• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Competitive Brawl Rule Set (NOT OFFICIAL)

Minwu

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
340
Location
Iroquois County, IL
No, Ganon's has to do with whichever character plummets first. He will lose if he Ganoncides Jigglypuff. If he kills D3, however, he wins. Bowsercide is the only move ever determined by controller port.
 

Delta_BP26

Smash Ace
Joined
Aug 23, 2008
Messages
606
Location
NYC
Corneria
Distant Planet
Jungle Japes
Luigi's Mansion
Norfair
Pirate Ship
Rainbow Cruise
Green Greens
Onett
Pokémon Stadium 2

Why are these banned? On the subject of Luigi's Mansion, you can't camp because of the pillars. The wall refreshing is for both characters and isn't random like items, so your opponent can refresh just like you and vice versa. Jab locking can be done, but you have two opportunities to tech there so that's just you being careless if anything. Also, if you're against a character who's jab lock is important (Link, for example) then break the mansion. It offers a lot of offensive and defensive capabilities. At the very very worst, it should be Counter/Ban.

As for the other stages, I don't get it.
 

¯\_S.(ツ).L.I.D._/¯

Smash Legend
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Messages
12,115
Location
Chicago, IL
I'm hosting a tourney tomorrow, this really helps, I love RC, Japes, and Mansion being banned! I hate those stages and they are super unfair. Norfair to. Nice job guys, I really like this, thanks.
 

Eternal Yoshi

I've covered ban wars, you know
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
5,450
Location
Playing different games
NNID
EternalYoshi
3DS FC
3394-4459-7089
LOL WOW. That's a HUGE banned list. I think Ganoncide should be based on percentages because Ganondorf can do it on any percentage and he deserves to win if he has a percentage advantage over his victim and if they are both on their last stocks.
 

Skyflyer

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
457
Yesssssssssssssssssssssss Norfair And Japes Are Banned


Just get rid of brinstar and it's perfect
 

Skyflyer

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
457
I'm hosting a tourney tomorrow, this really helps, I love RC, Japes, and Mansion being banned! I hate those stages and they are super unfair. Norfair to. Nice job guys, I really like this, thanks.
You and I think very alike my friend.
 

BIG C

Smash Master
Joined
Oct 24, 2004
Messages
3,917
Location
Distributing justice 24/7.
this list is good other than a few stages, I think RC and norfair should be on, not because of them being good stages, but being necessary for some characters like Diddy and IC's. also, I do not understand the suicide thing why is it a loss for the person who gets it, even though it's gay and it sucks there is no reason for them to lose. I think pictochat should probably be a CP.

The sudden death rule doesn't seem too fair for heavy characters, so it is kind of dumb that a game and watch would more than likely always win against a snake or DDD in sudden death, with this rule.
 

Skyflyer

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
457
LMAO, everyone is maaaaaaad.

10 bucks says 95% of the people that are mad rely on counterpicks to do well.

And the ones being questioned the most are the ones with the most hazards like norfair and japes. lol
 

MachinegunNorm

Smash Lord
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
1,319
LMAO, everyone is maaaaaaad.

10 bucks says 95% of the people that are mad rely on counterpicks to do well.

And the ones being questioned the most are the ones with the most hazards like norfair and japes. lol
10 bucks says you play IC or diddy.
 

Skyflyer

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
457
lol i figured it was that if it wasn't diddy or ic
Good people don't have to rely on hazards like the crocodile screwing up their opponent. The reason why stages like japes are banned is because they don't support 100% RAW SKILL. It takes at lot less effort to use simple common sense to try to screw your opponent with hazards by doing things like tossing someone into the lava wave on Norfair than to practice having perfect reflexes.
 

MachinegunNorm

Smash Lord
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
1,319
Good people don't have to rely on hazards like the crocodile screwing up their opponent. The reason why stages like japes are banned is because they don't support 100% RAW SKILL. It takes at lot less effort to use simple common sense to try to screw your opponent with hazards by doing things like tossing someone into the lava wave on Norfair than to practice having perfect reflexes.
lol raw skill? try telling me this when you aren't using metaknight.
 

Kitamerby

Smash Hero
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
5,729
Location
Las Vegas
This counterpick list is no fun, even if it makes sense.

Good people don't have to rely on hazards like the crocodile screwing up their opponent. The reason why stages like japes are banned is because they don't support 100% RAW SKILL. It takes at lot less effort to use simple common sense to try to screw your opponent with hazards by doing things like tossing someone into the lava wave on Norfair than to practice having perfect reflexes.
100% Raw skill? Explain to me the purpose of Brinstar and Castle Siege.

With Brinstar, I have to constantly worry about the acid that comes up, and then it becomes a scramble for the top platform.
Castle Siege, I can hide behind the platforms on the second area, get gimped by the ledges on the first, and get chaingrabbed to my death by Dedede on the second area. You can use the same argument for Delfino minus hiding behind platforms and add on wall infinites. Actually, you can wall infinite on Pokemon Stadium 1, as well, so why not ban that? Frigate Orpheon, I can just throw you off with a low-angle knockback move off the right side and watch you fall to your doom as the platform tilts upwards, keeping you from recovering. Halberd has hazards that can KO, so we can't have THAT. Support ghosts on Yoshi's Isle can save people from spikes. That's unfair, so we can't have that. Lylat tips and can gimp people under the stage, so we can't have that. That's unfair to people with poor, or linear recoveries.


That leaves us with:

Final Destination
Battlefield
Smashville

...BUT WAIT. Diddy completely dominates Final Destination and Smashville, as do Ice Climbers, and Falco on anyone who he can chainspike. Snake completely owns by platform camping on Battlefield, and can put a bomb anywhere on-stage by planting C-4 on the moving platform of Smashville. Also, Lucario is hurt by the lack of walls on the latter two stages, meaning he's at a slight disadvantage before the match even starts. And some characters are gimped by the freaking LEDGE of FD, so that's unfair, too!

So that leaves us with...

?

ALL stages are banned! :O


Raw skill involves playing a game that isn't Brawl.
AKA this.
 

shaSLAM

Smash Lord
Joined
Oct 22, 2008
Messages
1,264
Location
AL
*cough
that is why they are called "COUNTER PICKS" and not called "neutral stages"
in the event that you lose, you can pick a stage you THINK will benefit your charecter or give you an advantage. but nothing is TOO extreme with the biohazards on them. otherwise they would be "banned"

its tourney edicate to counterpick sort of.

no duh jungle japes doesnt have "RAW SKILLLL!" otherwise it would be called a "neutral stage"

i, for one, am for counter picks. i think they require thought out strategies and knoledge of the game itself.
 

Kitamerby

Smash Hero
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
5,729
Location
Las Vegas
*cough
that is why they are called "COUNTER PICKS" and not called "neutral stages"
in the event that you lose, you can pick a stage you THINK will benefit your charecter or give you an advantage. but nothing is TOO extreme with the biohazards on them. otherwise they would be "banned"

its tourney edicate to counterpick sort of.

no duh jungle japes doesnt have "RAW SKILLLL!" otherwise it would be called a "neutral stage"

i, for one, am for counter picks. i think they require thought out strategies and knoledge of the game itself.
Honestly, though, if I could, I'd say we just ban DK from Japes, DDD from Siege/Eldin, and Fox from Spear Pillar, but sadly, that won't happen. I just wish we could simply ban stalling, and immediately half of the banned stages would suddenly become cool. :\
 

choknater

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
27,296
Location
Modesto, CA
NNID
choknater
Hey Ankoku you looked better as purple.

The main thing that sells this ruleset for me is Lylat as a counter pick instead of neutral.

:pPPPP
 

CaliburChamp

Smash Master
Joined
Oct 13, 2003
Messages
4,453
Location
Fort Lauderdale, FL
3DS FC
1392-6575-2504
Yesssssssssssssssssssssss Norfair And Japes Are Banned


Just get rid of brinstar and it's perfect
lylat should be neutral

i don't mind norfair anymore, but i don't think it's a good stage still.
I find this funny. Most of the MK mains all like these rules and stages, because they all know MK does well on starter stages and it will increase their tournament winnings. I know this cause I play Metaknight, and most of his best stages are starter stages because he can edge guard and stage spike on these stages. Add Shadow Moses, and Pirate Ship and Metaknights won't be dominating the tournaments as much. I'm being totally unbiased here when I say this, unlike some people.
 

Mr.E

Smash Lord
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Messages
1,520
Location
Lima, Ohio
The best justification for PictoChat seems to be that the stage's quirks are all presented in other legal stages as well. PS1 and Delfino randomly transform, Halberd contains equally lethal hazards. (Both stages have one semi-powerful hazard while the rest are mostly benign.) These three are all proposed as counterpicks, so what makes PC worse? It could be the combination of the two, but that's hardly fair considering Delfino has arguably worse transformations (Defino gives you water and walkoffs galore. PS1 transformations last the longest and give you the biggest walls, though all three do put up temporary ones. Picto also has the shortest transformations.) and Halberd's crane arm is the single most deadly hazard between both stages.

With Ganon, we are not removing a material advantage by making a rule. All players have equal opportunities to select Ganon and perform his suicide with equal expected outcomes.
Can that not be said for Bowser as well? The outcome of his suicide is always constant, dependent on who "wins" the lower controller port. It's stupid that the game uses this as its sole determinant for choosing a winner but it's not a mystery. The reason we choose to ignore the rules of the game in this case is precisely because the game does it in a really dumb way nobody likes. Could the same not be said for Ganon? Many people have voiced displeasure at how the game decides Ganon never wins, how it unpredictably chooses sudden death versus loss, and anything else that might go along with it. What is wrong with also deciding, "This is kinda stupid, why don't we just say Ganon wins?" such that there's consistency among the rules for suicide kills?

We could just as well follow the game's default ruling, giving Bowser a 50/50 victory or loss, just like every other suicide killer, based on whether his player "won" the lower port. That's silly, of course, but it's basically the same option you're forcing on Ganondorf players by allowing the game to unpredictably decide whether they lose or not.
 

Amazing Ampharos

Balanced Brawl Designer
Writing Team
Joined
Jan 31, 2008
Messages
4,582
Location
Kansas City, MO
No, it's not the same. If I select player 1, you cannot select player 1. You must select players 2, 3 or 4 who lose to player 1. If I select Ganon, you can select Ganon. It's completely different. If everyone could use the same controller port, I'd be arguing against the Bowser rule too (you should have picked p1, etc.).

Also, Bowser's isn't win/lose, it's win/tie. The only cases the rule for Bowser comes into effect are when it goes to sudden death; Bowser being declared the loser is never contradicted. The proposition for Ganon is wanting to directly contradict the game saying he loses which is really radical and way more extreme than the Bowser rule. I'm not sure why we should be going back and "redoing" gmae design to be "better" in this case; Ganon just has a worse suicide than Bowser. It's how the game was made, and it seems silly to contradict it.
 

The Real Inferno

Smash Hero
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
5,506
Location
Wichita, KS
I assume the SBR will put out a new rule list as well either soon or in a month or two anyway. It's about due for an updating. I'm not sure what I'll be doing with my own tournaments in that time. The community down here would **** all over a stage list like this though as it leaves most of our players without any real counterpick options against certain people. The stage list is something I have to revise during this length of time my tournaments will be on hold for the holiday season, but going with a list of stages like this for me would hurt my players' satisfaction.
 

Wobby

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
138
Location
Cottage Grove, MN
Great Nerf Ganon more, my guess is the people who made this list of rules are all MK users. Taking away the suicide win, and also taking away Pirate Ship ruined Brawl.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
I don't like either wobbling or wobufett, so whichever you represent makes me angry.
 
Top Bottom