Why do U know, that reaper isnt that good? Did one of U guys, which rate him, play him?
Or Gheb, did U play jumpman and reaper?
If U watch vids of the players U cant really say that one of them looks much better or sth. like that.
I dont think, that reaper is that good, too.
But I dont think that U simply can beat him or armada.
There just arent any proofs atm, so nobody should say, that reaper will easily get ***** by Jumpman.
Armada is still one of the guys, which got big chances to win TSL Brawl.
Oh and: I know that a lot of U guys are thinking, that reaper just spams up b etc.
But he really doesnt spam it, if his enemy starts to punish it.
And U shouldnt rate germany bad, if no germans played guys out of other countires, except a small amount of players at SMACK.
And dont forget that there are players like Luigi_Player and Koukyn, which did really good at tourneys in their region, but which werent at SMACK. (I count LP as german, because the most swiss and austria players are part of the german community)
Just stop rating players, if there arent any proofs.
If Armada gets ***** at TSL, then U maybe can say, germany sucks, because Armada wins a big tourney there, but he looses to a lot of players from other countries.
Wait for proofs, k?
first possibility: Wolf sucks and he doesnt stand a chance vs. MK
second possibility: there arent much good Wolfs in america and thats why the MU isnt represented in reality (the best MKs win vs. the best Wolfs, maybe because the Wolf players are worse than the MKs)
I wont rate this MU 60:40, until I got some proofs
for me there are this two possibilities and I want to see proofs (not theorie stuff, pratical stuff), before I rate this MU better