• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Scar on the Melee vs Brawl debate: What does competitive really mean?

Status
Not open for further replies.

tedward2000

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 9, 2008
Messages
2,395
Location
NAU
Nice thread scar, grats to you.
For personal context, in the sense of competitiveness both melee and brawl has various aspects.
But Brawl can be agreed is less competitive then melee, which has been stated many times.
So then take this, and a new kid that just touched brawl for the first time.

Brawl doesn't have the advanced tech's like melee, but both run the same way. For example, "Kid" can learn to play both games respectively just by brawl. So later, if "Kid" wants to then become more completive, pro, and join tournaments he can. (Based on what I know, there are more melee tourny's then brawl ones running at the moment.) So "kid" will go to melee, and play/practice/learn the advanced things that were not in brawl, to compete in more tournaments.

So what Im saying is, competitively: brawl is a pre-melee and melee is the next ring.
 

Paskan

Smash Rookie
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
5
Do you see my avatar? It's CHUCK NORRIS. Yes, I am THAT bad-***.

Melee is probably more competitive than Brawl at the moment, give it some time and it might turn around, it's only been out what, 5 months?
 

SiegKnight

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
323
truxoff, I was being sarcastic, obviously.

And even if it does turn around, it'll always be a defensive game and no one into melee will conform to it. Besides, lack of histun, tripping and other inherently nuisance mechanics won't dissapear via more playing.

I suppose this falls under the category of feeding the troll, but I'd like to feed him some conclusive logic to see if he still spits back at it, at which point nothing he says will be worth noticing as even a nuisance.
 

TRUXOFF

Smash Cadet
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
46
Location
your face
truxoff, I was being sarcastic, obviously.

And even if it does turn around, it'll always be a defensive game and no one into melee will conform to it. Besides, lack of histun, tripping and other inherently nuisance mechanics won't dissapear via more playing.

I suppose this falls under the category of feeding the troll, but I'd like to feed him some conclusive logic to see if he still spits back at it, at which point nothing he says will be worth noticing as even a nuisance.
I was just asking a simple question as to how you became so cool. Brawl is awful and everyone knows it, I'm not saying it's good. What I am saying is that I think you are cool, and most everyone would agree with me. Not to mention that many people have told me that you are a god at smash brothers, and I am inclined to believe them after having read your posts.
 

SiegKnight

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
323
I was just asking a simple question as to how you became so cool. Brawl is awful and everyone knows it, I'm not saying it's good. What I am saying is that I think you are cool, and most everyone would agree with me. Not to mention that many people have told me that you are a god at smash brothers, and I am inclined to believe them after having read your posts.
Troll (Internet)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

"Do not feed the trolls" and its abbreviation DNFTT redirects here. For the Wikipedia essay, see Wikipedia:What is a troll?

An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial and usually irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, with the intention of baiting other users into an emotional response[1] or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.[2]
Contents
[hide]

* 1 Etymology
o 1.1 Early history
o 1.2 Trolling in the 1990s
* 2 Identity trolling
* 3 Usage
* 4 Concern troll
* 5 See also
* 6 References
* 7 External links
o 7.1 Troll FAQs

[edit] Etymology

The contemporary use of the term first appeared on Usenet groups in the late 1980s. It is thought to be a truncation of the phrase trolling for suckers, itself derived from the fishing technique known as trolling.[3] The word likely gained currency because of its apt second meaning, drawn from the trolls portrayed in Scandinavian folklore and children's tales; they are often ugly, obnoxious creatures bent on mischief and wickedness.

The word occurs also in John Awdeley’s Fraternity of Vagabonds (1561) to characterize the first four of twenty-five types of disobedient male servants or "knaves." The first entrant in Awdeley's list is particularly illustrative, although no provenance has ever been demonstrated to connect it with the modern usage:

Troll and Troll by is he that setteth naught by no man, nor no man by him. This is he that would bear rule in a place and hath no authority nor thanks, and at last is thrust out of the door like a knave.[4]

[edit] Early history

Prior to DejaNews's archiving of Usenet, accounts of trolling were sketchy, there being little evidence to sort through. After that time, however, the huge archives were available for researchers. Perhaps the earliest (although poorly-documented) case is the 1982-83 saga of Alex and Joan from the CompuServe forums. Lindsy Van Gelder, a reporter for Ms. magazine, documented the incident in 1985 in an article for her publication. Alex (in real life, a shy 50-year-old male psychiatrist from New York) pretended to be a highly bombastic, anti-religious, post-car-accident, wheelchair-bound, mute woman named Joan, "in order to better relate to his female patients." This went on for two years, and Joan had become a hugely detailed character, with an array of emotional relationships. These only began to fall apart after Joan coaxed an online friend of hers into an affair with Alex.

Even those who barely knew Joan felt implicated — and somehow betrayed — by Alex's deception. Many of us on-line like to believe that we're a utopian community of the future, and Alex's experiment proved to us all that technology is no shield against deceit. We lost our innocence, if not our faith.[5]

Note: this incident can be considered a case of "trolling" only when the word is applied in its broadest sense to any unsavory action involving the Internet.

[edit] Trolling in the 1990s

The most likely derivation of the word troll can be found in the phrase "trolling for newbies," popularized in the early 1990s in the Usenet group, alt.folklore.urban (AFU).[6][7] Commonly, what is meant is a relatively gentle inside joke by veteran users, presenting questions or topics that had been so overdone that only a new user would respond to them earnestly. For example, a veteran of the group might make a post on the common misconception that glass flows over time. Long-time readers would both recognize the poster's name and know that the topic had been done to death already, but new subscribers to the group would not realise, and would thus respond. These types of trolls served as a Shibboleth to identify group insiders. This definition of trolling, considerably narrower than the modern understanding of the term, was considered a positive contribution.[8][6] One of the most notorious AFU trollers, Snopes,[6] went on to create his eponymous urban folklore website.

By the late 1990s, alt.folklore.urban had such heavy traffic and participation that trolling of this sort was frowned upon. Others expanded the term to include the practice of playing a seriously misinformed or deluded user, even in newsgroups where one was not a regular; these were often attempts at humor rather than provocation. In such contexts, the noun troll usually referred to an act of trolling, rather than to the author.

Recently, the word troll is also frequently used as a synonym for flamebait, even though the two words have distinct meanings.[citation needed]

[edit] Identity trolling

In academic literature, the practice was first documented by Judith Donath (1999), who used several anecdotal examples from various Usenet newsgroups in her discussion. Donath's paper outlines the ambiguity of identity in a disembodied "virtual community":[9]

In the physical world there is an inherent unity to the self, for the body provides a compelling and convenient definition of identity. The norm is: one body, one identity. ... The virtual world is different. It is composed of information rather than matter.

Donath provides a concise overview of identity deception games which trade on the confusion between physical and epistemic community:

Trolling is a game about identity deception, albeit one that is played without the consent of most of the players. The troll attempts to pass as a legitimate participant, sharing the group's common interests and concerns; the newsgroups members, if they are cognizant of trolls and other identity deceptions, attempt to both distinguish real from trolling postings, and upon judging a poster a troll, make the offending poster leave the group. Their success at the former depends on how well they — and the troll — understand identity cues; their success at the latter depends on whether the troll's enjoyment is sufficiently diminished or outweighed by the costs imposed by the group.

Trolls can be costly in several ways. A troll can disrupt the discussion on a newsgroup, disseminate bad advice, and damage the feeling of trust in the newsgroup community. Furthermore, in a group that has become sensitized to trolling — where the rate of deception is high — many honestly naïve questions may be quickly rejected as trollings. This can be quite off-putting to the new user who upon venturing a first posting is immediately bombarded with angry accusations. Even if the accusation is unfounded, being branded a troll is quite damaging to one's online reputation." (Donath, 1999, p. 45)[1]

[edit] Usage

The term troll is highly subjective. Some readers may characterize a post as trolling, while others may regard the same post as a legitimate contribution to the discussion, even if controversial. The term is often erroneously used to discredit an opposing position, or its proponent, by argument fallacy ad hominem.

Often, calling someone a troll makes assumptions about a writer's motives. Regardless of the circumstances, controversial posts may attract a particularly strong response from those unfamiliar with the robust dialogue found in some online, rather than physical, communities. Experienced participants in online forums know that the most effective way to discourage a troll is usually to ignore him or her, because responding encourages a true troll to continue disruptive posts — hence the often-seen warning: "Please do not feed the trolls".[10]

Frequently, someone who has been labelled a troll by a group may seek to redeem their reputation by discrediting their opponents, for example by claiming that other members of the group are closed-minded, conspirators, or trolls themselves.

[edit] Concern troll

A concern troll is a pseudonym created by a user whose point of view is opposed to the one that the user's sockpuppet claims to hold. The concern troll posts in web forums devoted to its declared point of view and attempts to sway the group's actions or opinions while claiming to share their goals, but with professed "concerns". The goal is to sow fear, uncertainty and doubt within the group.[11]

For example, in 2006 a top staffer for then-Congressman Charlie Bass (R-NH) was caught posing as a "concerned" supporter of Bass's opponent, Democrat, Paul Hodes on several liberal New Hampshire blogs, using the pseudonyms "IndieNH" or "IndyNH." "IndyNH" expressed concern that Democrats might just be wasting their time or money on Hodes, because Bass was unbeatable.[12]

[edit] See also

* Astroturfing
* Baiting (Internet)
* Breaching experiment
* Forumwarz
* Gadfly (social)
* Griefer
* Hit-and-run posting
* Ostracism
* Schadenfreude
* Sockpuppet (Internet)
* Virtual community

[edit] References

1. ^ trolling definition from PC Magazine Retrieved on 28 May 2007.
2. ^ "What is a troll?" - Indiana University Knowledge Base
3. ^ Usenet Newsgroup misc.invest.options 1997
4. ^ Kinney, Arthur F., ed. Rogues, Vagabonds, and Sturdy Beggars. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1990. p. 98
5. ^ Van Gelder, Lindsy (1996), "The Strange Case of the Electronic Lover," in Charles Dunlop and Rob Kling, ed, Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices, 2nd ed, San Diego: Academic Press, 1996. p.534 (originally published in Ms. Magazine, October 1985)
6. ^ a b c See Michele Tepper, "Usenet Communities and the Cultural Politics of Information" in David Porter, ed., Internet Culture (1997) at 48 ("[T]he two most notorious trollers in AFU, Ted Frank and snopes, are also two of the most consistent posters of serious research.").
7. ^ One early reference to troll found in the Google Usenet archive was by user "Mark Miller," directed toward the user "Tad," on February 8, 1990, saying "Just go die in your sleep you mindless flatulent troll." However, it is unclear if this instance represents a usage of "troll" as it is known today, or if it was simply a chance choice of epithet.
8. ^ Cecil Adams (2000-05-14). The Straight Dope. Retrieved on 2007-08-26. “To be fair, not all trolls are slimeballs. On some message boards, veteran posters with a mischievous bent occasionally go "newbie trolling.”
9. ^ Identity and Deception in the Virtual Community
10. ^ Example of a warning to blog participants about trolls: "do not feed the trolls." golo historians_13th's blog. Retrieved on: April 10, 2008.
11. ^ Cox, Ana Marie. "Making Mischief on the Web", Time, 2006-12-16. Retrieved on 2007-03-30.
12. ^ Saunders, Anne. "Bass aide resigns after posing as opponent's supporter online", Boston Globe, Associated Press, 2006-09-26. Retrieved on 2007-03-30.

[edit] External links
Look up troll in
Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to:
Trolls (Internet)

* Unconvential approach of feeding trolls, not killing them by Henk van Ess
* Article on trolls and the 'art' of trolling by Steve Myers
* Adequacy.org: Archive of Adequacy.org, a troll site.
* What is a troll? from the Straight Dope
* Trolling lore and essays
* Searching for Safety Online: Managing "Trolling" in a Feminist Forum
* Best guide to the various types of trolls
* Ubuntu Forums guide to types of trolls
* Interview with a self-proclaimed Troll by Lord M'Deentor

[edit] Troll FAQs

* urban75 Trolling FAQ: Comprehensive guide to the dark art of trolling
* alt.troll FAQ (how-to)
* alt.syntax.tactical FAQ
* False repentance at MeatballWiki
* The relationship between social context cues and uninhibited verbal behavior in computer-mediated communication
* Moral panic and alternative identity construction in Usenet
* Giveen's Guide To Internet Trolls

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%28Internet%29"
Categories: Internet culture | Internet terminology | Internet forum terminology | Internet trolling | Popular psychology | Internet slang
Hidden categories: All articles with unsourced statements | Articles with unsourced statements since March 2008
Views

* Article
* Discussion
* Edit this page
* History

Personal tools

* Log in / create account

Navigation

* Main Page
* Contents
* Featured content
* Current events
* Random article

Interaction

* About Wikipedia
* Community portal
* Recent changes
* Contact Wikipedia
* Donate to Wikipedia
* Help

Search

Toolbox

* What links here
* Related changes
* Upload file
* Special pages
* Printable version
* Permanent link
* Cite this page

Languages

* Brezhoneg
* Български
* Dansk
* Deutsch
* Español
* فارسی
* Français
* Galego
* 한국어
* Hrvatski
* Bahasa Indonesia
* Italiano
* עברית
* Nederlands
* 日本語
* ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬
* Polski
* Português
* Română
* Русский
* Українська
* Slovenščina
* Српски / Srpski
* Srpskohrvatski / Српскохрватски
* Suomi
* Svenska
* ไทย
* ייִדיש
* 中文

Powered by MediaWiki
Wikimedia Foundation

* This page was last modified on 2 May 2008, at 07:10.
* All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details.)
Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a U.S. registered 501(c)(3) tax-deductible nonprofit charity.
* Privacy policy
* About Wikipedia
* Disclaimers
 

TRUXOFF

Smash Cadet
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
46
Location
your face
You prove yourself worthy of the title "Coolest person on the Boards" yet again. How can you stay so consistent?
 

chansen

Smash Lord
Joined
Nov 28, 2005
Messages
1,750
Location
Madison, WI
^lame^

i didnt sign in to read about how much you like wikipedia.

brawl is practice for melee. my falcon and weej have never been better than they are now and i play way more brawl. tapion was a good idol i suppose.
 

bovineblitzkrieg

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Messages
360
Location
Boston, MA
OH MAN the double raptor boost to double knee is SICK




those foxes and that marth have no idea how to deal with a 2v1

i know they could barely move, but still...
 

Clai

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 9, 2007
Messages
1,254
Location
Where men are born and champions are raised
I am ashamed of being a Brawl player now.

That video needed more Falcon punches. If that happened, I would have probably went to a bar , go into a dancing rampage and slept with every woman there. Then I would have watched that video again and watch as the manliness crush all the STDs.

Ugh. I NEED A MELEE COMMUNITY!
 

Sumtime

Smash Cadet
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
30
You guys are right, theres no arguing, melee is all around more competitive.

Brawl's combos rely on your enemy making mistakes. But I'll still play Brawl and enjoy it.
 

curiousthoughtsbear

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Jul 29, 2007
Messages
159
How bout this, why don't we as the smashboards conglomerate of competitive smashers petition against brawl and overflow Nintendo co. with mail of all sorts protesting the game and its content.

Then we may have a chance at rectifying the situation, i.e. Nintendo fabricates a new game along the lines of MELEE ONLINE w/ extra sweet and flawless multiplayer mode.



This may just be a joke but, LOL, it could actually work.
>>>>>>>>>Reference to Shawshank Redemption anyone <<<<<<<<<<
 

Corigames

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 20, 2006
Messages
5,817
Location
Tempe, AZ
Man... guys... I just woke up after I went to a bar, went into a dancing rampage and slept with every woman there. Then I watched that video again and watch as the manliness crush all the STDs.
 

thesage

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
6,774
Location
Arlington, Va
3DS FC
4957-3743-1481
I actually had hope for brawl. Until I realized how gay the cg is against Ness and Lucas and makes them unplayable.
 

BIG C

Smash Master
Joined
Oct 24, 2004
Messages
3,917
Location
Distributing justice 24/7.
@Sieg: Yeah, I noticed several posts back that your tone in argument had shifted from combative to conversational, so I also shifted mine. I do make every attempt to legitimately discuss the pros and cons of the game and how the actual systems work at this point in time and how they will work in the future.

The way Scar has put it as far as the two qualities a player needs to be able to contribute this way to these discussions is unfortunately very true, and even more unfortunate is the lack of players who fulfill those requirements to the extent that I do.

I completely understand where you are coming from as far as keeping it a friendly non-competitive game. The issue in that is that I have no interest in non-competitive games for the most part as I consider my time somewhat valuable. Sure, if I am hanging out with friends and they happen to be playing, I will join in. I just have no expectation to really be interested in investing money when the odds of seeing a return on that is largely randomized and diluted because of mechanisms in the game, purposefully inserted to spread the odds of winning out so that low level players would have more "fun".

Bottom Line: Sakurai ****ed up. The smash community (64 and melee, you brawl-babies are too new to understand) has worked its *** off to be recognized as a fighting game when every other fighter community has defined us otherwise for a most of our timeline. We finally achieved that status and at least some recognition, only for it to be destroyed because the designer wants low level players to be able to compete with better people without having to work for that ability.

I find this incredibly disrespectful to anyone who has played any of the games on a serious level, blatantly ignoring that we have worked for something so that he can please people who will only play it on a non-competitive level, all so that they won't be butt-hurt over getting 3 stocked online because they can't keep up.

As you all know, this is going to happen anyway. All it has done is create an unnecessary tension in legitimate good players because we hate seeing ourselves get punished for doing something that should not be punishable. Not to mention the ******** movesets of some of the characters only further promoting a playstyle that is boring while playing and borderline painful to watch from a spectators POV.

What future does a game like this have? Considering the mentality of most people in the world (everyone is livestock; sheep desperately seeking out something to cling to and follow blindly), I would not be surprised if Brawl had some early success for tournaments, but I cannot imagine a group of people following this game and being as devoted as the real smash community has been to the games that paved the way for smash to be considered a fighting game. Brawl is a game that does not deserve the intelligence and talent of the high caliber individuals/players that have populated Smash's following throughout the life of 64 and melee.
*stands up, claps wildly for about 5 mins, sits back down.*

WAY TO GO CACTUAR TOOO FUXIN GOOD!!!!!
 

Clai

Smash Lord
Joined
Dec 9, 2007
Messages
1,254
Location
Where men are born and champions are raised
Man... guys... I just woke up after I went to a bar, went into a dancing rampage and slept with every woman there. Then I watched that video again and watch as the manliness crush all the STDs.
So it was you that was at the Ponchy Cinco's last night? Umm, just to say, it wasn't just women you were sleeping with last night. That video may have wiped out the inadvertant gayness, but my friend needs to have a word with you.

I got owned by Darknight.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom