So you want to add universal down grav, readjusted hitstun, increased running speeds and all that? Well that's great for fun stuff, but if your goal is to get it incorporated into the plussery set then why aren't you debating it? If you feel it has merit, you are a WBR member so you can post your findings and we can talk it out. From reading your stuff it seems that you haven't let this go because you feel it has merit, so why don't you bring the topic back up?
I thought I have debated about it before and no bite. I tried to explain that higher dgrav, increased run speeds will in turn produce a lower needed hitstun which will help out the games flow, pace, and be better for the game but no one wanted it for whatever reason. In fact, there is a lot of things I debated over and felt that my side had better arguments but it was decided not to be incorporated unless it was dumbed down. I am of course talking about no air dodging during tumble and fast fall during tumble. Maybe I will make a thread to discuss this but I doubt that universal gravity will be in seeing how I have had several debates but people don't want it just because. At least, that was the impression I got.
Really now? Your words don't cut it? Maybe there is a reason why they don't. Maybe it's because some of your ideas aren't quite as sound as you think they are. Hell, I JUST showed up, pushed for a reasonable Link buff, and it's going to come to fruition soon. It's not like it's hard to get the WBR to do something if you have good logic and reasoning to back up what you say.
See, the problem is this. I really dissect this game with a fine toothed comb and most of my scrutinizing is deemed "unnecessary" or "things are fine" even with a good argument. Yes things are "fine" but I want better but it seems like I am the only one who thinks this way. This is what I mean by me feeling as though my words are not enough.
Two things to say to this quote. One, Falcon doesn't really need that much in the ways of buffs. He's already a really good character. We haven't buffed him much because of that.
Seeing what I heard about BtL, I'm inclined to disagree.
It really doesn't take me that long to get caught up with stuff.
Then why didn't you know what this thread was about and the point of my set in this thread?
All in all, A LOT of the stuff you have in your set isn't even mentioned in the WBR or on IRC. It seems like you are staying relatively isolated from the rest of the group. If your goal was what you say it is, then why are you not actively discussing the changes you are making with us?
I believe most if not all of whats in my set was at one point in time discussed in the WBR. You most likely were not here to see it.
It seems to me that judging from your actions, your intentions are not to help the Plussery much at all. Do you not realize that it is shady behavior?
I do suggest ideas to help the plussery thread as my primary action. Any ideas rejected is what goes into my set.
dear kupo, we are somewhat having an issue here.
you see, the majority of the WBR and I'm not gonna lie, isn't happy with the way it is currently going with you and this set. let me elaborate a bit on this.
Yes I am quite aware. But then why was this thread even made with me allowed to have my set on post 2? You are unhappy for me to have a set that was "allowed?" It seems to me as though the true intention behind this thread was to pounce on those who actually did what the idea of the thread is supposed to do which really makes no sense to me.
the first thing is that we somewhat feel stolen.you seem to copy-paste a lot of values without actually looking into them or testing them. best example would be your reply to someone who asked why you mabe ike's Dair a spike. you said: "I didn't know, I didn't touch it." somewhat strange don't you think?
Yea. This should indicate that a lot of things at the base level I support of what the plussery is doing but there is more I think could be done with the set in which I have debated without luck.
this is not true. if you actually wanted something go into the official set, come to the IRC for once and talk about things, like even non-WBR members do.
I wasn't aware until recently how much discussion goes on in there over the broom which is the place I solely look for furthering development.
instead you put thing you want into your own set.
I only put things in my set once they are rejected by the broom.
the official set is not based around what all the members in the WBR want, it is based on what the project needs.
From the looks of it, it is based on what the majority
wants over the project's needs. I felt that the Pro NADT did a great job with showing you why its needed but the "wants" of the majority is why it wasn't put in. The same thing goes with universal dgrav. I think I showed why universal is better and you have been experiencing the problems first hand with CGs on falcon in which the proposed solution is to make a new code or do some workaround to fix it leaving the core problem unaddressed based on wants?
This is actually my biggest issue with the project as it stands. I feel like I am arguing against personal "wants" instead of project "needs" which is why I am less inclined to debate when I have a good idea of what the outcome will be. That is how I'm seeing things
now the best way to go, we think is to get you set closer to the current official set, so we can actually work out how something would fit into both sets.
The main differences that my set focuses on are the pace of play and movement and also game mechanics that the plussery leaves out. Those are the most important things I want the plussery to include because as you can see, our frame and hitbox changes aren't too different from one another.
if we can't agree on how we go with your set we have a problem. you see, you are currently the only person that is allowed to have a set outside the official one,
So I am allowed this set to be public as is but people are upset with the fact I took up the offer? Wasn't Alopex also supposed to have one below me?
and if you claim that we should keep them exchanging ideas, but in the meantime you acually seem isolated (mookie quote) I honestly don't see why you have more right for a set than I do.
IIRC, the whole purpose of this thread was to exchange ideas and I may be isolated because it appears that no one is willing to even look this way. So what am I supposed to do? On the surface, my set's values seems to be quite radical but once adjusted, there really isn't anything bad. It has a nice flow and pace. Why wouldn't you want this?
BTW if you haven't noticed mookie, I'm not the same kupo you left 3 (?) months ago. I've picked up the ideals or similar direction you have fought for preplussery and was a fool not to see this way back when.