Lain (ICs) beat M2K and Dojo, and Candy (Snake) eliminated Dojo.
Yeah and then m2k came back, beat lain (rather handedly).
how about the other times that we have seen m2k beat other players of similar skill?
Could that not be used as evidence for MK being OMFG SO GOOD?
Eww made a bad sentence. Had to edit
You are trying to use a player as evidence for a characters capability without acknowledging that the player is perfectly capable of making errors, being drunk, sleepy, high, happy, sad, aggravated and every other million things that can affect his performance.
The pro ban and anti-ban argument CANNOT prove itself through the behavior of one player no matter how high they may be, because we have seen really friggin good players make low tier characters look amazing. Does this prove said character is better than initially thought
POSSIBLY but it does not directly prove anything.
When you take everything else into account, character potential, then the argument would be proven but really, people need to stop bringing up m2k's game play at apex as if it is sufficient evidence alone.