The debate I wish to begin is that of the legality of the term "neutral stages". Is any stage truly neutral or does it benefit the high-tier characters over others. on a flat stage such as Final Destination is it not true that a character such as Toon Link would have an advantage over Bowser, I believe so, what is stopping that Toon Link from crating a wall of projectiles against Boweser, leaving bowser no other option accept to approach through the wall of pointy pain? This seems to be the argument that hopefully will stop the "neutral craze that is plaging tournament play and even friendly play. As a member of GameBattles I would say at lest 75% of the top 200 players usually prefer neutral because they use Fox, Falco, Wolf, Snake, Rob, Pit, or Toon Link. So does that seem that they believe neutrals are fair? Or that their Snake will demolish you on those nice flat stages. I would love a rebutle statement from someone with the opposite view as myself so I can broaden my knowledge on the topic but as of now why can't we all play the stages made for the game! :D Also before this turns into a (what about stages such as RF) obviously RF doesn't belong in competitive play. And as for the stages with gimpable sides; can't we just play honorably? or go for a fair kill instead of a F-throw of the side of flat zone. Let's have fun people! :D