Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Isn't it amazing( or weird) that he hasn't been banned yet?Do Not Feed The Troll!
Yuna, why.........for the love of god why do you keep up with this? He thinks or is asking if Peach is bad. These results shows that she is not bad. Nor is see goldy. She is a decent character. And that was my point in my book. She is good. Thats it and the point I was getting across.I see Dark.Pch is still exaggerating Peach's prowess, as usual.
Most of the high placings occured at biweeklies or triweeklies, minor tournaments with little money and prestige or tournament with a large turnout but a low level of skill ("Family Fun Center"... isn't that the tournament with items?). One single Peach has been able to place 1st.
I wonder why the Top Peaches in the U.S. can only manage the occasional Top 5 placings (because those aren't the only tournaments you guys have been to, I'm sure... Dark.Pch is just picking and choosing the highest placings).
WTH @ mentioning a 33th placement out of 192 as if that means anything. Peach is Low. Not Bottom, but probably Low. At best the lower end of Mid (and considering the gap between the tops of Mid and High and Top, Peach qualifies as "bad", relatively speaking). Get used to it and stop talking as if she isn't, Dark.Pch.
You have to be leaps and bounds better than the opposing Top- and High players to win as Peach.
Yes, you can do just as well as "these players" if you just put enough dedication into your playing... place at most 2nd at minor tournaments or low-level tournaments (except for Rowan who's managed to win local biweeklies)!
Let me repeat myself:Yuna, why.........for the love of god why do you keep up with this? He thinks or is asking if Peach is bad. These results shows that she is not bad. Nor is see goldy. She is a decent character. And that was my point in my book. She is good. Thats it and the point I was getting across.
Wait... "good"? Didn't you just say she's "decent"? Also, I claimed you claim she's the best or among the best in the game where in my post? I merely criticized you for glorifying Peach, as usual.But no, since your "Yuna" Anything that comes out of me its just "Peach is the best in the game" State where I said that. She is a good character. So quit it with this and go focus on yours already. The ones better than Peach and knock yourself out.
You say she is low tier and w/e. I say she is not. Nothing more to get at about this.What part of "lower mid at most" was too French for you to understand? What part of "the gaps are so big being Mid/decent is nowhere near good enough... the Tops and Highs are just too good" was too Qubecoise for you to understand? Also, how well the lower characters are doing means bupkis. Individual player strength and character popularity plays a huge part in it.
Peach is doing better than Zelda, Ness and Toon Link, all candidates for High and Upper Mid. This doesn't really mean much.
But since you're using that list as proof of Peach's prowess, I'll just use it against you.
Also, 19th out of 37? Wow, great! Especially in a game where the S, A and B rankers are getting several times as many high placings as those in C (of which Peach is a member).
Peach has 9 Top8 placings vs. 42, 45, 27, 28, 22, 11, 18, 15 and 26 from the S, A and C rankers. Peach has 1 win vs. 19, 23, 12, 8, 8, 7, 3, 4, 4, 8 and 3. The odds of the S, A and C Tiers winning tournaments (using this flawed system) are anywhere betwee 1049.030 and 244.721: Peach's odds are 72.548, a mere third of the lowest ranked character in C-rank.
Did you hear that? Peach's chances of winning a tournament is only one third of that of the eleventh "highest" ranked character, who's still leaps and bounds behind the highest ranked characters.
Oh yeah, she's got great odds! She's gonna win a lot of major tournaments or place high in lots of them soon! With enough creativity, Peaches will be taking over the tournament scene within the month!
Did you get my reason for saying Mike G? I'm just gonna ask that before I go more into it.Can Mike G.'s Peach beat M2K's Meta-Knight, though? Or come even close to doing so? Assuming one character is being played by one of the best players in the nation forces you to assume the same applies for the opposing character, as well.
Niko K, that's where I disagree. She's viable, if by viable you mean "Can place Top 12". But she cannot win. She cannot win major tournament on a high level unless the Peach player is vastly superior to their opponents. The stacks are that stacked against her.
I'll use my often-used term: "She's good, but there are so many others who are amazing". Peach can really compete against the other Mids. And some of the Highs. But that's it.
Funny, there's quite a few characters with a neutral matchup against Meta-Knight.so your saying she cant beat a mk? If your saying that then you might as well call the rest if the characters garbage as well because mk beats everyone. M2k or not. You cant say that Peach cant win because of that, because then you would have to say it about everyone.
It's not that it's not a 50/50 or advantageous matchup, it's how disadvantageous it is.My god I get so sick of people saying "oh this character cant win because of mk or snake or falco or wario or ddd".
Neutral =/= Good matchupPeach asctuall has good matchups against half of these characters.
No one said this.I'm not saying shes great, but to say she isn't competitive is wrong.
Not really.Did you get my reason for saying Mike G? I'm just gonna ask that before I go more into it.
Only it's not what I'm saying at all.And your often said term is my point here. Expect Its like this.
Only she can't. If a god wields Peach, then we must assume she's going up against gods wielding DeDeDe, Falco, Snake, Meta-Knight, Marth, etc., etc. on her way to victory."Peach is a good character. She can compete with other characters well, even high tiers. Winning though is a pain in the azz but not impossible. While she may not win tournaments unless in the hands of a god, she can compete in them and do well. Also this applies to the players skill"
In Brawl, being Mid means you won't be doing very well in tournaments unless you by chance have good matchups against the Tops and Highs (which Peach doesn't).I am not saying she is a god or a beast character, nor am I am saying she is useless and cant do anything. She is just about right. My vote would be for her to be mid. But we have not seen any Peach players with the mind that Mike G had in melee for brawl. No Peach in brawl has come close to that. I think one person will though and I wanna see how far he will take Peach (and no I don't mean me)
If only one of these pros were supergay. Female characters would get lots of props.Imagine a Peach player with the mind of M2k or Azen..
wth? lol..I like Peach a lot, she's probably one of my best chars lolll.
Imagine a Peach player with the mind of M2k or Azen...
If only one of these pros were supergay. Female characters would get lots of props.
/offtopic
=3 BTW, can someone please flatter me?I dunno about sticking around here,LucarioMarth is way sexier than Peach! :3
You don't get to kill people using Lucario's butt, do you? Do you?!I dunno about sticking around here, Lucario is way sexier than Peach! :3
That was pretty funny. ^_^I love how Dekuu didn't believe you liked peach. Epic.
I have the exact same feeling about peach that you do Azen, Marth and MK are just *****es to fight against. Hope you bring some new stuff to the peach boards, if you even continue posting in this fanboy filled place.
I dunno about sticking around here, Lucario is way sexier than Peach! :3
No. You instead can either kill them with your tail or with your invisible, bull**** hitboxes. (Usmash ahoy!) =3You don't get to kill people using Lucario's butt, do you? Do you?!
Peach is sexier.
Blind optimism.The mike G comment was just an example of someone with a mind of his can do even against odds that Peach has and how far he can take her.
As I've already told you, those of us who are experienced in Melee knew that Jiggz could win major tournaments. Why? Because the gaps between the tiers were much smaller back then (I just told you this again a post or two ago in this thread). Being Mid in Brawl means much less than being Mid in Melee. They're not the same game.Jiggs was mid tier in melee. And there were reasons for that. But someone with the mind of mango did his justice and won pound with jiggs.
High and Mid characters all with good pretty even matchups against the Tops and Highs (as opposed to Peach)With minds like that, Peach could place better than people think as it stands. Mike G did it with Peach, Mango did it with jiggs. Wes/Hugs with Samus.
In Brawl it does.So being a mid tier does not make it hopeless. But you will have work ahead of you.
This equals "good matchups", how? "good matchups" implies an advantage. I told you that "good matchups" is not the same as "doesn't get eaten for breakfast/pretty even" in my previous post. And where's Mr. Game & Watch? He eats her for breakfast. How is Peach vs. DeDeDe neutral?! Falco vs. Peach? Not in a million years. Snake and Wario are far from neutral as well.mk- loss
snake- nuetral maybe just under
ddd- nuetral
wario- nuetral
falco- loss
"Good" implies she's, you know, good. Which she isn't. She's, at best, mediocre, because that's what Mid Tier is in Brawl. And that's at best.I like how I come off as a dumb fan boy when I only state that Peach is good. Not godly and not horrible, in the middle. And people are thinking that I am saying she is a goddess and will/should be winning tournaments.
I could easily drag up quotes where you spout off as if she can and will win tournaments. Don't make me do it as it will make you look like a fool.You think I don't know she has limits? You think I dont know how hard it is? for crying out loud I go only Peach. I know and seen it all. And cause of that I am a blind fanboy.