One to the short version of Ron's post:
This is wrong. You mean that cheesecake is weak and inactive?{/QUOTE]
Not as inactive as others, but weak? Hell yes.
Swords was inactive when I started my case against him?
No, but he sure as hell was weak, same as always for him.
Congratulations! In a game of going after all the inactives, you haven't gone after one. We'll be sure to keep note of that connection.
So yeah, that parts total BULL****.
I pointed out some inactives, after four days of not participating and no strong wagons had started with only three days left of voting. I don't see that as being scummy, I see that as if we cannot get a strong read for scum, then at least get rid of nonparticipants. Also, I mentioned that I am very paranoid about inactives after Newbie 3.
Ok fine, but WE are back now, why are you still tryna get us lynched? Why aren't you pursuing Nix after his crap about "Lynch Me!"? What about others? People have done scummy things today, but you'd rather go after the inactives?
Mostly I have urged inactives to participate much like other players in this game. I have gone after most of the players, because I keep changing my mind. That is going to happen when you don't know who's town and who's scum and your opinion should change as you get more information. Tunneling is not productive.
I agree with this part.
Why does this make you uncomfortable? It's not like the whole game the only thing I have done is parrot others with "Me too" statements. I have made posts and when doing a reread saw that we had made similar posts.
Because of the way it happens. Doing a reread on someone you think is scummy? You NEVER have managed to finish the reread. But suddenly someone asks you to reread on Soviet and later that day you are finished and think he's town? That makes me uncomfortable.
And no, you generally haven't been parroting, but when someone asks you to give a stance, you have 90% of the time justified it with others views. Case in point why you're on the cheeze lynch. "People I think are town are on the wagon." Swords lynch? You "got off" because others thought he was dumb town, but when that sentiment faded you got on because "People said he was too experienced to be dumb town." See where I'm coming from?
Like calling a female him? And then randomly remembering and switching to the female pronoun? Because you did that throughout your attack against me after I said in a post I am female. Everyone makes mistakes. I don't think I've made any major ones that require to get me lynched.
A) Generally happens because most people on the internets are guys, so when typing fast I tend to type he instead of she. Deal with it, it's not random, it's when I notice I've typed the wrong pronoun and changed it.
B) Those are NOT the type of mistakes I'm talking about. I'm talking about when you find someone scummy, they shut you down, and then you say "Oh, sorry I forgot that". Those are the kind of mistakes Im talking about. Like with Swords case.
Praxis DID NOT like Cheese. I made a typo which Dr Riddler asked about and I clarified.
Actually, looking back, I realize I misread 426. You say "Also, I did point at Cheesecake's own actions that I personally found suspicious. So either, you're skimming or you're trying to make me look scummy by misconstruing me." Which I though you meant as "I'm going after Cheezecake, who Praxis liked, so Im not parroting!" My apologies.
It's that whole voting against you, isn't it?
Yes, that is partially it. As I have explained now at LEAST 10 times, you go after the inactives and the weak, of which we were included when you came at us.
I also find it ridiculous you note that Nix's "Lynch me" post was bad play, yet somehow I am more priority than him.
I don't understand why Nix did that, but I do know it was ridiculous, so I'm leaving him for now. And yes, you are a higher priority than him to me, because to me, he is inactive, which is scummy, but no substitute for those actually scummy. Like you.
I found Ron's post against me intentionally trying to shed me in a bad light. There is nothing "negative" he found that not at least one other player has done this game.
A) I noted several times in my long post things that I agreed with and thought were pro-town. Which you would know had you read it.
B) The thing about cases is they aren't on just one point or one example, its the multitude of times you've done it. Sure, other players have gone after inactives or weak players at some point, but you have done it to almost ALL of the weak or inactive players. Sure, other people have been flip floppy, but either not as much as you have, or haven't been going after easy targets like you. It's the summation of the parts, not the individual parts.
Oh, and the theory I had about Ron and Jungle. Remember I said it was strange we had two roles who have DONE NOTHING THIS WHOLE GAME at the time of my post? There have been almost no wagons this whole game because no one is giving off scum vibes. Even voting has been sparse. I really think it is because both inactive players are scum.
A) There aren't a ton of scum vibes flyin around, but the ones that are there are sufficient enough that we shouldn't be trimming the fat.
B) We have made useful posts, we just had a stream of 4-5 days where we were not posting, so stop trying to make us seem worse than we are.
Still comfy on tandora for now.
