HiddenBowser
Smash Master
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2007
- Messages
- 3,511
fixedi would say that JP will be top of E tier when bowyer goes back to her and starts resting MKs 6+ times per match
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
fixedi would say that JP will be top of E tier when bowyer goes back to her and starts resting MKs 6+ times per match
yeah.Its possible he's this game's Sheik, seen as the best for a good long while then declining over time due to other, more technically advanced characters being mastered and coming up to that level.
Its also possible he's just the best.
Only time will tell.
I think 3rd should either be G&W or D3...Cool although I don't think Falco really deserves 3rd...
Keep in mind that Falco and Dedede are only 0,11 apart... Neglicible difference, really.I think 3rd should either be G&W or D3...
Apparantly not only him but others (Boxob, for example).Da Kid got banned?
maybe it's that zelda has no trouble with her and that I don't do so well with her that clouds my judgement... hell, for that reason alone I long thought DDD should be lower than he is.@Sonic the Hedgedawg:
I think ZSS is right on and could even move higher. She's a pretty strong character.
Do any SBR members that voted have an explanation for why Sheik/Zelda isn't included?
Saying no offense doesn't make it less offensive @_@LOL. So true. I think the entire Sonic boards can be closed now, the matter is concluded (no offense to Sonic mains).
Well, as far as I remember is Zelda one of ZSS' more even matchups (with a slight advantage for Zelda), so I have no doubts you could beat a ZSS with your Zelda, especially if that ZSS player doesn't know what he does.maybe it's that zelda has no trouble with her and that I don't do so well with her that clouds my judgement... hell, for that reason alone I long thought DDD should be lower than he is.
If you really must know...Do any SBR members that voted have an explanation for why Sheik/Zelda isn't included?
Ankoku said:Are we going to actually combine Zelda and Sheik this time around? Because I really hate forcing them to be considered as separate characters that lack a down+B.
Marc said:Ankoku: We didn't do it last time, I don't see a need to do it this time. You can consider changing a tool your character has, but they are two completely different characters and you never have to switch if you don't want to.
Ankoku said:You don't have to switch, but how do you account for the fact that you can switch immediately from an unfavorable matchup (Sheik vs Ice Climbers) to a favorable one (Zelda vs Ice Climbers) as a simple "tool?" And would that place Zelda and Sheik right next to each other, since this "tool" allows them to basically have the best of both matchups?
I don't get it.
And so we didn't put Zelda and Sheik together.Marc said:You just judge both characters on their individual merit, so no, it wouldn't place them right next to each other. If it confuses you, just forget about the down+B. In Melee you always knew switching from Zelda to Sheik would be a huge tier jump, it didn't make Zelda top tier and we always went with them being separate characters. Admittedly, switching is more viable in Brawl, but I for one can't think of them as one character.
the hgher tier u play the biggr ur **** is
i ment ur v-jay -_-thats not true...
Im black, which means I automatically have a big package, yet i play 7th from the bottom...
most of us use both zelda AND sheik. switching between the two throughout the match or staying whichever matchup is more favourable. Really, Zelda/Sheik is its own character and it's much better than either of the two alone.There should probably be entries for Zelda, Sheik, and Zelda+Sheik. Maybe we just didn't want to bother? I don't know. But I think the individual entries are more important than Zelda+Sheik as one entry.
I just wanna emphasize this point.Really, Zelda/Sheik is its own character and it's much better than either of the two alone.
This. I feel it'd be more comfortable with everyone if there was Zelda, Shiek, then Zelda/Shiek. There's definately players that don't switch between the two, just as there are players who consistently change forms.Keep in mind I'm not saying Zelda+Sheik shouldn't be listed.
Agreed. Shouldn't have his own tier either. Same tier as snake, IMO.Nice to have a new tier list... But i disagree with many points...
[*] MetaKnight having a 15/15. He has one weakness : His light weight. Plus, projectiles can be annoying for him on flat stages (FD). A score like 14.50 would have been more accurate.
But i certainly like this new tier list as a whole
15/15 means every person ranked him #1 in the game.... how is he not clearly the best? are you saying you want people to misvote so he'll have a less broken looking rating?Agreed. Shouldn't have his own tier either. Same tier as snake, IMO.
Have you ever played a good falco laser spammer?Cool although I don't think Falco really deserves 3rd...
But it doesn't reflect how well good they when used as one Character...I don't see whats wrong with Sheik and Zelda as separate. While you are Sheik you are this good, and while you are Zelda you are this good. That's what its saying.
But yeah, also putting an additonal spot for using both of them to factor in the higher chance of success you'll have by using both characters can't hurt..I agree.
I didn't say listing them separately provides all the information you could possibly want. I said it's more informative than ONLY listing them together. Again, and I wonder if you caught this the first time, I'm not saying that Zelda+Sheik shouldn't be on the list. I'm not even sure why we didn't put that listing in.no. it's not more informative because the avearge person would assume that zelda/sheik would be in roughly the same placement as Zelda and Sheik are alone.
I guess in the whole discussion about the placings, etc., this little part was overlooked.I'm not even sure why we didn't put that listing in.