We're not mocking you for wanting him banned, we're mocking you for wanting him banned for either BS reasons or insufficient reasoning (as in, some of you have a few valid points, but they're not enough or it's too early to conclusively tell).
Yet despite insufficient evidence, some people are still shouting it from the rooftops that Meta-Knight needs to be banned
now. Not that there's mounting evidence or that he should be banned
eventually but that he should be banned
now.
It's
those people we (or at least I and anyone credible) mock.
Also, who the heck is A
suma and when did we
ever say that that he's beatable if you just work hard enough?
Oh wait... 08 user? Anti-MK? I must be a moron so this post will just be flamed or ignored. Mostly because I am an 08 user though. It is of course scientifically proven that join date reflects intelligence.
P.S. I am neither pro nor anti-MK. I am neutral.
You see a user make an outlandish claim without providing sufficient evidence to prove his potion. You look at his join date. It's sometime this year.
Do you:
A) Assume he's an idiot for making that claim
B) Assume he's right and agree with him
If someone says something either stupid or just isn't able to prove their standpoint and their join date is sometime this year, a lot of us just assume he's new to Smash and/or ignorant of Competitive Smash. Heck, I do it even if people's join dates are '04.
I assume
everyone's a moron until proven otherwise. Why
should I assume someone's outlandish and insufficiently proven point is right when I've got a mountain of counter-arguments to refute them into yesteryear?
