Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I dunno. That was before I owned the thread and I doubt Ill will come back to explain.
I hope you realize that realistically, MK isn't our worst top tier MU and that he tends to diminish the presence of our other, worse MUs (like Falco).He's only banned at Impact's because the TO is amain.
. Seriously you camp like mad in friendlies </3
diddy list, keitaro isn't even #1 diddy and he needs to be
yeah with that logic you make it sound so one sided and you can't argue with people who use this pathetic excuse, well WE DON'T GO TO TOURNAMENTS WHO BAN META KNIGHT but we still have the right to complain about it.
had to get that plug eh?Stop using this thread to rant about MK you ****ing tools, stay on topic and follow me on Twitter @ ThePhenomenalEE
Jeez.
SoulPech should be number 1 Jigglypuff.
:D. I'm okay with this.
You just wanted to sound smart by using a bunch of big words. You ain't Verm son. Your opinions have always been super biased.
gets thwomped by and that's your fault for using him. Get better. Quit complaining. is completely linear. They go for the grab. That is all. isn't easy and that had nothing to do with what I said about him. You completely negated the hardness of approaching him. can't kill with lasers, but that also had nothing to do with what I said. DOES have a better camp game then . just has a better approach game. should be banned to make the game "Fun and Fair" towards competitive play disgusts me. Stay free.Why am I dumb? Because his post sounded smarter grammatically/big words usages, but was just filled with intense bias? Did you READ what he posted or just skim through it?
So both sides give their personal opinions, but now it's being biased?
Pane with the best post. Thanks Andrew. That's all that had to be said.
He didn't win. He just used strawmanning in his post.
No, not that. I've known quest for years. He's always posted like an arrogant fool. Look at his sig even.
like REALLY??????? 
Thank you Mekos.
I always post with proper grammar. This is not a first. You, on the other hand, have consistently demonstrated that you possess a limited mastery of compositional English. If you insulting my academic capacity isn't the pot calling the kettle black, I don't know what is. In addition, do not insinuate that I would ever try to sound like anyone else. I am a unique individual who is not afraid to stand alone in order to do what is right, as in the case of the MK issue.
You're not helping your own cause. You don't even have a basic understanding of the words you use. Opinions are always biased. That is what makes them all unique. Whereas I am crafting an argument, you are listing off personal anecdotes and vilifying me in an unsuccessful attempt to prove the false idea that an MK ban is illogical. Moreover, you are making a number of assumptions about me that (yet again) are irrelevant to the topic of whether it is logical to ban MK.Your opinions have always been super biased.
This yet another instance of an unwarranted attack and an ad hominem logical fallacy. You are failing to remain within the bounds of the discussion. Your comment is irrelevant. Even its content has no meaning: complaining has nothing to do with my argument that banning MK is logical, and MK has an advantage over all characters, not just Toon Link.
Ask any high level ICs player and you will discover that there is much more to the character. This is an implausible oversimplification.
This comment supports my argument...if I " completely negated" what you said before, then, fantastic! That's what I meant to do! It's good that you admit you were wrong and see that Olimar's fatal flaw puts him significantly below MK in competitive viability, even when it is difficult to approach him (sometimes).Gimping
No, it was absolutely relevant to your assertion that Falco just runs away. He uses lasers when he runs away, does he not? However, he cannot run away for the entire match because he has to get in close quarters to kill.
I can see where this is going. You're not going to provide any evidence (because there is none to support your invalid claims). Hence, I am going to take the rest of this to PMs or VMs with people who would like to discuss the issue rationally with me. You are not the person with whom I care to discuss the issue any further, primarily because you have proven incapable of raising any relevant evidence at all.
This is another ad hominem logical fallacy, mixed with personal anecdotes that are not applicable to your defense of an MK legal ruleset.The fact that you said
Funnily enough, you have repeatedly labeled me as "biased," but you have neglected to cite any errors in the text. I wonder why. Oh wait, I know why: because your entire argument rests on the invalid premise of the aforementioned circular reasoning. You have reiterated your fallacious claims without any supporting evidence. Aristotle defined the argument in terms of two parts: the claim and the supporting evidence, the latter of which you have shown none. Therefore, your argument is incomplete and holds no significance.
Quite the opposite: you are the one who is committing the straw man logical fallacy. It is evident that you are unaware of the word's meaning, so I shall enlighten you.
You ought to be ashamed of yourself. You, of all people, labeling me as an "arrogant fool" is a malicious lie and an example of hypocrisy to the highest degree. The only way one may perceive me as arrogant would be by interpreting my last few posts as condescending when replying to you. I was merely trying to explain the errors of your statements and your ways of thinking about this subject. More importantly, I am not a fool. It is inappropriate and unfair for you to describe me as such. I am perfectly capable of discussing any controversial topic calmly and rationally. It takes two to tango: I have not responded to your slander with more slander for a reason. Do not provoke me and then attempt to depict me as belligerent. It will not work.
Firstly, I apologize to the other members of the thread if I have strayed from the topic of top 5 players. As I have stated, I will continue the discussion with those who are interested through VMs and PMs. However, I will not tolerate it when people like Seagull put their final defense in a thread and follow up right afterward with a post that urges the public to get back on topic, conveniently right in time to prevent the other party from replying. Do not do this again as it was a conceited move on your part, Seagull.
