Our public library has been having monthly tournaments (yes, a library promoting video games, screwed up I know), but they've never had a Melee tournament despite having the game there for play. I've really been looking for a chance to prove myself and distance myself from this "dark cloud" that seems to hang over the casual players. I think this is my opportunity.
As soon as I get Brawl, I want to play one of you competitive players over Wifi and see how bad I truly am. I sure am posting a lot recently. I've finally decided to stop lurking I guess.
Edit: I completely agree with what Frost has to say (for the most part).
Another thing you assume is that unless you compete in a tournament environment, you'll never meet another high calibur player.
Exactly. That implies that all the people who sit on their couches playing Smash are not "high calibur".
Every person who plays Smash has some sort of strategy or technique (that may not be advanced) they use. Everybody learns from every battle they play, even if it's against somebody terrible. Nobody has to be competitive to be good.
I played both my friends (2 vs 1) today and won, but barely. They were using Samus and Link, and Samus was just shooting me with projectiles. Link kept racking up my damage and I would get blown away by Charge Shots. After that, I started to dodge these attacks. I've never been keen on avoiding long range shots, especially in a free for all. I think I definately learned something about timing with your shield, as well as just gaining general awareness to the battle around me.
What you don't realize, rather, what you REFUSE to realize, is that tournament play is NOT, and WILL NOT EVER make one person better than another. Tournament play is simply a way of proving the skill you already have. Can you pick up new methods and skills this way? Yes, its possible. But without playing with the person you are competing against for an extended amount of time, its not likely.
I do not agree that tournament play "won't ever" determine whos better. Although I do have one opinion on it. In a tournament, you usually play that single person once. Am I correct (I don't know)? Even without the items and hazardous stages, you can still have factors that limit your true abilities. I am horrendous on Battlefield. If I end up on the upper platforms, I have a difficult time trying to find a good angle to attack. It screws me over. My point is, yes you can fight somebody and win to prove you're better, but like Frost said, you probably won't pick up anything new when you're too busy concentrating on winning.
I'd just like to know from the competitive side of the street: do you guys say good game at the end of tournament matches? I find it hard to imagine.