(:xXx11!1!LegOLAAAzz!!11XxX
![Smile :) :)]()
here, to give content (finally).
I had to read the entire game for this, so be thankful.
[Collapse=Notes]Nich's 22 is odd, just because it comes out of nowhere. Nothing "reminded" him about that, so why even post it? Seems fake. -.25
Actually nvm see where he's coming from given the set up. Back to complete null with him.
Lolz at Rajam's 29.
Rajam's 30 is an useless question. -.25
I like nich's catch on onto Xonar. Kinda nitpicks, but I see what he's saying. +.5.
Agree with Ryker's 39 that seph's 23 was rhetical. -.25 for Seph. +.25 for Ryker.
TB is too anatogonistic in his opening post. Feels forced. -.25
Gheb's over focusing on voting mechanics. -.5
Orboknown's posting lacks scumhuntiong as of his 65. -.5
Nich trying to get people to scumhunt as of his 78. +.5.
Not much going on that I can really dig into as of page 3. Mostly just set up analysis.
Kinda like Nich for trying to direct people into commenting on other things in his 97. +.25
Agree with Raz's 106.
Don't like Inferno's 111. Criticizing people about lack of scumhunting without making an attempt to do so himself. feels disingenuous. -.5
@Gova's 113: Do you think that TB was scummy for preemptively calling Nick out for inactivity? Cus you don't really say.
Gheb's first posts from 121-123 don't really do anything for me.
Nich missing Gheb's point in his 126. He didn't say you were wrong, Nich, just that you were being nitpicky.
Gheb opinion on TB? You're calling Nich out for the same thing that TB did, so I want to know what you're thinking about him.
Nich again misses the point in his 133.
Nick's 145 is very . . . . meh. All I can tell from this post is that he could very well go either way on the "newb scum" or "newb town."
Think TB's vote on Raz is unwarranted. Don't know where he's coming from at all with that. -.5.
Both me and my other half believe that we see good intent in Gheb's attack of Nich. So we're fine with him.
Don't like Nich 157. Both a reachy defense and offense. -.5
Agree with Raz's 162 & 163. I find myself agreeing with him a lot. He can get a nice +1 for that.
Inferno your 170 is bleck. Not really scummy but just bad. You mention scum picks but only unvote. If you're fine with someone dying, then vote them.
Nich's 200 is VERY reachy with suggesting that Gheb is using a chainsaw defense on him. Just because in your eyes Gheb is not playing optically doesn't mean that his motive is something entirely different. -.5
Nich vs. Gheb going on longer than it needs to.
I can see things from Glyph's pov in his 205.
@Raz 210: Could you explain to those of us who don't know Nich's meta what it is?
Wow @ Rajam's 230. We're be fine with a policy lynch on him.
Raz vs. TB resolved nicely. My other half might disagree with me here, and if he does then we can talk about and possibly change it, but the fact that TB was actually worried about why Raz was doing what he was doing and then not just drag it on shows me that TB was being genuine there. +1.
Seph you should be backing those works up with a vote bro.
[/Collapse]
So yeah, those are my notes. Note that I don't actually tally points, I just kind of use them to give people a general feeling of how much I like/don't like a certain post.
So basically, to answer Raz's question, our top
two town picks right now would be Gheb, Raz, and Ryker, for the reasons you can see in our posts.
Our main scumpick would be Nich (as explained above). Nich started off alright to me, and I could even see town intent in how he was asking people about specific stuff, but then he got into the argument with Gheb and he just started making some hardcore reaches plus wierd defense that I just didn't like. He can lean scum.
My other half didn't like TB and explained to me some legit reasons why (thought he was putting himself into a position where he didn't really have to do anything), but upon observation of recent events (TB's pressure on Raz and how that worked out) I'm questioning that. We're gonna have to talk again about this.
Both of us agree that Rajam is, as of now, policy lynch material. Also I think it's safe to say that Nick needs to speak up as well. Can't really get an accurate read on him until he does.