TheLastCacely
Smash Hero
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2009
- Messages
- 6,937
again...... why is mk still on top???
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Please elaborate on this statement. Do you think they are too high, or too low. Do you think they are in the wrong tier? Why Meta-knight and Marth?Pit, Ike, MK, Bowser, and Marth are the only glaring errors that bother me.
I was about to say something until I read the end.In Many Tourney Threads: WAH SONIC IS LOW TIER LET ME USE HIM
Strangely, it will all be from Kai.
Samus should be an amazing Smash character, from a design perspective.Unless other characters were 100% accurate to their games too. Metroid Samus would kill Metal Gear snake.
Oh and Zelda is pretty bad. A defensive character who can't force an approach. Even if you couldn't DI/tech her smashes she'd be in bad shape.
This is why I'm very disappointed that they decided not to have patches or anything. Samus is a couple of tweaks away from being at least mid tier.Samus should be an amazing Smash character, from a design perspective.
I don't know what they were thinking when they put her in the game.
...Meta Knight is quite agile and quick, with great grab range and air attacks. Plus all his specials can be used for recoveries. These factors makes him easy to win most of the match ups he's in. So that's why.again...... why is mk still on top???
Because just about every back room member agrees that he's the best in the game and about half of the community thinks he should be banned. Look at a few of the 7000 posts about him for more info.again...... why is mk still on top???
so in your logic, the other HALF of the community thinks he shouldn't be banned.Because just about every back room member agrees that he's the best in the game and about half of the community thinks he should be banned.
Sakurai made a very fun fighting game meant mainly to be enjoyed by normal players (not necessarily casual gamers but not tourney going people). He is a professional and didn't nerf certain characters because he doesn't like them. He's not a 12 year old boy making a video game who says "Link is teh gayz. Make him suk mor plez."This is how Sakurai makes his $$$. Nerf characters to his liking and stick em together. maybe one day he'll get it right and the tier list would be completely different.
My point is that there is a large concensus that he is the best character in the gameso in your logic, the other HALF of the community thinks he shouldn't be banned.
whats your point?
Yeah. Pretty much this.His point Mike was that if the community has a serious, actual discussion going on about whether to ban a character or not, chances are that character is at least the best in the game. That post wasn't "BAN MK" or anything dawg lol, he's just saying "Hey man, MK is still on top because it's kind of obvious he's the best. To further prove this, the community is in a discussion on whether to ban him or not, which is something you would not expect if the character was not obviously the best to begin with"
He could have worded it better, but yeah that's basically what he tried to say.
Well unfortunately people don't always communicate their ideas perfectly.you didn't say that,
After two years, him being good to point that half the community wants him banned, makes it evident that he belongs at the top.so in your logic, the other HALF of the community thinks he shouldn't be banned.
whats your point?
not in every game, no. but in brawl, MK deserves his own tierJust because hes the best in the game doesn't mean he's so much better than everyone else or deserves his own tier. It just means he gets spot #1
I agree with the SBR's decision to put him in his own tier.Just because hes the best in the game doesn't mean he's so much better than everyone else or deserves his own tier. It just means he gets spot #1
I was referring to design. Like Turbo said, based on design a lot of characters would be a lot more valuable. But not every one can be an astronaunt I guess...Sakurai made a very fun fighting game meant mainly to be enjoyed by normal players (not necessarily casual gamers but not tourney going people). He is a professional and didn't nerf certain characters because he doesn't like them. He's not a 12 year old boy making a video game who says "Link is teh gayz. Make him suk mor plez."
alot of people dont think sonot in every game, no. but in brawl, MK deserves his own tier
Ah ok. I gotcha. But I think for the most part the character design is right. Samus does feel a lot like she should to me based on the games, and so does Link. Ganon not so much since he's based on Falcon's moveset.I was referring to design. Like Turbo said, based on design a lot of characters would be a lot more valuable. But not every one can be an astronaunt I guess...
not the majority of players though. more people thinks he should be in his own tier rather than be in a tier with snakealot of people dont think so
A lot of important people DO think so though.alot of people dont think so
lol at thislink zelda and ganon are now all one great bigsadhappy family in the triforce tier now X3
pit mains in america need to look more closely to japanese pit mains, there is a reason he's top tier there....
Hellz yeah.I laugh at the people who think Lucario is Mid-Tier.
Us Lucarios will continue to help bring him up on the Tier List!
Can't combo me when I'm platform camping like a **** because I don't want to get infinited.Once ICs really start exploiting desync to combo into grabs out of stuff like Blizzard-walling, I think we'll see ICs in the same tier as MK.
As far as a character with a lot of untapped potential, I can't wait to see what kind of stupidity people manage to unsurface with them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZKBa6bvUjoSo many options, I feel I'm at a candy shop with happiness.