Flipped Game Order -

[SuSa]

Depends entirely on the 2 players and how they strike.

It very well could. It might not, but it could.
Potential argument for why we have the CP system right there.

 

[Yikarur]

Many people think the current system IS broken though. =P

I'm one of those people. Both personally (subjective) and objectively (objective...duh).

keyword is "think", it's only broken with extreme stage liberalism.

Depends entirely on the 2 players and how they strike.

It very well could. It might not, but it could.
Potential argument for why we have the CP system right there.

a lot of stages will always be striken so in an entire striking system a lot of stages will never be played or very very very [...] rarely. It's more likely that we always see the same stages than 60% of the stages will be played ever.

 

[MaskedAvnger]

what if they CP a starter for their game that they get to choose the stage for? does that stage get removed automatically from the striking list since they have already won there? Or are they forced to strike it first to keep the stagelist at an odd number?

Example (in case my phrasing was weird):

Player 1 is using Donkey Kong.
Player 2 is using Falco.

Game 1 - Player 1 chooses Brinstar for his stage, he wins.
Game 2 - Player 2 goes to Smashville, he wins.

in game 3, technically they would have to strike the starter stagelist, but Player 2 already won on Smashville, and most tournaments use the "you cannot play on a stage you've already won on"

 

[SuSa]

It's a median of bias.

If your character sucks on a stage that you and your opponent agreed on.

Stop playing a bad character.

If you have an odd numbered stage list... and you take away 2... you're left with an odd numbered stage list.

 

[MaskedAvnger]

So the striking is out of the entire stagelist and not just the starters? My bad, I thought it was just the 5-7-9 strikes.

 

[SuSa]

That'd defeat the purpose.

 

[infiniteV115]

I love this idea. Great thread SuSa.

SuSa smells funny.