PottyJokes
Smash Apprentice
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2008
- Messages
- 183
how to be skillful : never win a tournament wiht decent competition like roneblaster. now thats skill!
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Im sorry but if somebody wobbled 8 times in a row, either the played a noob or they just impressed me by landing 8 solid grabs on a good player. Lol you really hate wobbling dont you. Im telling you man, just say "Wobblings mad gay, but I can understand why it doesnt warrant a ban" **** is soo unbeatable. You get half the ppl back to your side because you spoke the truth and they are thinking.... yea wobbling is pretty gay if it happened to me lol.wobbling 8 stocks out of a possible 8 isnt very skillful.
im not saying anymore because everyone knows its true.
at least someone hasn't lost their youth <3 it's kinda nice to see ^^F is for fire that burns down the whole town.
U is for uranium... BOMBS!
N is for no survivorrrrrrs....
and W is for Wobbling is fine.
Of course. PS picked a solid counter pick and played the match up according to the stage. He'd have been foolish to play it any other way. Camping is legit. It was something mango couldn't deal with as well as PS could do it, so PS was the better player in that match.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5u39LxgyuI
i guess pink shinobi was just more skilled than mango this match.
At the end of the day the metagame should be defined by utilizing everything in your ability to win. Since most players avoid camping against ice climbers and jigglypuff, the metagame suffers and everyone johns. Your personal limitations should not affect your views of the metagame.People who get grabbed and throw their hands in the air and say "IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO ESCAPE" instead of going, "what got me grabbed and how can I avoid it?" will continue to get ***** until the end of time.
Let me try to interpret this statement. "Wobbling is not a true skill strategy. Ice climbers have a one combo kill that is not a demonstration of skill. I go for one hit kills all the time"planking and wobbling are not true skill strategies.
OHKOs are cheap in general, which is why I go for them so much in Melee. A lot of my melee strategy revolves around OHKO
Do you ever get pissed with so many people saying you have "no skill"?Do what works, I suppose.
...Not much else I can really input on this topic, unless anyone has a question for me?
I guess my last 40 tournaments were a coincidence then.Do you ever get pissed with so many people saying you have "no skill"?
*takes note* I'll give it a try.I guess my last 40 tournaments were a coincidence then.
I don't see IC's as unbeatable....not one bit.
I'm guessing it's because I play Jiggs?
And for those struggling with wobbling who main like fox, falco, falcon, sheik, etc...
Try jabbing. Just press A when you're in front of them (properly spaced). ESPECIALLY with Falco.
It makes a successful wobble quite tricky to pull off.
It's a good thing you made a big bold post so people could see it.Wobbling is just like Shine spiking.
Wobbles=death
Shine spike = death
Wobbles = difficult to set up
Shine spike = difficult to set up
Shine spike = 3 frames of you in pain, then you watch yourself fall to your death
Wobbles = about 1800 to 3600 frames of you in pain, then you watch yourself fly to your death
WHAT! 3600! THERE'S NO WAY THAT CAN BE LEGAL!!!
kicking somebody in the nuts is a ***** move. but stop being stupid, you are fighting. the point is to win. I think 2v1, curb stomping, kicking somebody while down, jumping ppl are all pretty foul, but it happens.I totally disagree with this topic. It is not so cut and dry as winning is winning - respect it! In a fist fight, between two people who are pissed at each other enough to come to blows, it is still considered a major foul to kick somebody in the nuts. There are unspoken rules in EVERY type of game, that are expected to be followed. The Tim Duncan metaphor was horrific. This is not a battle of flash versus fundamentals, this is a battle of fundamentals against exploitative strategy. Pink Shinobi would be a la holding the ball until time ran out in the game before the shot clock was invented (go figure, they implemented a rule to stop that!).
I think, if you ARE allowed to wobble, you do deserve all the **** and hate ur gonna get for it. There IS such thing as playing the right way in all games because rules can only go so far without completely up-ending the game itself. Please don't try to make a case for being respected for wobbling or planking because the bottom line is: it's a ***** move.
actually, the topic is about being good.This topic is about respect, not about tourney rules.
So are the arguements everwhere in the PAL vs NTSC and the wobbling debates. It's stupid. I just jump in, say something really stupid, watch a bit, the forget it for a day or two.Maybe I'll jump into one of these topics I don't care about. Or maybe caring about doing what I do in these threads is considered caring about the topic. But yeah, everyone on these stupid argument threads are stupid. Feel free to include me in my statement because I don't care about what anyone thinks when they read this. barlw is a fun game when heavy gravity and reflect status are on, and MetaKnight's banned.JK, you're dumb, that's a stupid argument.
Why is it cheap? It is hard for IC to get a synced grab if the opponent isn't playing stupidly. It is just a severe punishment for missing.wobbling was banned though. I will go as far as to say Wobbles probably loses to Zhu in the absence of wobbling. It would still probably be close though. I wouldn't bet money on it thats for sure. However If such a tactic really makes that big of a difference then why unban it. Chu dat has done extremely well without it so he has my infinite respect. I've seen him take out 2 stocks with Popo alone. That pretty much shows me you don't need something like that to win It's just a cheap move that causes some players to win against people they cannot beat without it. That to me destroys the idea of a competition entirely.
Your monsters are still trapped inside the Chaos Shield! Behold as your fortress of darkness crumbles atop them! You've built yourself into a corner, Panik! Beyond your veneer of terror and shadows, you were simply a coward hiding inside walls. Observe in your despair - even your walls have turned against you!But you have to wait a turn for your Swords of Revealing Light to go away because it's currently holding up the castle!
And who makes these rules? You? The people who say that edgeguarding is unfair and cheap and you should let people get back on the stage? You throw edgeguarding in and the game becomes drastically more interesting. I played with a guy who accused me of using "gay Fox ****" when I shined him off the level. The stuff you see all day long in tournaments, the average scrub will ***** and complain about endlessly. What separates you from that average scrub? What makes Fox's shinespikes NOT gay but Puff's camping gay? What makes an infinite gay when it's totally okay to zero to death somebody with Sheik's CG? What makes it okay for M2K to completely deny all Falcon players a shot at 1st place because he's willing to absolutely slaughter them in a horrific counter matchup, but it's not okay for HBox to b-air people and rest them from jab resets? If you can elucidate for me a reasonable criteria for these differences beyond "NO IT'S GAY AND YOU'RE GAY," then I'd be willing to sit down and listen to you. You can't draw the line for me anywhere, you just pick things at random based on what you like.This topic is about respect, not about tourney rules.
You don't kick in the nuts if you want any respect from anyone after a fight, and it's not an honest victory if you win like that.
When money is on the line, some people will do whatever it takes to win. They don't necessarily deserve the same respect for their wins.
At the end of the day they have their money, and their fellow sell outs to make them feel better about themselves. If you want respect, play the right way imo (there IS a right way to play, again, in all games/sports/etc), if you don't care about respect, just keep doing what you're doing.
Leaves are green, money is green.Leaves are mostly made of cellulose, money is mostly made of cellulose. Leaves grow on trees, Money grows on...oh waitIf wobbling is banned, camping should be banned. They are pretty much the same. Both are fairly easy overall, yet to perfectly execute it and set them up, there's a lot of things that need to happen.
But Rog, I agree with your statement, even if you/others consider it a stupid argument. But I didn't know it was three frames hitlag. o-o
As Niko said before Camping is like Holding the ball before the shot clock was invented. If the shock clock or there was no play clock in NFL Someone could score and then not do anything for 1 hour or so and there would be nothing the other team could do. I mean you could say DON'T GET SCORED ON but that is a dump statement. Same goes with this game. I'm all for adding a stall limit to the game. Even if it isn't exactly like a sports clock. Say you can plank/Camp characters down to the last 2 minutes of a match. That would be more fair to me.If wobbling is banned, camping should be banned. They are pretty much the same. Both are fairly easy overall, yet to perfectly execute it and set them up, there's a lot of things that need to happen.
seriously?Why is it cheap?....etc
You're dumb. You're a stupid argument.It's a good thing you made a big bold post so people could see it.
JK, you're dumb, that's a stupid argument.
That doesn't change the fact that they ARE alike in some aspects. Who's to say they're not alike in respect to the characters' metagames? Nothing's going to be EXACTLY the same as something else. It's like distance - the d(x) will not equal d(y) unless x = y. Unless the two things being compared are the same, it's not going to be the same.Leaves are green, money is green.Leaves are mostly made of cellulose, money is mostly made of cellulose. Leaves grow on trees, Money grows on...oh wait
Just because things are alike in some respects, does not mean they are alike in all respects.
silly arguement is silly.