Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yes
You never asked me that, but yes I agree with Nich's push on you and I agree with Kat's recent #2719. I also agree with what July has said to you as well. I admit I haven't read the last few walls between you and Nich, but I agree with his point that you haven't really shown genuine scum hunting. You've asked questions and given reads, but a lot of the time your reads don't line up with what you're actually doing.
By the bolded, you mean specifically that you don't like my reasoning for SK, or are there other things as well? What don't you agree with in my SK reasoning?
I'm a couple votes from being lynched; if my plan is supposed to be playing like scumOS, I'm doing a pretty terrible job.
It's the wording. The phrase "but it's all I have" is a justification of "I know it's pretty weak". It suggests that you wish you had more, which would be the case if you wanted to convince someone I'm scum. The phrase in its entirety suggests that you feel you have to justify a scum read on me.
No idea what you mean by references. Sit tight though, I have a post for you.
I disagree, because I think the victim might crumb. The victim might crumb to draw doc, or to legitimize themselves later in any event where that becomes necessary (lylo where killer cc's victim, or in event of a lynch). If they didn't realize they were a killer target prior to Grey's claim, they might not have had anything to crumb at all i.e. they're a VT, although it's also possible that they would be a PR who didn't think it necessary to crumb prior to realizing vic status.^a lot of this is irrelevant to what our analogy insists
Because the killer would be interested in looking like a) or b).
"Nothing I can remember" --> because your posts aren't memorable. I can't quote an entire game of posts and say "this proves that his posts aren't memorable" but that doesn't make it less of a point. If I were forming a case against you, I would be forced to ISO and prove that point -- right now we're talking about my reads, not a case, and you're tossing it to the side because it's a little nebulous. Meanwhile you're focusing on this page 4 point, and suggesting it's the sole factor in my read when it isn't.Wii don't think you should beTHATvilified - you described us as scummy/garbage etc... accusatory words -> when wii analysed in finer details, this looked to be based on a single event from page 4 with a side salad of nothing else you can remember. Can you see why wii're concerned? The read looks too quaint amongst hundreds of other actions left to analyse, which are dumped as null and in the void. You're proving yourself either lazy or in need of talking drivel
You have to be ****ing kidding me. I bring this up most recently in 2709 (a post containing a whole list of posts that need a response from you), and in other posts as well. It's 2312.
Wording mixup can be explained by two-heads, Grey retracting the gov ability has a potential town explanation in that he wanted to protect VG i.e. what Grey has already said, looking for the crumb as I've said is something I believe is viable as well. All of that is null, like the rest of Grey's claim: he can offer explanations for problems, regardless of whether or not the explanations are valid. You haven't offered explanations for the problems I have your claim, nor could you; the ability-naming is obviously unexplainable, and Swiss suggests that you've never played Ocarina of Time and shouldn't have had reason to confuse OoT with LoZ. That's not null like Grey's is, thus your claim is worse on the face.
"Know It All" --> OS-style name"It feels like an OS role" though --> when you sleep tonight, suffocate yourself
oko i was talking moreso about having doubts than defences, which all quotes exhibit. Maybe you skimmed, again, bahaha
ok
ok
You. =/ What kind of question is this?
It was a combination of this, and them pushing that Grey could only be doing X when he clearly could also be doing Y.I would too, actually, but not based on the disagreement. Still, what about their disagreement made you feel certain in your decision to fry them?
one sec
http://www.smashboards.com/showpost.php?p=13099273&postcount=1921
Are you... anyway. Look at the post again; my scumreads are above the "/scumreads" line, they're VG and SK. And Nich told me not to include points against him since he felt we'd covered it and that he was clearly my #1 read (and he still is obviously).
I'd love to see you quote me on that, haha. But no, obviously that's not my position.
Again, I'd love to see a quote on that. In reality, posting scumreads and lynching them is important, while trumpeting and pushing townreads isn't; townreads can stay close to the vest, and some scumreads at times as well. But a player should always be supporting a lynch, with appropriate reasoning that they stand by until their lynch goes through.
Since 2a) is entirely wrong, it's pretty clear how this point would coexist. Anyway, cleared up since I've posted my reads and reasoning, yes?
Almost. There are town tells, but they're not as important. Scumreads are; gotta lynch scummy people. It seems to me that if a situation has potential town and scum motivations behind it, and no reason to think that one or the other is more likely, then it's null.By asking me about Zen and PTSD and why Swiss is scummier than them, you set up a specific frame of reference between those three. Between the three of them, yes, Swiss is scummiest because he's trying to accomplish something. Zen is least scummy. Compared to other players, Swiss obviously isn't scummier, which is explained in my recent list.
It's a strategy to appear overtly indecisive as a hydra; at the very least I did it in Pulp Fiction hydraing with X1. Hydras have private communication and they'll use it; public disagreement is always intentional because they choose to let us know, and thus is anti-town because it skunks up our reads of the slot, but specifically I'm reminded of PF where we did it as scum.
Yes, it's an ordered list of every player I'd lynch.[/collapse]
Specifically on SK you can call me a sucker or dumb or whatever you want just as others have but I am holding Link with his demonstrated power as town. His subsequent claim after my initial push on him lines up with the read I obtained during that push.
No, because as I've said I'll have my case on Nich toMorrow and people I thnk are dodging me will have to answer my questions instead.
Answered the question I was going to ask for the most part.
Yeah you do.
If I'mma do something, I'm gonna do it properly.
I deny this vehemently.
My cheeky attitude sees me to LyLo. Gawd, what am I like?
I suspect it's what I didn't do that was the issue.
Defend me child.
huh what why WHY MAN WHY
PLEASE DON'T BE TOWN.**** you guys are ********.
Anyone else notice DeGrey just pushing whatever the rest of town wants with out backing it up? First SK now swiss wtf
T block I don't really have much else to say to you other than I disagree with your ran scum case and if you truly feel that way i ask you to explore and elabortae on it further, or quote your iniial reasoning about his question play thing because I don't remember it.
Nabe I don't know what I ignored but it was probably something you said to j or somehig unimportan. I'll look when I get home.
You spent too long thinking this post through. Dislike.
How do you know I'm not indie? You know who the indie is. Why is it you?
