max_da_ling
Smash Cadet
Get out of my games Petey....
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Why don't you like Petey? I like him...Get out of my games Petey....
Feed MeI'm fine with Petey as a boss, but I think putting him as a playable character is a bit much. He's a sideliner: there to be seen, but not played (excluding party games).
BTW, does anyone think Petey and Audrey II look far too similar?
If you don't know who audrey II is, I suggest you go search Little Shop of Horrors.
who ever said that Petey being Playable means that Toad and Bowser Jr. can't be? they have more of a chance then Petey to begin with... I look at it like "if Petey can get in, then Toad and Bowser Jr. definatly can!".Ok. I DON'T hate Petey. I just don't want him playable over Toad and Bowser Jr. I'm okay with him being a boss, I think it will be fun to fight him.
Is that clear now?
You really think they're going to add THREE new Mario characters?who ever said that Petey being Playable means that Toad and Bowser Jr. can't be? they have more of a chance then Petey to begin with... I look at it like "if Petey can get in, then Toad and Bowser Jr. definatly can!".
Petey really didn't have much of a chance if you ask me... but now that he's in Brawl, I see no excuse for him not to be playable. he's playable in many other games, so it's not like Nintendo is apposed to the idea. he would be unique and interesting to play as, so it's not like there wasting there time. and if you don't like him, don't use him. it's that simple.
Sure, why not? Happened with Melee didn't it?You really think they're going to add THREE new Mario characters?
I think Sakurai is going for more balance with characters. Even if Dr. Mario is removed I don't think he will add three characters, plus Wario is kinda a Mario character (even though he reps WarioWare).Sure, why not? Happened with Melee didn't it?
Who's denying that he's in the game? His status as a playable character is what everyone's has been talking about for the past day now.Hey, anyone else who hates Petey, just look at this picture for a while
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
http://www.oxyborb.com/art/peteyinbrawl4real.bmp
he's in the game, and there's nothing you can do
just take a minute to ponder this
Geno should be in before all Mario characters, ever, period. As long as Geno has made it in, I personally don't care whether Petey is playable or not.
But he still sucks.
Double quoted for double truth. Geno owns Petey.Petey sucks pretty hard. Not quite as hard as Bowser Jr, but still enough to make Richard Simmons ***.
Okay, here's the thing. There are MANY Mario characters that deserve a spot more than Petey.why does everyone assume "Because A is in X, Y, and Z won't be" I think that at this point Sakauri could pull off anything he wants to do.
who said he wasn't? boss only character are an incredably stupid idea, and seeing as Petey has loads of potential, I see no reason why he would be only a boss. and as I said many before; if Petey's "just a boss" whats to stop them from making Ridley just a boss? how about King DeDeDe? heck! Bowser's most likely going to be a boss in Subspace mode, so why should he be playable and not the other boss characters, regardless of who they might be!? it really is a ridiculous thought!Petey isnt playable. Who said he was confirmed?
And how do you know this?Andross? Mother Brain? Those guys would never appear..
My sentiments exactly. Why does Nintendo keep trying to *figuratively* shove Petey down eveyone's throats?If Petey is in Brawl, I just hope to god he's only a boss and not a playable character, I wouldn't want plant vomit that's coming from a fighter who wears polka dotted spandex all over my favorite fighters...
LAWL.Petey sucks pretty hard. Not quite as hard as Bowser Jr, but still enough to make Richard Simmons ***.
who said he wasn't? boss only character are an incredably stupid idea, and seeing as Petey has loads of potential, I see no reason why he would be only a boss. and as I said many before; if Petey's "just a boss" whats to stop them from making Ridley just a boss? how about King DeDeDe? heck! Bowser's most likely going to be a boss in Subspace mode, so why should he be playable and not the other boss characters, regardless of who they might be!? it really is a ridiculous thought!
well, obviously Petey is major enough to be a boss. they could have easily made the first boss a giant Primid, but no! they chose Petey! that means they wanted him to be in the game in some way!Because Dedede, Bowser, and Ridley are major character in their franchises. Petey isn't.
I'd be pretty amazed it Toad got in now. Sure, I guess maaaaaybe he still has a chance, but it's a pretty slim one given that it's confirmed that he's still Princess Peach's B move.who ever said that Petey being Playable means that Toad and Bowser Jr. can't be? they have more of a chance then Petey to begin with... I look at it like "if Petey can get in, then Toad and Bowser Jr. definatly can!".
thats the best arguement I've heard so far. I supposed if thats the case then yes, then not every boss should be playable. then again, I wouldn't expect every boss to have a full move-set. for example: that one eyed cloud from the Kirby games. I would expect it to be a boss, but not to have a full move-set. I would expect it to fight like it does in the Kirby games, and swoop down and attack with lighting bolts... not playable character material. King Dedede though would have a full move-set, so he should be playable.I expect many, many bosses. At least two from each major franchise. So I don't think every boss will be playable.