D
Deleted member
Guest
>.>
you froze the game, the opposing player loses the game.
i mean if u say so
you froze the game, the opposing player loses the game.
i mean if u say so
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
They can't control the spacing of their opponent.The rule states that you are responsible for knowing YOUR character. Not everyone's. This is Yoshi specific. The burden falls on the Yoshi to prevent this from happening.
I'll say this is the best betThey can't control the spacing of their opponent.
Reset the game to the same percents.
$1.00 sidebet me on thisit won't happen ever.
They aren't officially banned I believe and there was never a reason to do so when a Marth's grab release did slightly better damage then Dedede's CG over FD with a pummel after each throw.So can we unban grab releases on Ness/Lucas now? Most of them weren't even infinites anyway. That goes for the DDD cgs that rely on pummels. This looks like a reasonable way to stop those.
seeing as how he could never win since "ever" never ends,$1.00 sidebet me on this
deal!seeing as how he could never win since "ever" never ends,
I'll take a $20 bet with you that it doesn't happen in the next year with any one
<_<Make that tournament sets ONLY. Friendlies don't count
tourney sets/ mms was my plan d:Make that tournament sets ONLY. Friendlies don't count
I guess I didn't remember it correctly. It does also say a judge would have to be able to conclusively determine who is at fault.Any action which prevents the game from continuing (i.e. by causing the game to crash or causing all characters to freeze indefinitely) is banned. If the Tournament Organizer or a judge can conclusively determine the player responsible for the failure, that player loses the interrupted game. Players are expected to know their characters and prevent this from happening.
It's specific to Yoshi. I can mash as much as I want against ICs. I can mash as much as I want against D3. I can't mash as much as I want against Yoshi. Marth can mash as much as he wants against ICs. Marth can mash as much as he wants against D3. Marth can't mash as much as he wants against Yoshi. That goes for any character....
NO
If you initiate a glitch its your fault. Generally, the person initiating the glitch is the character, but in this case, it has nothing to do with yoshi. It just so happens that the opponent can only initiate the glitch on yoshi.
O sorry i forgot spacing well is banworthy
Yes it would be. It would suck, and drop Ike a lot, but it would be. It specific to my character in that event. The character it's specific to is as fault.If ike froze the game if an opponent powershielded his nair at the tip, would it be ikes fault?
It's Yoshi's spacing. Your character, your fault.>.>
Its not yoshis spacing, its your button mashing. The reason its kinda his spacing is because its impossible to mash fast enough if you arent at the tip, because you go into his mouth too fast.
I'm tempted to hit up Brawl tournaments just to troll using this technique.L M F A O
Greatest find in Brawl ever.
No. The problem here is that you have inconclusive evidence to prove that it's only Yoshi's spacing that makes the glitch happen. The only information we have one video is that the glitch happens through a combination of Yoshi using the standing grab while the opponent is at tip range and the opponent mashing out activating the glitch to make it freeze. From this amount of evidence alone, we can only reset the match to same stock, same percents because it takes actions from both players to make this happen.It's Yoshi's spacing. Your character, your fault.
The "it's both player's fault" argument doesn't work. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the Chain Jacket freeze occurs during a hit. Wouldn't that be both player's fault then? And yet it's Sheik who gets the DQ. You can't have it as "both players, redo". One of the two could be behind by several stalks, and then come back and win in the redo. Somebody has to get a DQ.
Don't group. I only post here when people can't bring up logical statements is backed up with enough evidence (and mainly, it's about Yoshi because he's my expertise). That's mainly a meme that started because Yoshi mains jumped in as if this was a social when the topic was about Yoshi. The smart ones only come to correct the stupid posts made.Doesn't matter if it's extremely, extremely unlikely to happen: it still needs to be addressed.
And I thought you Yoshi mains liked it when this topic discussed Yoshi. What happened to that eh?
actually, the other common factor is the other person mashing...It's specific to Yoshi. I can mash as much as I want against ICs. I can mash as much as I want against D3. I can't mash as much as I want against Yoshi. Marth can mash as much as he wants against ICs. Marth can mash as much as he wants against D3. Marth can't mash as much as he wants against Yoshi. That goes for any character.
The common factor is Yoshi. It is the only common factor. Therefor, the fault is Yoshi's. It's Yoshi main's responsibility to know about his character, including any game freezing glitches associated with his or her characters.
Yes it would be. It would suck, and drop Ike a lot, but it would be. It specific to my character in that event. The character it's specific to is as fault.
Ive told you about this a hundred times niddo...The "it's both player's fault" argument doesn't work. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the Chain Jacket freeze occurs during a hit. Wouldn't that be both player's fault then? And yet it's Sheik who gets the DQ. You can't have it as "both players, redo". One of the two could be behind by several stalks, and then come back and win in the redo. Somebody has to get a DQ.
Seeing as I've never asked about chain jacket before: no you haven't. Please stop acting like I'm asking the same questions constantly when I've never asked them before.Ive told you about this a hundred times niddo...
In the Ike example, the other person has to PS.Its character specific, yes, but its also player specific, as the other player is the one that has to break the grab.
I was refering to the 'You trying to talk about other characters thing' but if I was mistaken then my bad.Seeing as I've never asked about chain jacket before: no you haven't. Please stop acting like I'm asking the same questions constantly when I've never asked them before.
In the Ike example, the other person has to PS.
And the other person mashing isn't a common factor, to the same level at least. The "other person" can be anyone. The character must be Yoshi.
tl;dr you're all idiots because you hold an opinion. now i'm going to add in my opinion which will be the best thing ever and better than everyone elses because i'm me.Wow, some of you guys are ********. If you consider this to be at anyone's fault then you might as well add back in Ganon's suicides and ****. The match should just be reset back to same percents because it's a COMPLETELY unlikely chance that this would EVER happen in ANY match because any smart Yoshi main would not even use standing grab (there's very rare occasions of it being used). Mix this in with the probability that you'll be within tip range of his tongue AND that you'll do enough inputs to "break out" before he swallows you is like next to impossible.
If Prime actually tested the tip range to see if it freezes then it would make slightly more sense at who's fault it would be (which is still impossibly rare). If he also tested his other grabs to see if they froze, then there can be better accusations; however, as it stands, because Prime made the game freeze due to HIS inputs, then it would be at fault of who made the glitch happen. Point blank.
@ Tesh: Care to find that specific rule? I have never saw a rule that states "You are responsible for knowing your character."
no longer stupidThis can happen with a dash grab too. So it can happen during a cg.