lol I did the same thing. if you expect us to read 100 pages of comments before contributing what the purpose of the thread is, you're sadly mistaken.
You didn't even read a single post before contributing and you contributing nothing but your opinion. Now, it's fine to contribute with one's opinion, but it is also prudent to at least back up one's opinion with any kind of
facts instead of just saying "I believe Brawl is more balance".
Well, good for you. Why should this matter to the debate?
Why do you believe Brawl is more balanced? On what do you base your opinion/stance? People waltzing in here stating their opinion flat out without any facts to support themselves or even an elaboration of their stance (as in anything more than just "Brawl is more balanced!") do not really contribute anything to the debate or the thread.
my definition of balanced is a game where all players can compete at an equal level despite the characters of their opponents. Brawl contains too many infinites cgs and dreadful final smashes to be "balanced"
This is a start.
masmasher: speaking of lack of logic, it's highly impractical to read thousands of post to make one. that would be pointless. This thread was meant to determine which game was more balanced, and a "vote" counts as contribution. to say that I do not know what I am talking about is to condemn yourself as it is foolish to toss around insults without base or reason to support them. If you spend hours before every post you make on a thread that's fine by me, but don't expect others to and insult them if they do not as it is not a good management of time or wit.
Not really, after approximately 100 pages, a "vote"-post counts as
spam. You're not helping us determine which game is more balance by simply "voting". This is a
fact based debate, not an
opinion poll.
Also, if you don't bother to read back even one page when there's been almost 100 pages written on the subject (+ the thread that came before it), chances are, the stuff you're about to say isn't new. It will already have been said a jillion times over, possibly already refuted a jillion times over.
No, waltzing into a thread that has close to 100 pages (at the time of your first post in this thread) and writing a 1-sentence blurb with no facts to back yourself up is
not contributing, it is
spamming.
What is game balance (especially the "balance" spoken of in the OP and subsequently debated in this thread? The
overall/
total sum of balance between each and every character in the game in relation to every other character in the game.
So it is not merely the number of viable characters but also the number of viable characters in relation to the number of unviablbe characters + the overall balance between every single character, viable or unviable. When comparing two games' balance, we have to first weigh every character in each game against every other character in the same game.
so everything in the last 100 pages is good information?
This was not what he said. Even as a joke, this falls flat because you are, as usual,
strawmanning someone/hallucinating/making **** up.
Neither of the games are balanced. There's the on topic for ya.
Irrelevant.
So far, in brawl, there are more characters that have the potential to win a tournament than Melee.
No there's not. Then again, you most probably believe Peach is a viable character with the potential to win major tournaments.