Well actually Aaron, you're committing a strawman fallacy and being extremely illogical because I said so.
But yeah, no guilt tripping please
But yeah, no guilt tripping please
-
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
HellaSmashed VI - $920 pot bonus
- Thread starter Croi
- Start date
Drake12
Smash Ace
But what is, in fact guilt tripping? Is guilt tripping not dependent on the perspective of the individuals conversing? I deem that just because you say that I am guilt tripping does not mean that I am doing so. (5 more paragraphs reinforcing this)
Where, oh where, should I begin telling you about how tactless Aaron is? How about here: Aaron's op-ed pieces are intellectually and morally indefensible. Here's a quick review: It takes more than a mass of loud, juvenile finks to prevent the production of a new crop of tyrannical, dirty proponents of vigilantism. It takes a great many thoughtful and semi-thoughtful people who are willing to break the spell of great expectations that now binds gloomy backstabbers to Aaron. Did it ever occur to Aaron that maybe besides being thoroughly offensive and abusive, its excuses are seriously defamatory? Dream on. However deep one delves into the citations and footnotes of Aaron's reinterpretations of historic events, and however poised and "mainstream" its cohorts appear once challenged, there is no way to forget that it is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks.
When I observe Aaron's toadies' behavior, I can't help but recall the proverbial expression, "monkey see, monkey do". That's because, like it, they all want to grasp at straws, trying to find increasingly vapid ways to scorn and abjure reason. Also, while a monkey might think that one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by reference to the social condition and personal histories of the scientists involved, the fact remains that there is no doubt that it will batten on the credulity of the ignorant in the blink of an eye. Believe me, I would give everything I own to be wrong on that point, but the truth is that Aaron keeps telling us that it is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong. Are we also supposed to believe that anyone who resists it deserves to be crushed? I didn't think so. Lest I seem like a hypocrite, I should tell you that many people have witnessed Aaron perpetrate acts of the most mudslinging character. Aaron generally insists that its witnesses are mistaken and blames its morally crippled jokes on adversarial cheapskates. It's like it has no-fault insurance against personal responsibility. What's more, as our society continues to unravel, more and more people will be grasping for straws, grasping for something to hold onto, grasping for something that promises to give them the sense of security and certainty that they so desperately need. These are the classes of people Aaron preys upon. It is a statistical certainty that any claim to the contrary is patently false, just as it is a statistical certainty that it insists that its hatchet jobs prevent smallpox. How can it be so blind? Very easily. Basically, Aaron may unwittingly resort to ad hominem attacks on me and my family. I say "unwittingly" because it is apparently unaware that it operates under the influence of a particular ideology: a set of beliefs based on the root metaphor of the transmission of forces. Until you understand this root metaphor you won't be able to grasp why Aaron finds it easier to discuss other people's problems than its own. It's that simple. Are you still with me? If it is not yet clear that it's incredible to me that anybody could be so distasteful, then consider that what I just wrote is not based on merely a single experience or anecdote. Rather, it is based upon the wisdom of accumulated years, spanning two continents, and proven by the fact that it wants to persecute the innocent and let the guilty go unpunished. Faugh.
Splenetic collectivism is the shadow cast on society by Aaron's expostulations, and as long as this is so, the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance. It's unfortunate that Aaron has no real morals. It's impossible to debate important topics with organizations that are so ethically handicapped. Aaron's grand plan is to pursue a twofold credo of metagrobolism and heathenism. I'm sure Mao Tse Tung would approve. In any case, it is apparent where Aaron's loyalties lie. But what, you may ask, does any of that have to do with the theme of this letter, viz., that it has no conception of our moral and ethical standards? I don't pretend to know the answer, but I do know that its sadistic, ignominious pleas legitimate irresponsibility, laziness, and infidelity. Aaron then blames us for that. Now there's a prizewinning example of psychological projection if I've ever seen one. Here's a specific example of the way in which Aaron is a fearful organization hiding behind a facade of cool: It wants to brandish the word "noncontemporaneousness" (as it is commonly spelled) to hoodwink people into believing that it is known for its sound judgment, unerring foresight, and sagacious adaptation of means to ends.
Aaron has remarked that totalitarianism is a noble goal. This is a comment that should chill the spine of anyone with moral convictions. To make sure you understand, I'll spell it out for you. For starters, mankind needs to do more to respond to Aaron's values. Understand, I am not condemning mankind for not doing enough; I am merely stating that every time Aaron gets caught trying to teach the next generation how to hate -- and whom to hate -- it promises it'll never do so again. Subsequently, its hangers-on always jump in and explain that it really shouldn't be blamed even if it does, because, as they aver, society is screaming for its perorations. Aaron thinks we want it to destroy that which is the envy of -- and model for -- the entire civilized world. Excuse me, but maybe I have reason to believe that it is about to commit acts of immorality, dishonesty, and treason. I pray that I'm wrong, of course, because the outcome could be devastating. Nevertheless, the indications are there that the real question here is not, "Why can't we simply agree to disagree?". The real question is rather, "Why can't we all just get along?" That's the big question. If you knew the answer to that then you'd also know why Aaron's maudlin preoccupation with recidivism, usually sicklied over with such nonsense words as "piezocrystallization", would make sense if a person's honor were determined strictly by his or her ability to mete out harsh and arbitrary punishment against its adversaries until they're intimidated into a benumbed, neutralized, impotent, and non-functioning mass. As that's not the case, we can conclude only that one could truthfully say that I claim that Aaron's opinion is a lazy cop-out. But saying that would miss the real point, which is that we should agree on definitions before saying anything further about its stupid, hostile threats. For starters, let's say that "absolutism" is "that which makes Aaron yearn to hamstring our efforts to take stock of what we know, identify areas for further research, and provide a useful starting point for debate on its mephitic manuscripts."
The best thing about Aaron is the way that it encourages us to insist on a policy of zero tolerance toward antinomianism. No, wait; Aaron doesn't encourage that. On the contrary, it discourages us from admitting that its advocates argue that trees cause more pollution than automobiles do. These are the same maladroit fugitives who excoriate attempts to bring questions of diabolism into the (essentially apolitical) realm of pedagogy in language and writing. This is no coincidence; Aaron's favorite tactic is known as "deceiving with the truth". The idea behind this tactic is that it wins our trust by revealing the truth but leaving some of it out. This makes us less likely to operate on today's real -- not tomorrow's ideal -- political terrain. While everybody believes in something, Aaron's simple faith in jujuism will definitely produce a large number of entirely repugnant extravagancies, most dim-witted indecencies, and, above all, the most fatuitous blasphemies against everything that I hold most sacred and most dear. In general, I am morally and ethically opposed to Aaron's announcements. Sure, there are exceptions, but it attracts pompous survivalists to its little empire by telling them that it has achieved sainthood. I suppose the people to whom it tells such things just want to believe lies that make them feel intellectually and spiritually superior to others. Whether or not that's the case, Aaron says that everyone would be a lot safer if it were to monitor all of our personal communications and financial transactions -- even our library records. Why on Earth does Aaron need to monitor our library records? It is bootless to speculate on the matter, but it should be noted that Aaron's tracts reek of snobbism. I use the word "reek" because I have a tendency to report the more sensational things that Aaron is up to, the more shocking things, things like how it wants to reduce human beings to the status of domestic animals. And I realize the difficulty that the average person has in coming to grips with that, but you'd think that someone would have done something by now to thwart its plans to feature simplistic answers to complex problems. Unfortunately, most people are quite happy to "go along to get along" and are rather reluctant to summon up the courage to go placidly amid the noise and haste. It is imperative that we inform such people that if my memory serves me correctly, some people think I'm exaggerating when I say that what our nation needs is more respect for the law, not less. But I'm not exaggerating; if anything, I'm understating the situation. I wouldn't judge Aaron's shills too harshly. They're clearly just cannon fodder for Aaron's plot to abridge our basic civil liberties.
If a cogent, logical argument entered Aaron's brain, no doubt a concussion would result. If you're not part of the solution, then you're part of the problem. Aaron's exegeses are like hothouse plants. They shoot up, but they lack the strength to defy the years and withstand heavy storms. I am not concerned with rumors or hearsay about Aaron. I am interested only in ascertained facts attested by published documents, and in these primarily as an illustration that I truly don't believe that people are pawns to be used and manipulated. So when it says that that's what I believe, I see how little it understands my position. The foregoing greatly simplifies the real situation, but it does indicate in a rough, general way that I call upon Aaron to stop its oppression, lies, immorality, and debauchery. I call upon it to be an organization of manners, principles, honour, and purity. And finally, I call upon it to forgo its desire to force me to undergo "treatment" to cure my "problem". In such a brief letter as this, I certainly cannot refute all the jibes of the most uneducated loudmouths you'll ever see, but perhaps I can brush away some of their most deliberate and flagrant practices.
All the same, given the amount of misinformation that Aaron is circulating, I must point out that when I was a child, my clergyman told me, "Aaron's hallucinations about the benefits of fogyism are so deep and inveterate that they can be broken, if at all, only if we reveal the truth about its metanarratives." If you think about it you'll see his point. Although the moral absolutist position is well represented by social and political activists and doubtlessly influences legislators and policy makers, Aaron's vassals have learned their scripts well and the rhetoric comes gushing forth with little provocation.
Aaron's operatives always show a streak of cruelty that enables them to find pleasure in their destructiveness. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that Aaron is stepping over the line when it attempts to support international crime while purporting to oppose it -- way over the line. There are two sorts of people in this world: decent, honest folks like you and me and hopeless incubi like Aaron. Easy as it may seem to present a clear picture of what is happening, what has happened, and what is likely to happen in the future, it is far more difficult to wage war on charlatanism.
Doesn't Aaron realize that at no point in its response to my last volley of criticisms was it even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought? I once asked Aaron that question -- I am still waiting for an answer. In the meantime, let me point out that I strive to be consistent in my arguments. I can't say that I'm 100% true to this but Aaron's frequent vacillating leads me to believe that it favors manipulative psychological techniques over honest discussion. So let it call me childish. I call it feckless. Aaron really struck a nerve with me when it said that it's okay for it to indulge its every whim and lust without regard for anyone else or for society as a whole. That lie is a painful reminder that if Aaron got its way, it'd be able to deface a social fabric that was already deteriorating. Brrrr! It sends chills down my spine just thinking about that. If Aaron's plan to shame my name is to be discouraged then the wisest course of action is to give you some background information about Aaron. Before we start down that road I ought to remind you that the conflation of snappish slackers and peevish common criminals in its calumnies is either dramatic hyperbole or a fatal methodological flaw. That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that if I want to burst into tears, that should be my prerogative. I really don't need Aaron forcing me to. All right, enough of that. Now let's talk about something else. Let's talk about how someone has been giving Aaron's brain a very thorough washing, and now Aaron is trying to do the same to us.
Isn't it odd that unruly, unpleasant whiners, whose inconsiderate lifestyle will overthrow western civilization through the destruction of its four pillars -- family, nation, religion, and democracy -- in a lustrum or two, are immune from censure? Why is that? If I'm not horribly mistaken, there's a painfully simple answer. It regards the way that Aaron knows that performing an occasional act of charity will make some people forgive -- or at least overlook -- all of its sleazy excesses. My take on the matter is that it plans to create an intimidating, hostile, or demeaning environment. It has instructed its drones not to discuss this or even admit to its plan's existence. Obviously, Aaron knows it has something to hide. Is it any wonder that the "freedom" that Aaron is always so keen to talk about is a sheep's freedom to choose the patch of grass in which it will graze while growing wool and mutton for its owners? The take-away message of this letter is that a necessary first step towards recovery is to look at Aaron with new eyes, unclouded by a lifetime of false information and deception propagated by beer-guzzling casuists. Think about it. I don't want to have to write another letter a few years from now, in the wake of a society torn apart by Aaron's besotted hijinks, reminding you that you were warned.
When I observe Aaron's toadies' behavior, I can't help but recall the proverbial expression, "monkey see, monkey do". That's because, like it, they all want to grasp at straws, trying to find increasingly vapid ways to scorn and abjure reason. Also, while a monkey might think that one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by reference to the social condition and personal histories of the scientists involved, the fact remains that there is no doubt that it will batten on the credulity of the ignorant in the blink of an eye. Believe me, I would give everything I own to be wrong on that point, but the truth is that Aaron keeps telling us that it is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong. Are we also supposed to believe that anyone who resists it deserves to be crushed? I didn't think so. Lest I seem like a hypocrite, I should tell you that many people have witnessed Aaron perpetrate acts of the most mudslinging character. Aaron generally insists that its witnesses are mistaken and blames its morally crippled jokes on adversarial cheapskates. It's like it has no-fault insurance against personal responsibility. What's more, as our society continues to unravel, more and more people will be grasping for straws, grasping for something to hold onto, grasping for something that promises to give them the sense of security and certainty that they so desperately need. These are the classes of people Aaron preys upon. It is a statistical certainty that any claim to the contrary is patently false, just as it is a statistical certainty that it insists that its hatchet jobs prevent smallpox. How can it be so blind? Very easily. Basically, Aaron may unwittingly resort to ad hominem attacks on me and my family. I say "unwittingly" because it is apparently unaware that it operates under the influence of a particular ideology: a set of beliefs based on the root metaphor of the transmission of forces. Until you understand this root metaphor you won't be able to grasp why Aaron finds it easier to discuss other people's problems than its own. It's that simple. Are you still with me? If it is not yet clear that it's incredible to me that anybody could be so distasteful, then consider that what I just wrote is not based on merely a single experience or anecdote. Rather, it is based upon the wisdom of accumulated years, spanning two continents, and proven by the fact that it wants to persecute the innocent and let the guilty go unpunished. Faugh.
Splenetic collectivism is the shadow cast on society by Aaron's expostulations, and as long as this is so, the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance. It's unfortunate that Aaron has no real morals. It's impossible to debate important topics with organizations that are so ethically handicapped. Aaron's grand plan is to pursue a twofold credo of metagrobolism and heathenism. I'm sure Mao Tse Tung would approve. In any case, it is apparent where Aaron's loyalties lie. But what, you may ask, does any of that have to do with the theme of this letter, viz., that it has no conception of our moral and ethical standards? I don't pretend to know the answer, but I do know that its sadistic, ignominious pleas legitimate irresponsibility, laziness, and infidelity. Aaron then blames us for that. Now there's a prizewinning example of psychological projection if I've ever seen one. Here's a specific example of the way in which Aaron is a fearful organization hiding behind a facade of cool: It wants to brandish the word "noncontemporaneousness" (as it is commonly spelled) to hoodwink people into believing that it is known for its sound judgment, unerring foresight, and sagacious adaptation of means to ends.
Aaron has remarked that totalitarianism is a noble goal. This is a comment that should chill the spine of anyone with moral convictions. To make sure you understand, I'll spell it out for you. For starters, mankind needs to do more to respond to Aaron's values. Understand, I am not condemning mankind for not doing enough; I am merely stating that every time Aaron gets caught trying to teach the next generation how to hate -- and whom to hate -- it promises it'll never do so again. Subsequently, its hangers-on always jump in and explain that it really shouldn't be blamed even if it does, because, as they aver, society is screaming for its perorations. Aaron thinks we want it to destroy that which is the envy of -- and model for -- the entire civilized world. Excuse me, but maybe I have reason to believe that it is about to commit acts of immorality, dishonesty, and treason. I pray that I'm wrong, of course, because the outcome could be devastating. Nevertheless, the indications are there that the real question here is not, "Why can't we simply agree to disagree?". The real question is rather, "Why can't we all just get along?" That's the big question. If you knew the answer to that then you'd also know why Aaron's maudlin preoccupation with recidivism, usually sicklied over with such nonsense words as "piezocrystallization", would make sense if a person's honor were determined strictly by his or her ability to mete out harsh and arbitrary punishment against its adversaries until they're intimidated into a benumbed, neutralized, impotent, and non-functioning mass. As that's not the case, we can conclude only that one could truthfully say that I claim that Aaron's opinion is a lazy cop-out. But saying that would miss the real point, which is that we should agree on definitions before saying anything further about its stupid, hostile threats. For starters, let's say that "absolutism" is "that which makes Aaron yearn to hamstring our efforts to take stock of what we know, identify areas for further research, and provide a useful starting point for debate on its mephitic manuscripts."
The best thing about Aaron is the way that it encourages us to insist on a policy of zero tolerance toward antinomianism. No, wait; Aaron doesn't encourage that. On the contrary, it discourages us from admitting that its advocates argue that trees cause more pollution than automobiles do. These are the same maladroit fugitives who excoriate attempts to bring questions of diabolism into the (essentially apolitical) realm of pedagogy in language and writing. This is no coincidence; Aaron's favorite tactic is known as "deceiving with the truth". The idea behind this tactic is that it wins our trust by revealing the truth but leaving some of it out. This makes us less likely to operate on today's real -- not tomorrow's ideal -- political terrain. While everybody believes in something, Aaron's simple faith in jujuism will definitely produce a large number of entirely repugnant extravagancies, most dim-witted indecencies, and, above all, the most fatuitous blasphemies against everything that I hold most sacred and most dear. In general, I am morally and ethically opposed to Aaron's announcements. Sure, there are exceptions, but it attracts pompous survivalists to its little empire by telling them that it has achieved sainthood. I suppose the people to whom it tells such things just want to believe lies that make them feel intellectually and spiritually superior to others. Whether or not that's the case, Aaron says that everyone would be a lot safer if it were to monitor all of our personal communications and financial transactions -- even our library records. Why on Earth does Aaron need to monitor our library records? It is bootless to speculate on the matter, but it should be noted that Aaron's tracts reek of snobbism. I use the word "reek" because I have a tendency to report the more sensational things that Aaron is up to, the more shocking things, things like how it wants to reduce human beings to the status of domestic animals. And I realize the difficulty that the average person has in coming to grips with that, but you'd think that someone would have done something by now to thwart its plans to feature simplistic answers to complex problems. Unfortunately, most people are quite happy to "go along to get along" and are rather reluctant to summon up the courage to go placidly amid the noise and haste. It is imperative that we inform such people that if my memory serves me correctly, some people think I'm exaggerating when I say that what our nation needs is more respect for the law, not less. But I'm not exaggerating; if anything, I'm understating the situation. I wouldn't judge Aaron's shills too harshly. They're clearly just cannon fodder for Aaron's plot to abridge our basic civil liberties.
If a cogent, logical argument entered Aaron's brain, no doubt a concussion would result. If you're not part of the solution, then you're part of the problem. Aaron's exegeses are like hothouse plants. They shoot up, but they lack the strength to defy the years and withstand heavy storms. I am not concerned with rumors or hearsay about Aaron. I am interested only in ascertained facts attested by published documents, and in these primarily as an illustration that I truly don't believe that people are pawns to be used and manipulated. So when it says that that's what I believe, I see how little it understands my position. The foregoing greatly simplifies the real situation, but it does indicate in a rough, general way that I call upon Aaron to stop its oppression, lies, immorality, and debauchery. I call upon it to be an organization of manners, principles, honour, and purity. And finally, I call upon it to forgo its desire to force me to undergo "treatment" to cure my "problem". In such a brief letter as this, I certainly cannot refute all the jibes of the most uneducated loudmouths you'll ever see, but perhaps I can brush away some of their most deliberate and flagrant practices.
All the same, given the amount of misinformation that Aaron is circulating, I must point out that when I was a child, my clergyman told me, "Aaron's hallucinations about the benefits of fogyism are so deep and inveterate that they can be broken, if at all, only if we reveal the truth about its metanarratives." If you think about it you'll see his point. Although the moral absolutist position is well represented by social and political activists and doubtlessly influences legislators and policy makers, Aaron's vassals have learned their scripts well and the rhetoric comes gushing forth with little provocation.
Aaron's operatives always show a streak of cruelty that enables them to find pleasure in their destructiveness. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that Aaron is stepping over the line when it attempts to support international crime while purporting to oppose it -- way over the line. There are two sorts of people in this world: decent, honest folks like you and me and hopeless incubi like Aaron. Easy as it may seem to present a clear picture of what is happening, what has happened, and what is likely to happen in the future, it is far more difficult to wage war on charlatanism.
Doesn't Aaron realize that at no point in its response to my last volley of criticisms was it even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought? I once asked Aaron that question -- I am still waiting for an answer. In the meantime, let me point out that I strive to be consistent in my arguments. I can't say that I'm 100% true to this but Aaron's frequent vacillating leads me to believe that it favors manipulative psychological techniques over honest discussion. So let it call me childish. I call it feckless. Aaron really struck a nerve with me when it said that it's okay for it to indulge its every whim and lust without regard for anyone else or for society as a whole. That lie is a painful reminder that if Aaron got its way, it'd be able to deface a social fabric that was already deteriorating. Brrrr! It sends chills down my spine just thinking about that. If Aaron's plan to shame my name is to be discouraged then the wisest course of action is to give you some background information about Aaron. Before we start down that road I ought to remind you that the conflation of snappish slackers and peevish common criminals in its calumnies is either dramatic hyperbole or a fatal methodological flaw. That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that if I want to burst into tears, that should be my prerogative. I really don't need Aaron forcing me to. All right, enough of that. Now let's talk about something else. Let's talk about how someone has been giving Aaron's brain a very thorough washing, and now Aaron is trying to do the same to us.
Isn't it odd that unruly, unpleasant whiners, whose inconsiderate lifestyle will overthrow western civilization through the destruction of its four pillars -- family, nation, religion, and democracy -- in a lustrum or two, are immune from censure? Why is that? If I'm not horribly mistaken, there's a painfully simple answer. It regards the way that Aaron knows that performing an occasional act of charity will make some people forgive -- or at least overlook -- all of its sleazy excesses. My take on the matter is that it plans to create an intimidating, hostile, or demeaning environment. It has instructed its drones not to discuss this or even admit to its plan's existence. Obviously, Aaron knows it has something to hide. Is it any wonder that the "freedom" that Aaron is always so keen to talk about is a sheep's freedom to choose the patch of grass in which it will graze while growing wool and mutton for its owners? The take-away message of this letter is that a necessary first step towards recovery is to look at Aaron with new eyes, unclouded by a lifetime of false information and deception propagated by beer-guzzling casuists. Think about it. I don't want to have to write another letter a few years from now, in the wake of a society torn apart by Aaron's besotted hijinks, reminding you that you were warned.
Lol, none of that actually makes sense.
| Big D |
Smash Master
So i herd u liek complaint generators so we put a complaint generator in your complaint generator
Also I was reading the tier list thread, people arguing Samus +1s Rob so next time you can 2 stock my Samus.
Also I was reading the tier list thread, people arguing Samus +1s Rob so next time you can 2 stock my Samus.
Drake12
Smash Ace
So that eliminates one john since it isn't as good for rob as I thought...still, like...samus? Really Mr.D D:
Also, Kevin...wtf?! I honestly understand like a third of those words. "besotted, Splenetic collectivism is the shadow cast on society by Aaron's expostulations"...even if it makes no sense the words would have me studying and looking for meaning in that for a long long time.
Summary:You know bigger words then me, I lose the arguement, and I need to hug you for taking the time to do that and for going ham on my ***.
Also, Kevin...wtf?! I honestly understand like a third of those words. "besotted, Splenetic collectivism is the shadow cast on society by Aaron's expostulations"...even if it makes no sense the words would have me studying and looking for meaning in that for a long long time.
Summary:You know bigger words then me, I lose the arguement, and I need to hug you for taking the time to do that and for going ham on my ***.
| Big D |
Smash Master
I think you missed part of my post.
One method of training I did for Impulse was to be able to play every character, even the ones I don't like so I don't get caught by any gimmicks.
Sadly it was two characters I already play that knocked me out.
One method of training I did for Impulse was to be able to play every character, even the ones I don't like so I don't get caught by any gimmicks.
Sadly it was two characters I already play that knocked me out.
Drake12
Smash Ace
My bad. How the heck you find half of this stuff anyways?
Wait! I just got it. I had to actually try it to figure it out, lol!
Wait! I just got it. I had to actually try it to figure it out, lol!
| Big D |
Smash Master
You don't find it, someone does it then you discover it.
It's like a chain I suppose.
It's like a chain I suppose.
Drake12
Smash Ace
Why the frig hasn't anyone tried this on arcansi?!
| Big D |
Smash Master
I guess you could once he name searches.
Yeah, complaint generators are only entertaining the first time >_>
BC is really good at making any thread into a social, lol.
BC is really good at making any thread into a social, lol.
Drake12
Smash Ace
Looks that way, I honestly have no problem with it since I'd like this page to be active. It helps I'd say.
Neither of you guys are moving out of BC anytime soon are you?
Neither of you guys are moving out of BC anytime soon are you?
Attila the Hun
Smash Ace
As soon as I saw the "new eyes, unclouded..." bit of the last paragraph, I instantly though of Princess Mononoke... <3
Yeah BC can definitely make this thread alive. We should move our base of operations here until HellaSmashed is over
Y'know what might be a cool idea? Having a social thread for ALL Canadian players to talk and joke around in.
Jesse did you ever get around to beating FF9?
Y'know what might be a cool idea? Having a social thread for ALL Canadian players to talk and joke around in.
Jesse did you ever get around to beating FF9?
Alphicans
Smash Hero
Holy **** Aleate committed hard to that imitation.
Attila the Hun
Smash Ace
I did actually! Managed to beat Ozma, too. It took me like 3 tries. The first time, he was lie, I'm gonna make you THINK you've won, then Meteor you for the one shot kill. Second time he decided not to play games and ***** me in two turns. Third and final time he just didn't use it. xDYeah BC can definitely make this thread alive. We should move our base of operations here until HellaSmashed is over
Y'know what might be a cool idea? Having a social thread for ALL Canadian players to talk and joke around in.
Jesse did you ever get around to beating FF9?
Such a good game though, oh man, oh man.
Drake12
Smash Ace
I must say I agree. My personnal favourite. Although I'm not try hard like you.
I never faced Ozma
FF9 just had the wackiest villain I've ever seen and the random plot twist at the end really made no sense to me. Thing I like about the game though is that it kind of went back to its roots and it is probably the last one...
Playing Snake Eater atm - no kills, no alerts run. Pretty fun
FF9 just had the wackiest villain I've ever seen and the random plot twist at the end really made no sense to me. Thing I like about the game though is that it kind of went back to its roots and it is probably the last one...
Playing Snake Eater atm - no kills, no alerts run. Pretty fun
Drake12
Smash Ace
What I like the most about ff9 is probably how every character is unique. Similar to you saying it's the roots I suppose. But I did multiple playthroughs just to use different teams back when I was a kid. Plus, when I was a kid I saved my allowances for a few months to buy it.
Bump for Nova Scotia.
I went absolutely crazy when FF7 came out... seriously saw nothing like it and the game was always on my mind. Looking back, it was great but it's severely overhyped.
Nothing beats the FF8 card game though goodness it was extremely addicting...
I went absolutely crazy when FF7 came out... seriously saw nothing like it and the game was always on my mind. Looking back, it was great but it's severely overhyped.
Nothing beats the FF8 card game though goodness it was extremely addicting...
| Big D |
Smash Master
Drake12
Smash Ace
Lol, that was a funny clip Dawson. Its a good movie, a not so good game imo.
I wish I got more into that game Kev...and hate to say that you're wrong, but ff8 is a giant ball of garbage. I could never stand it in the least.
I wish I got more into that game Kev...and hate to say that you're wrong, but ff8 is a giant ball of garbage. I could never stand it in the least.
FF8 wasn't the greatest but nothing can beat that card game. Nothing.
Drake12
Smash Ace
Didnt even care to get far enough to bother trying it. Gameplay turned me off and the character animations had them 70% legs and 30% body
SuPeRbOoM
Smash Master
Hey so, since im not going to fc anymore, I might go to this.
Anyone good wanna team for brawl, and someone for melee?
Anyone good wanna team for brawl, and someone for melee?
Yeah haha. The game isn't that good although that mini game makes up for it.Didnt even care to get far enough to bother trying it. Gameplay turned me off and the character animations had them 70% legs and 30% body
Man I wish I could play you... my Peach has definitely gotten better since P7 :o
| Big D |
Smash Master
I heard you like
In BC we're full of them.
Drake12
Smash Ace
Get KillLock out here too! He could maybe win the whole damn thing. Also, come beat everyones *** in n64 smash!
Attila the Hun
Smash Ace
As Drake said, team with KillLock, and rematch Drake and I.
Super HYPE!
Alphicans
Smash Hero
You guys know killL0ck lives in alberta and boom lives in new brunswick right?
Attila the Hun
Smash Ace
Excuses.
I live in N.S. and I was in BC for Phoenix 7. :O
Funny though, we were wondering if there was a scene in N.B., so we know there's one player at least. xD
I live in N.S. and I was in BC for Phoenix 7. :O
Funny though, we were wondering if there was a scene in N.B., so we know there's one player at least. xD
billybeegood
Smash Apprentice
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Drake12
Smash Ace
News to me! But as Atilla said, irrelevant.
1. She wasn't even that hot.
2. Not worth the 100$
3. Being ghey pride week, theres reasons to question if she was even a 'she'
camden
Smash Apprentice
This tourney better be pro. I'm actually prepping for it.