Link to original post: [drupal=5131]Stop Shooting Ourselves in the Nuts, or, A Reasoned Discussion of Male Responses to Female Sexuality[/drupal]
I wrote this last October, so it's a little out of date.
The discussion at work centered around a particular anecdote from the book, where Harvey councils women who give it up on the first date, essentially telling them that no man will take them seriously if they have sex with them right off the bat. It sparked an interesting and humorous debate, but I was actually shocked at how readily so many people in our debate took Harvey's statement as axiomatic: a woman who has sex on the first date is not worth your respect. When we asked why this was true, none of the people who agreed with the claim had any substantive reason for feeling that way. They just did, because it was something that they'd been taught, and it had been confirmed over and over again throughout their lives.
I feel that this is problematic for several reasons, not the least of which is that we define the woman's worth by her (un)willingness to engage in consensual sexual activity on the first date, but we don't do the same for men. After all, don't both parties want it? Yet only one party suffers any stigma from the act, and it's always the woman who does. The above section in quotes is a tongue-in-cheek way to draw attention to this discrepancy, but after the conversation I had today, I felt a more direct approach is necessary. Female sexuality is still stigmatized as bad, and women who have sex are characterized as dirty, immoral or worse. You can see it at play in Harvey's book; you can see it at play in Rush Limbaugh's attack on Sarah Fluke and the wider birth control debate that's been going on in the U.S. at large; you can see it at play in any number of interactions between men and women. And when you take this kind of attitude to its extreme, you get craziness like this. Everyone should be selective of who they choose to share their bodies with, because health concerns are not male or female. Yet for some reason we continue to assign all shame and guilt to women when it comes to sex, and that's wrong.
I wrote this last October, so it's a little out of date.
I come back to this because of a discussion I had at work today. I was discussing the movie Think Like a Man with a coworker, and the reasons why I wouldn't be seeing it. The movie is based on the book Act Like a Lady, Think Like a Man by Steve Harvey. I haven't read the book, but I've heard enough about it to know that it's something that I'm not interested in reading (aside from the fact that it's not targeted at me in the first place).A few weeks ago, the story broke that Sarah Palin had a one night stand with Glen Rice in 1987. At the time I couldn't think of anything I cared less about, and believe me, I tried. As I made my internet news rounds though, I became surprised at just how many different organizations were covering the story, and at how absurd some of that coverage was. A few days later, my brother sent me this picture of Michelle Bachman in a pretty funny, but suggestive pose
Don't get me wrong; this is not a blog to defend these two nutcase right-wing harpies. Instead, I think that both of these instances (and hundreds of others) illustrate how we treat female sexuality. The coverage of Palin's sex life carries an implicit tone of disapproval: Gasp! An adult woman had consensual sex?! Stop the presses! I won't complain about that for too long though. Yes, we are all aware that there's a double standard in how male and female sexuality are portrayed. And yes, it would be a good thing for everyone if we treated men and women equally in all things, from sex to workplace pay and everything in between. Let's just concede those things to be true. My argument is this: it actually hurts men to stigmatize female sexuality. How, you ask?
Time for some lame anecdotal evidence!
I was talking to a female friend of mine recently, and we were discussing relationships. I told her that one of my goals for the month of October was to finally start dating, and to achieve that ultimate of all experiences, birthday sex (I think conjugal visit sex may be slightly more ultimate, but prison, so yeah). She said to me, "Is it wrong if that's one of my goals too? Does that make me a ****?" I told her it didn't, but she seemed less than convinced.
The point of this little story? Here we have an attractive, single woman looking to make the most out of her birthday. Despite the fact that she likes sex, LIKE WE ALL DO, she's probably not going to act on that urge because of how she's been made to feel about her own sexuality. The Palin and Bachman and dozens of other examples of female sexual stigmatization play right into the attitude that sex is wrong. And if women aren't having sex because they've been made to feel bad about it, guess who else isn't having sex?
That's right: men. Some guy might have gotten lucky on my friend's birthday. Looks a little unlikely now. Basically, we're not going to find women who are open and honest about their sexuality if we call them *****s every time that they are open. I'm not suggesting that one-night stands are necessarily a good idea, but we do all sorts of things that aren't good ideas. And besides, whether we're talking about someone you met in a bar or your fiance, sex is going to be better if the woman doesn't feel like a **** because she gives head or rides well. These are actual things that I've heard; it's the height of insanity that someone should be made to feel bad for giving someone else pleasure.
Do you want to get laid? Chances are you'll have a better shot if your potential sex partners don't think that giving you what you want makes them dirty.
The discussion at work centered around a particular anecdote from the book, where Harvey councils women who give it up on the first date, essentially telling them that no man will take them seriously if they have sex with them right off the bat. It sparked an interesting and humorous debate, but I was actually shocked at how readily so many people in our debate took Harvey's statement as axiomatic: a woman who has sex on the first date is not worth your respect. When we asked why this was true, none of the people who agreed with the claim had any substantive reason for feeling that way. They just did, because it was something that they'd been taught, and it had been confirmed over and over again throughout their lives.
I feel that this is problematic for several reasons, not the least of which is that we define the woman's worth by her (un)willingness to engage in consensual sexual activity on the first date, but we don't do the same for men. After all, don't both parties want it? Yet only one party suffers any stigma from the act, and it's always the woman who does. The above section in quotes is a tongue-in-cheek way to draw attention to this discrepancy, but after the conversation I had today, I felt a more direct approach is necessary. Female sexuality is still stigmatized as bad, and women who have sex are characterized as dirty, immoral or worse. You can see it at play in Harvey's book; you can see it at play in Rush Limbaugh's attack on Sarah Fluke and the wider birth control debate that's been going on in the U.S. at large; you can see it at play in any number of interactions between men and women. And when you take this kind of attitude to its extreme, you get craziness like this. Everyone should be selective of who they choose to share their bodies with, because health concerns are not male or female. Yet for some reason we continue to assign all shame and guilt to women when it comes to sex, and that's wrong.