∫unk
Smash Master
10falcondefinitelyisnttheworstsCaptain Falcon is now 23rd in Tournament Results with a second place finish at a large tournament.
http://smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=165954
Probably not the worst character in the game.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
10falcondefinitelyisnttheworstsCaptain Falcon is now 23rd in Tournament Results with a second place finish at a large tournament.
http://smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=165954
Probably not the worst character in the game.
Tier lists just atract people to a select group of "good" characters. You know what? I hope he is bottom tier so that I can be one of the few people on Earth to main Falcon and be good with him.Falcon works well if Chuck Norris use it
Seriusly, tier list is a crap, good players focus in his favorite character to make it unstoppable, maybe someday will appear a legendary falcon player and pwn everyone in an important tourney while this song is playing in our heads
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=h_SxVtf6Nk0
Captain Falcon is the coolest character in the game he is in the top of cool tier list
Looks like part of the sig was cut-off.^^^^^smash brothers 2008, why isnt zero suit samus top tier???????
That just means they are easier to play as. Unless a character has an unbeatable move, skill will always be the primary factor in who is going to win, because any move has a counter. Certain characters have moves that can be beaten with fewer moves than others (such as Snake's tilts), and that is generally what makes people think of them as better, but every character has weaknesses that can be exploited.who ever is saying skill > char you are really off and have never been 2 a tourny. If a "skilled" player picks up snake or MK he will do naturally better then if he picked up cf... just pick snake and ftilt all day its fun.
sorry bro your wrong, when at a tourny top tiers will win, regardless of how much skill you have (unless you dodge every **** move), however seconding a low tier character builds your fundamental skills, so when you play a top tier character your next to unstoppable.That just means they are easier to play as. Unless a character has an unbeatable move, skill will always be the primary factor in who is going to win, because any move has a counter. Certain characters have moves that can be beaten with fewer moves than others (such as Snake's tilts), and that is generally what makes people think of them as better, but every character has weaknesses that can be exploited.
I thought that Samus and ZSS would be considered one since they are the same person. I guess I should change it though, thanks.^^^^^smash brothers 2008, why isnt zero suit samus top tier???????
Next to unstoppable != unstoppable. Mind games > all.sorry bro your wrong, when at a tourny top tiers will win, regardless of how much skill you have (unless you dodge every **** move), however seconding a low tier character builds your fundamental skills, so when you play a top tier character your next to unstoppable.
...That's a bad way to think of it, and completely untrue.sorry bro your wrong, when at a tourny top tiers will win, regardless of how much skill you have (unless you dodge every **** move), however seconding a low tier character builds your fundamental skills, so when you play a top tier character your next to unstoppable.
Yeah I'd expect someone who is good with multiple characters to be able to counterpick their 'top-tier' opponent and win by just picking easy matchups. But I still think that there is a level of skill at which tiers/matchups won't matter at all (although that level is probably unattainable by 99.9% of the Smash community, and probably hasn't been reached yet by anyone in the world). Let's give the game a few years and see how the 'tiers' stand....That's a bad way to think of it, and completely untrue.
Brawl has a very very large tourney-viable scene, as most characters are actually based upon matchups rather than beating every other character in the game (bar Snake/MK, from what I hear). The notion that only the top 3 will win is absurd.
And what happens when your opponent's mind games are just as good? Now they've got everything you have and then some. Anybody can have mind games. But only Snake will ever have Snake's f-tilt, only Metaknight will ever have Metaknight's tornado. You can't "learn" a character specific advantage. A player with great mind games and a great character will always beat a player with great mind games only. Unless you're maybe 10 x better than than your competition, you need the advantage that a higher tier character offers. Whoever has the most advantages will always win. (Obviously being more skilled than your opponent is the greatest advantage, but you won't always have that luxury).Next to unstoppable != unstoppable. Mind games > all.
Not really, it can also depend on how strong your opponent is. And no, I don't mean Brawl character-opponent. I mean the fat kid sitting next to you. If you can scratch his eyes out you're probably going to win. Though it's kinda useless to have prize money when your in jail...And what happens when your opponent's mind games are just as good? Now they've got everything you have and then some. Anybody can have mind games. But only Snake will ever have Snake's f-tilt, only Metaknight will ever have Metaknight's tornado. You can't "learn" a character specific advantage. A player with great mind games and a great character will always beat a player with great mind games only. Unless you're maybe 10 x better than than your competition, you need the advantage that a higher tier character offers. Whoever has the most advantages will always win. (Obviously being more skilled than your opponent is the greatest advantage, but you won't always have that luxury).
Ah but what happens when your opponent is supremely buff =)? Not all smashers are untrained in the art of self defense. Just another (dubious) advantage to add to the list.Not really, it can also depend on how strong your opponent is. And no, I don't mean Brawl character-opponent. I mean the fat kid sitting next to you. If you can scratch his eyes out you're probably going to win. Though it's kinda useless to have prize money when your in jail...
...That's a bad way to think of it, and completely untrue.
Brawl has a very very large tourney-viable scene, as most characters are actually based upon matchups rather than beating every other character in the game (bar Snake/MK, from what I hear). The notion that only the top 3 will win is absurd.
Not if Kirby copies it.only Metaknight will ever have Metaknight's tornado.
No, MK is button-mash freindly. When I first got Brawl I had him down in a few games. My MK can probably be better, though.i think the higher your tier is the less work you need to win.compare mk to captain falcon.i could probably get mk down in a month, but i had to practice for months for my captain falcon to be decent.
FAILUREUmm yeah... becuase the difference between Brawl's top and bottom characters is soooo vast, right?
Brawl is the most balance SSB i've seen yet. Do you really think that the developers actually spent four years just sitting at the computers doing nothing. Sakurai focused on this entire balance issue the whole time!
ROFLMAOFAILURE
10failures
The funny thing is, you just verbally assaulted someone for posting a relatively innocent comment. Sure, it was wrong, but does that give you the right to flame him?FAILURE
10failures
Smash Wiki can also be edited by ANYONE in the world, so you shouldn't rely on that for information too much, although what you're saying is probably true.Smash Wikia even says that tiers are just a measure of which characters are MORE LIKELY to win, given that both players have the same amount of skill.
So Skill > Tiers