I'm not flaming, alright? But seriously, my grammars and spellings are good, so I'm okay on it, and flaming is where people made an offense against other members or that attack them. Moderators should take care of members who is flaming and give them a warning or infraction. That's the case.
I never said you were flaming. But you're convinced everyone saying anything even so much as able to be construed as MEAN is "flaming" and reportable. Unless something is flaming, or racist, sexist, etc. it's not reportable. None of their posts are racist or sexist, so you must think they're flaming, and they're not. So you need to learn the definition so you don't get so offended.
Your grammar and spelling sucks. Stop denying it. Every time you do, you make more of a fool of yourself, I'm sorry to say, because you fail at grammar and spelling every time you do.
GRAMMAR LESSON: 'Grammar' is ONE thing. 'Grammar' is never plural.
Spelling could theoretically be plural (I think)...but it's awkward that way. So just put them both SINGULAR. No 's' at the end and 'is' instead of 'are'.
[/grammar lesson]
No one is flaming you. And it's a serious problem that you're brushing off everyone saying anything that might hurt your feelings (I know, god forbid, right?), because you refuse to take anything from those people.
Sometimes people are going to be jerks, but you still have to listen to what they say. And the people in the beginning of the topic started by NICELY telling you what you were doing wrong. A few people were laughing, but if you were a more integrated part of SmashBoards, you'd understand why. We tried explaining it to you and you just brushed us off and kept believing the Prima Guide. People got more forceful to see if that would help it to sink in, but it still didn't, so yes, some people got angry, me included. Your whole solution has been "I have good points" at the beginning, then when people started to try to make it clear to you that you were totally not getting it, you went Report-happy. In all honesty, I think if I were the mods I'd give you an infraction for spamming the Report button.
This thread are not done here, wait until SamuraiPanda give us the conclusion that if Meta Knight is banned.
ANOTHER GRAMMAR LESSON: The thread is singular. It should be "This thread is". SamuraiPanda is one person, it should be "gives". "That" is unnecessary before "if", it just makes you sound confused. Beyond that, your sentences still aren't making full sense, but you have the basic concept.
It's your choice if Meta Knight will be banned, but if you don't know how to beat Meta Knight, then have you done a 'Dodge' or 'Aerial Dodge' in the game?
Yes, EVERYONE has done a dodge of some kind. These are the kinds of people who delve into the game and find techniques that weren't even meant to be in the game, like cape-dashing for Mario in Brawl, wavedashing in Melee (Before anyone tells me otherwise, knowing it was in the game pre-release doesn't mean they put it into the game), etc. They know what a dodge is. If beating every character were as simple as dodging, NO ONE WOULD PLAY THIS GAME. I would not be typing this right now because SmashBoards would not exist, most likely.
Anyway guys, this thread is a discussion of why Meta Knight will not be banned. Stick to this topic and discuss it here about why Meta Knight will not be banned. If you can't say anything nice in this thread, don't post it here, alright? Deal?
...Which brings me to my next point. I've done all I can for you. Take my advice or leave it, either way I'm leaving this thread. If you're a troll, then I really don't want to feed you. If you're just uninformed, you refuse to accept any help or advice, so it's useless for me to try and knock some sense into you.
If you're not a troll, I think you've probably broken a world record as the first person to troll without meaning to.
