Maybe it has been mentioned before, but I don't see it be mentioned in alot of posts about whether Lucina is strictly useable when Marth exists.
I think people are not talking about the biggest factor in the lucina vs marth argument and it's one of the most important too. Lucina has the same shield stun and knockback as marths TIPPER across her entire sword. This makes it so that as long as lucina hits her opponents shield, it is way harder to punish her no matter how she spaces compared to a marth misspacing. This is so valuable since marcina deals with shields ALOT.
Lucinas not any worse than marth, and definitely does not deserve to be placed several tiers lower than him. In realistic play lucina may actually be better. Marth just has higher highs but lower lows.
I think people are not talking about the biggest factor in the lucina vs marth argument and it's one of the most important too. Lucina has the same shield stun and knockback as marths TIPPER across her entire sword. This makes it so that as long as lucina hits her opponents shield, it is way harder to punish her no matter how she spaces compared to a marth misspacing. This is so valuable since marcina deals with shields ALOT.
Lucinas not any worse than marth, and definitely does not deserve to be placed several tiers lower than him. In realistic play lucina may actually be better. Marth just has higher highs but lower lows.