This isn't even a question...while I agree waiting for Apeix, Devestation, and Genesis results would be more optimal, do you really think the results will be any different? Largly the same people are going to be there. They are expensive tournies. Combine that with the WHOBO results, you're kidding yourself if you think there's going to be any difference.
The "top player happening to play a top character" argument was dead on arrival, why is it still being used. M2K's "He wins because other charatcers haven't developed yet" argument made me literally LOL.
He breaks the game, and forces other to use him to just stand a chance. Ban him, so we can get back to enhancing the metagame. Because even around here, people are either picking up Metaknight, or quitting because of MetaKnight.
It's not fair that we have to eviscerate a character so easily without respect to the people that main him. The only way we can rectify this is if we have a **** good backing on Banning him.
See, I can sympathize with this, I really do. However, there are 2 problems with this:
1) It was pretty obvious even early on that MK was too powerful. Less time would have been lost if would have been banned earlier. Maybe not a fair argument giving the time it take to develop the metagame, but...
2) Even so, the hours the MK players will lose is far outwieghed by all the people who DON'T play him, and who at best have a 50:50 chance against him. Trust me, I'd bet money on the fact that Brawl community and metagame is SHRINKING, not growing, because of him alone. Hell, it's happening around here.
Thank christ NM is a smart enough state to re-ban him after Genesis. We're pretty much divorcing ourselves from SBR.