been able to go.
yes i'm very serious lol@ Willz: If you are serious about going all Falcon, I'll take Falco off next tourney. Awesome that you are going all Falcon man, I hope you do well with him. =)
IF you think 11 days is slow, then fine. Updates would be quicker in future.You were incredibly slow to update it, especially for such a small community.
Because skill is what is required for judgement? I see. Also, you have completely mistaken my meaning, I wasn't commenting on the skill of players in the UK, I was referring to how active the UK is.When you actually have the skill level to judge good players from the bad, I'll listen to these claims.
You assume that those players have a high accuracy value. They don't, no one in the UK does. I realise after this update that the current way it is set-up isn't working for the UK, and I said I was tweaking it.Individual tournaments? You're system goes against the very thing that you said wouldn't effect it, to quote you in your original post:
An example I'll give: Cong. Cong attended this tournament, and instead of his usual top 5 placing, he had a bad day, yet his accuracy value is quite high and somehow he managed to drop a ridiculous amount of positions. Now look at the bolded section of that quote I made of yours, position. Position to anybody means where they are placed within this list. Not accuracy values, but their actual placement on this list. The same goes for Cloud (no offense), but he got an easier bracket then most of the people at this tournament, and yet his position skyrockets, once again, with a good accuracy rating, so you're now saying that because of a single good placement despite getting 9th at GT2, Cloud deserves a placement of 6th on this list? That makes absolutely no sense.
As I have said before, it doesn't work unless every player is on it. But don't worry, everyone shall be removed. I am taking it down, its clearly not serving any purpose.Edit: Also, as previously requested, please remove me from that list.