Recent content by Pathetiqu3

The game is of course playable, but it could be better. Tripping would instantly be gone, and there's 3-4 of my friends already playing brawl again right there. Then MK could get surgically altered, suddenly my MK-maining friend is playing again too. The rewards are astronomically higher than...

I don't agree with it being patched into oblivion, but more importantly I want to state that I believe a developer that tries and does not entirely succeed is much better and more deserving of gamer attention than one that ignores and even sabotages his own games.

Everyone should care about a balanced game, or am I in the wrong subforum? Mods are the easiest, most precise, and most mature choice in that regard. Or at least were. Regardless of how you want to call it, sometimes that community should be able to say "okay, we need to do this our own way."...

You should tell the people who get paid to live, eat, and breath SC2 that it's a joke. Or David Kim or the countless others at Blizzard who put more hours than anyone here would ever with anything in their lives. Brawl may be dead, and I may criticize its community's decisions, but I would...

And you're still really ********. Street Fighter has a CARING dev team that WANT balance. So does Tekken. Smash does not. You just don't get it, and I don't think you will. The community taking this game into their own hands is the only way that this party game ever got noticed by big...

You didn't even bother to respond to a post directly responding to your own. Now you cherry-pick comments that strengthen your argument. You really are ********.

Oh really? I remember a few changes that were quite significant. Also, no bonjwa lasted more than a year. How long has M2K been sitting on his throne again? The starcrafts are a perfect example of 0 homogeny and beautiful balance. Smash has never had a caring dev.

Or maybe you're just wrong, stupid, and spouting words that you were told rather than ones you thought. One or two communities does not equal the whole. Any computer gamer would never tolerate a situation like brawl's.

Any matchup that's not 50/50 is a tragedy of balance and you are terribly misinformed and ignorant to believe that it is okay.

I've been a part of plenty of competitive communities: Melee, Brawl, WoW, SC2, Pokemon, MtG, and plenty of outdated or niche other games. I think that qualifies me to have a say on it. Even the most hyper-competitive games with communities 10x larger and 10x more intense pro gamers are...

What is this ****? Your opinion is ********.

Nope. Maybe you're just bad at explaining.

I'm not going to argue you using debate rules. Take what I say and consider it, then respond based on your consideration. Don't argue its relevance to me. Unless you don't care to respect the opinions of others. If that's the case, fine, you're right. I have lost the debate, but offer the loser...

No one is forcing you to dodge my response.

No, I can't see why don't use a "it's not fun" ban criteria. I wouldn't really care if Ganondorf had an extra stock, or if Samus began with extra damage (she kind of does as Zamus). I wouldn't really have cared if we had supported the mod community more openly, or if we played on entirely...