-
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Nana CPU theory. question
- Thread starter Dabuz
- Start date
DeLux
Player that used to be Lux
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2010
- Messages
- 9,302
I think the best way around the whole Learning AI debate is this:
From a fundamental standpoint, the game might decipher inputs as all of them going to Popo. And if Nana is able to, she follows Popo. I think in reality we would then have a situation where we see the Nana doing all kinds of grabs because of the amount of chaingrabbing we do on our Wiis. But for my part of playing, I haven't seen any evidence of her doing that on her own. So the computer AI might make a distinction between if Popo is available and how inputs affect Nana and if Popo is not availabe and how those input affect Nana. If Popo is unavailable, we aren't in control of that situation, meaning then that we can't realistically "teach" nana to do anything. And since the that situation is the only time the AI would realistically be in effect, it might all be a moot point.
But in all seriousness, if the AI were "learning", the real question we ought to be asking ourselves is how to best maximize potential advantages of this.
From a fundamental standpoint, the game might decipher inputs as all of them going to Popo. And if Nana is able to, she follows Popo. I think in reality we would then have a situation where we see the Nana doing all kinds of grabs because of the amount of chaingrabbing we do on our Wiis. But for my part of playing, I haven't seen any evidence of her doing that on her own. So the computer AI might make a distinction between if Popo is available and how inputs affect Nana and if Popo is not availabe and how those input affect Nana. If Popo is unavailable, we aren't in control of that situation, meaning then that we can't realistically "teach" nana to do anything. And since the that situation is the only time the AI would realistically be in effect, it might all be a moot point.
But in all seriousness, if the AI were "learning", the real question we ought to be asking ourselves is how to best maximize potential advantages of this.
DeLux
Player that used to be Lux
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2010
- Messages
- 9,302
Dabuz, you're dumb. I thought you quit, lol.
Anyway, unlike melee, nana does not possess her own character pac file. The theory might have some foundation if this were the case; however, Nana is considered an article. As something you might understand better, Pikmin are also encoded as an article.
//doublepostfino
Anyway, unlike melee, nana does not possess her own character pac file. The theory might have some foundation if this were the case; however, Nana is considered an article. As something you might understand better, Pikmin are also encoded as an article.
//doublepostfino
Dabuz
Fraud at Smash
@lux...i haven't played since i've posted this thread, also, i don't bother looking in the files and finding all the technical aspects of brawl, i just play the game, stuff like pikmin counting as an "article" is news to me.
Rubberbandman
Smash Champion
Break it down for me e_a, what is a nana?
Sieguest
Smash Master
Nana=The secondary climber.
C'mon now....
C'mon now....
EverAlert
Smash Master
I don't really understand it, I was just repeating something Dant said. :/