Teh Brettster
Smash Master
Freakin' jackpot.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I dont think meta knight should get banned. not after seeing this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJwXBcRnbNM&feature=g-vrec&context=G29b91d1RVAAAAAAAAAQ
I can agree with that.That picture makes me laugh pretty hard.
Even though I am anti MK ban, I'm pretty sure I could be talked into banning double MK in teams.
I'll do some singles with you. Nothing lulzy.....Holy F problemo....You should live farther away =\...I'll be there if it isn't gonna be just bad doubles all night.
Just show up to more tournaments.Honorable mention after 3rd in that tourney (beating like half the PR, lol) and everyone there telling me I should be top5 in PR.
Makes sense.
Especially when 4th place hasn't been seen even in a fest since
..........................................
edit: JK he showed up to Rev9.
F tier - MuggleThe fort worth wizard ranking system, using the Texas PR
E tier - Magi Practicer
D tier - Enchanter
C tier - Conjurer
B tier - Mage
A tier - Wizard
S tier - Sage
Wht counts as active is entering tournaments with a 5$ or more entry fee. Pretty much if the file is going to count towards the Texas PR then we count it, otherwise it's too difficult to get an idea of where people stand skill level wise.*sigh* is it just going to start rotating out as players become active/inactive?
Ranking systems are always hard to do since part of it has to do with how you "feel" and the other half is actually fact based.I was hoping that people would understand the idea of the PR being like a tier list.
As many have noticed recently the matchup chart 2.0 listed each character in order of their ratios. This list is much different from the tier list, the tier list is a way of examining how well characters will do in tournament based on their viability while the matchup chart in my opinon is a list of the best-worst characters in order.
The amount that a player is active can be hard to quanitify though when compared to another player. Lets say one player attends only 1 tourney for a period of 5 months but places 2nd in singles, would he be considered better than a player who attended 4 tournaments during that period and placed 4th at each one? It's hard to say and its not entirely my call which is why both denti and ALSM have helped me create this list.