Lord Viper
SS Rank
It can be blocked, and a good amount of attacks can break it like Samus's Charge Blaster full blast, (not sure about the smaller one's).What about just banning his neutral b?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It can be blocked, and a good amount of attacks can break it like Samus's Charge Blaster full blast, (not sure about the smaller one's).What about just banning his neutral b?
It's not the single move that's the problem; it's how the move is used. Using moves to a certain objective (I.E., infinite-caping, stalling, inf. chaingrabbing, etc.) in order to achieve a certain effect is sometimes banned.I don't think people ban single moves really. You ban the character or you don't. A technique maybe (infinite caping, wobbling) but not a single move :/ I don't think that has ever been done...
*looks at what self just said*You have got to be ****ing kidding me.
Yoshi doesn't do **** against MK though besides the chaingrab. It's not like he stands a chance, even with the CG...
Dont forget that a LOT of people play to win, so your going to see a lot of mk's...but ya I do believe its possible to beat him but its real hard atm imoMeta Knight, shouldn't, and hopefully will not be banned.
If he will, it will prove that we are all n00bs and can't take him on because he's "too strong",
which is plain BS.
And we aren't weak and pathetic, now are we? We can take on meta knight! If we want to, we can drag him accross the floor and chain grab him into oblivion!
You just need to know how. And we DO know how. So banning MK = BS
take away all of his b moves using the controller configurations?I don't think people ban single moves really. You ban the character or you don't. A technique maybe (infinite caping, wobbling) but not a single move :/ I don't think that has ever been done...
Lord, for a second I thought you were being serious. XDtake away all of his b moves using the controller configurations?
If you are a dedicated Brawler, in my opinion, you would stick with your main.Yea of coarse he can be beaten but, who would like to go to a tournament and just play MK's (I sure wouldn't) that would ruin the competitive scene it has not happened yet but at this rate it will. Everyone is starting to second or main him.
I don't agree with that thread and I main yoshi no character has a advantage specially yoshi.Lord, for a second I thought you were being serious. XD
Anywho, I found a thread discussing a potential Yoshi advantage vs. Meta Knight:
Right here.
He will be beaten but he still places in the top 8 consistently to much 2 or 3 or 4 places in the top a almost every tournament and wins to muchUnless he becomes something unbeatable then its no use to ban him.
Instead of doing this what should be done is a thread on tactics for each character on how to beat MK with each characters. Also what moves stop the tornado, how to punish his Up b. good edge guarding techs and so on. We have done that on PR and people are improving a lot. Hell in the last tournament a Peach won 1st place and **** he make her look top tier. ill upload the vid soon.
It's funny, first time I played brawl at a friends house, I had heard something about a character named mk, I was really interested in him just because of his name lol...anyways I liked him a lot but I was getting ***** in FFA with my friends and they said he sucked XD...now look where we are lolIf you are a dedicated Brawler, in my opinion, you would stick with your main.
I'd never leave Fox orSpammy McArrowPit.
The only reason I sort of secondary Meta Knight is because I played with him before he was cool.
Do you know what a scrub is? Because that is a very scrubby thing to say.If you are a dedicated Brawler, in my opinion, you would stick with your main.
I'd never leave Fox orSpammy McArrowPit.
The only reason I sort of secondary Meta Knight is because I played with him before he was cool.
First off, he said "imo" second, some people like some variety...then again if winning is what you only want, fine. But imo, Varitety+Playing to win=Most fun =)Do you know what a scrub is? Because that is a very scrubby thing to say.
If you play to win, you use whichever character gives you the best chance of winning. If that turns out to be MK, you use him. If you main Falcon but then switch to MK, there's nothing wrong with that. If you win something with MK, you walk away with more money than you would if you go in and get ***** as Falcon.
with money on the line who gives a d*mn about funFirst off, he said "imo" second, some people like some variety...then again if winning is what you only want, fine. But imo, Varitety+Playing to win=Most fun =)
No, I am not a scrub, I am just dedicated.Do you know what a scrub is? Because that is a very scrubby thing to say.
If you play to win, you use whichever character gives you the best chance of winning. If that turns out to be MK, you use him. If you main Falcon but then switch to MK, there's nothing wrong with that. If you win something with MK, you walk away with more money than you would if you go in and get ***** as Falcon.
as lilb93 said, "fun" isn't the number one priority in competitive play. Winning is. However, playing to win tends to be fun.First off, he said "imo" second, some people like some variety...then again if winning is what you only want, fine. But imo, Varitety+Playing to win=Most fun =)
I like money as much as the next person, but its gets pretty boring with only mk's...also, if people play smash JUST to win money and not for the game then I think you should quit smash in general...wtf is the point in playing a game just for money, go play poker or somethingwith money on the line who gives a d*mn about fun
QFTas lilb93 said, "fun" isn't the number one priority in competitive play. Winning is. However, playing to win tends to be fun.
And just because he said "imo" doesn't mean I can give him a free pass. If those are his opinions, then he has a scrub mentality.
EDIT: Foxtrotter, if you've read the Play to Win essay, then you obviously skipped the parts about scrubs. A scrub is somebody who doesn't play to win. A scrub plays with made up rules (aka 'honor')
People play for money because they know they can win and they will keep using MK until he is banned. Money can convince a lot of people to use a Character.I like money as much as the next person, but its gets pretty boring with only mk's...also, if people play smash JUST to win money and not for the game then I think you should quit smash in general...wtf is the point in playing a game just for money, go play poker or something
Giving MK "a bit of a challenge" is the best any character in this game can do, though. There's just no character that truly beats him. If the MK you're fighting is equally good/better than you, there's no way you'll win. Unless you play Snake.I'm an MK main. I am by far not the best with him, but MK is definitely beatable.
He dies from getting hit by a ****ing pillow. Spaced projectile spam also helps. Big, Heavy characters that have hard to interecpt recovery (Dedede, R.O.B.) also give him a bit of a challenge.
This is all from personal experianc though, so there are definately some holes in this.
This post was what really convinced me in thumb's thread. JC is too good.Jcaesar007 said:Why don't we stop looking at this from the point of view of "There's a slight chance MK won't be running every tournament a year from now" and instead think about how much the tournament scene would be enriched by the exclusion of MK.
At high level (nothing else matters, and if you don't play brawl at high level and go to tourneys please kindly stop posting here), MK has no counters or even matchups, and is in fact most characters' worst matchup. How many more characters would be tourney viable if MK was banned? How much more exciting and competitive and varied would the tournament scene be if MK was banned? Just think about these things.
Also, a ban would definitely NOT create a domino effect. Every other character in the game, even Snake and DDD, has bad matchups, regardless of tier.
Lastly I'd like you to really ask yourself, why is a ban impossible? We ban items and stages without a second thought. Why is banning a character such a big deal if it would make the tournament scene so much better?
It has nothing to do with the intentions of the creators of the game. If it were up to them we'd be playing on every stage for 2 minutes with items on. We fixed their game to make it more competitively viable. There is absolutely NO difference between fixing these things and removing a character with the same purpose in mind. You people really need to open your mind.
I understand what you mean...money is pretty poweful lol ;DPeople play for money because they know they can win and they will keep using MK until he is banned. Money can convince a lot of people to use a Character.
I think theres some rule or something where if only one character is being played its banned...not sure someone correct me if I'm wrongSo when the Metaknight is the only character that places in tourneys, not because he's unbeatable, but because he's so much easier to do well with, we're just gonna leave it like that?
He's not the only one being played... yet. I'd love to see him banned but I don't think it'll happen... At least, not yet.I think theres some rule or something where if only one character is being played its banned...not sure someone correct me if I'm wrong
I know but even without a tier list hes like over 90% of the contestants...imagine what it'll be once a tier DOES come out 0.oHe's not the only one being played... yet. I'd love to see him banned but I don't think it'll happen... At least, not yet.
Yoshi can CG Meta Knight.Except no one out ranges MK, no one can chain grab him, and no one can gimp him at low percents.
:D
How is abandoning Brawl competitive going to help its metagame? It's too soon to say it's hopeless.The fact that people are even considering banning MK just shows how unbalanced this game is. I think it's time that people just acknowledge that this game should not be played at a competitive level, because as of right now, the Brawl metagame is falling apart faster than the Melee one.
When Meta dominates in SP's sense from the OP - or is so close that everyone gets tired of the game anyway.Everyday I come to the Brawl boards hoping to find something good, and everyday it just gets worse. At what point and time does this game become unplayable?
that was the same for shiek when melee first came out. she was really good and had a lot of advantages over a lot of chars. then people got used to her and she got lowered on the teir list.you people just arent used to mk yet. not saying i am. once we are then MK wont be as difficult. and besides, the game hasnt even been out for a year. the metagames of some characters are hardly developed and once they are keeping MK in would only help those characters.I personally count the days until Meta is banned, but it won't be for quite some time after this.
I suggest that EVERYONE plays Meta Knight at tournaments, and when asked why, give the reason: "Because I have the best chance at winning when I play him."
Hopefully that'll speed up the banning process.
I don't hate Meta Knight, but I hate how easy it is to pick him up and win.
... People are considering Pit's arrows to be broken... ?Also your first argument is nothing more than argumentum ad populum, unless it's just poorly formed. Here, parity of argument: "The fact that people are even considering Pit's arrows to be broken just shows how unbalanced this game is." Doesn't work.