SCOTU
Smash Hero
When are people going to learn that you can never prove either side of this argument by saying "well, I've seen the CPU do X; I've done X a bunch", even if you're the ONLY PERSON IN THE WORLD THAT DOES X. Speculative observation does not count as proof. If it did, we'd already have proven that Extra-Terrestrials frequently visit our planet. There are only a few people in this thread who have even put a half second's worth of thought into even trying to deal with this debate in a reasonable manner. Step it up guys. I don't want to see another post about seeing their computer doing something and relating that to what they do. Evidence DOES include CPUs being able to do something or not, not situational evidence being compared against your play.
For instance, a VALID piece of evidence:
If CPUs can store input to "learn", and a DAC is a valid input that gets used, why can't they DAC?
an INVALID piece of evidence:
I DAC all the time, if a CPU learned, it would pick up DACing easily, but doesn't.
Please try to see the difference in these two claims. Note how the one is Valid and the other isn't and WHY. Please only use valid arguments. If you're just giving a bunch of things that don't actually contribute to the discussion, you're just spamming. Step it up.
For instance, a VALID piece of evidence:
If CPUs can store input to "learn", and a DAC is a valid input that gets used, why can't they DAC?
an INVALID piece of evidence:
I DAC all the time, if a CPU learned, it would pick up DACing easily, but doesn't.
Please try to see the difference in these two claims. Note how the one is Valid and the other isn't and WHY. Please only use valid arguments. If you're just giving a bunch of things that don't actually contribute to the discussion, you're just spamming. Step it up.