controlfreak7
Smash Ace
Low tiers don't suck they just aren't picked that much, thus rarely get a chance to prove themselves.
To NJ's post:
Has link vs. marth always been even? Or was it just after aniki did really well with link against ken's marth that people are concluding that.
This is what I understand from how well aniki did against ken. If aniki chose a top tier character he would be almost as good as ken.
This stuff is bull****, you pick the freaking character you want to pick you play with them, you don't make any johns, you understand that low tiers don't suck they are just "unstudied". Low tiers are seriously the garbage can of smash. Lets play every character for 5 seconds and see which ones we like the most and make those the most popular characters which then make them the best. Being a low tier character just means you have depend more on yourself than outside sources to help you learn good stuff with low tiers. Thats all it means and that is all it will ever mean.
I play fox and if I went to more tourneys I would be better than I am now (against people that I don't know that is.) and when people are like fox is broken/cheap, I'm like this is bull**** I pick him and don't do that well with him. I know that I don't suck and that I'm not horrible at this game. In the end all characters take the same amount of effort to use to the best of their ability.
some things about low tiers have to be self-discovered that is about the only difference concerning the tiers except:
low tiers= more mindgames less techs (not because they don't take as much tech skill, they just lack them)
top tiers= more tech skill less mindgames.
And its not like one outweighs the other by a lot it is just over marginal differences.
Screw this ****, no more of this stuff about tiers. If anymore problems about the tiers come up I say we burn the person who even had a single thought about something similar to tiers that lead to the birth of the tiers.
To NJ's post:
Has link vs. marth always been even? Or was it just after aniki did really well with link against ken's marth that people are concluding that.
This is what I understand from how well aniki did against ken. If aniki chose a top tier character he would be almost as good as ken.
This stuff is bull****, you pick the freaking character you want to pick you play with them, you don't make any johns, you understand that low tiers don't suck they are just "unstudied". Low tiers are seriously the garbage can of smash. Lets play every character for 5 seconds and see which ones we like the most and make those the most popular characters which then make them the best. Being a low tier character just means you have depend more on yourself than outside sources to help you learn good stuff with low tiers. Thats all it means and that is all it will ever mean.
I play fox and if I went to more tourneys I would be better than I am now (against people that I don't know that is.) and when people are like fox is broken/cheap, I'm like this is bull**** I pick him and don't do that well with him. I know that I don't suck and that I'm not horrible at this game. In the end all characters take the same amount of effort to use to the best of their ability.
some things about low tiers have to be self-discovered that is about the only difference concerning the tiers except:
low tiers= more mindgames less techs (not because they don't take as much tech skill, they just lack them)
top tiers= more tech skill less mindgames.
And its not like one outweighs the other by a lot it is just over marginal differences.
Screw this ****, no more of this stuff about tiers. If anymore problems about the tiers come up I say we burn the person who even had a single thought about something similar to tiers that lead to the birth of the tiers.