Climax11
Smash Ace
Well the more I thought about it the more Tommster had some good points, although I don't fully agree with his disagreement of me.
Truthfully, I think every tournament can be used in the PR decissions, but really only the larger, pre confirmed attendance tournys really have a good amount of pull to them.
People complaining "well in our six person tourny I owned #10 on the list so do I get to move up from #13" or people taking into account "once upon a time I beat so and so in a money match, I should be higher" are just kind of ridiculous. This information can though, obviously be helpful if it's passed along to the community and the panelists in an intellegent way.
The more I think about it the more saying PR Sanctioned is just kind of ridiculous, but I can understand how it makes people want to come to tournies more, knowing that it will effect there standing if they do manage to ****. Maybe labeling PR Sponsored to an event that gets (or is estimated to get) over 8/10/12 attendies will have people that are browsing take a second to look and reazlie who's all going to be there. Outside of that though, I can't see the lable PR Sponsored meaning much else, so it might be a worthless tag.
Truthfully though, the way PR Sanctioned is now, all people can really do is stop *****ing, show up to a tournie or two a month, wether its expected to be huge or not (which will help the turn out of the event, and quality of the bracet results recorded), and instead of saying "I'm better than you", come show everyone at that tourney just how good you are. If nothing else small tournies could count towards tie breakers on the PR List.
@ Binx - I have to agree, while I don't know how realistic it is, I think having the panelists regions spread out can be nothing but a plus. I don't think it should be a requirement, but maybe just an added perk when looking at canidates.
Truthfully, I think every tournament can be used in the PR decissions, but really only the larger, pre confirmed attendance tournys really have a good amount of pull to them.
People complaining "well in our six person tourny I owned #10 on the list so do I get to move up from #13" or people taking into account "once upon a time I beat so and so in a money match, I should be higher" are just kind of ridiculous. This information can though, obviously be helpful if it's passed along to the community and the panelists in an intellegent way.
The more I think about it the more saying PR Sanctioned is just kind of ridiculous, but I can understand how it makes people want to come to tournies more, knowing that it will effect there standing if they do manage to ****. Maybe labeling PR Sponsored to an event that gets (or is estimated to get) over 8/10/12 attendies will have people that are browsing take a second to look and reazlie who's all going to be there. Outside of that though, I can't see the lable PR Sponsored meaning much else, so it might be a worthless tag.
Truthfully though, the way PR Sanctioned is now, all people can really do is stop *****ing, show up to a tournie or two a month, wether its expected to be huge or not (which will help the turn out of the event, and quality of the bracet results recorded), and instead of saying "I'm better than you", come show everyone at that tourney just how good you are. If nothing else small tournies could count towards tie breakers on the PR List.
@ Binx - I have to agree, while I don't know how realistic it is, I think having the panelists regions spread out can be nothing but a plus. I don't think it should be a requirement, but maybe just an added perk when looking at canidates.