PotatoPotatoPotatoPotato
Smash Rookie
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2008
- Messages
- 10
This is a rankings
Last edited:
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
1: 1561 possible teams I believe and to your last question yes I would rank them separately as teams so each would half points2 points that may prove this to be difficult:
1. Do you know how many possible teams there are? Bum and Snakeee did quite well just recently with a DK + Zamus team. How often do you think that team combo happens? Plus, what happens when someone changes characters after a match? Like M2K and Azen playing DSF and Edrees at HOBO11, where they played MK + Lucario/MK instead of just one or the other. Would you rank them separately? Give MK + Lucario then MK + MK half points?
2. If you decide to not rank this by pairs, and instead rank this by characters alone, then you're probably making the right decision. But there is also a problem with that. What if (and I'm making this up) Lucas is horrible in teams, but if paired with G&W he becomes an absolute beast?
While I applaud your dedication to try and do something like this, Ankoku's ranking system does not logistically work with doubles very well.
I think a different way of viewing the results may help with this endeavor.
Ankoku's list is useful because it presents the data in a visually easy way. In 1v1s, it's best to have it as a list. In this case, a list would be long and unwieldy. Therefore, I propose a different presentation. A chart.
It would be a complicated process. For one thing, you'd have to calculate the point totals for every team, then for each character individually. Then, you would have to order the chart according to each character's individual performance. This would be likely to put all of the best teams in the upper left hand corner, and less good ones in the bottom right. Any anomalies would hopefully stand out.
You could also rank each team into various rankings, and color code it, so that highly ranked teams using low-ranked characters would stand out even more.
Good luck with this, though. It looks like a hell of a lot of work, and if you can pull it off, then you're basically amazing.
That's why you rank each character individually by how well they do in teams, then cross-reference the list with itself so you can break down their performance.The Chart is a good idea, but arranging from best teams top left to worst bot right would cause you to end up with a TON of problems
for example, let's say Snake does awesome with Lucas, Lucas does terrible with Fox, Fox does great with Falco, and Falco does terrible with Snake, you end up not being able to place them by rank
This is exactly what my idea is. Stop stealing my good ideas, Adapt. <3Interesting project, but it will be a lot of work.
Idea for organization:
You could set it up like the character matchup chart only instead of a matchup it is a pair of characters. Cut it in half diagonally (you don't need to have 2 blocks for the same pair)
I know this does not actually "rank" the teams, but it would give valuable information as to what would be the best team-mate for a specific character.
Well if I don't steal the idea first, Faded will! <3This is exactly what my idea is. Stop stealing my good ideas, Adapt. <3
QFTfail for Luigi's Green name not mentioned.