You add absolutely nothing to the conversation. Stop posting.i do this because im leaving now, and its pointless to respond to this, so dont waste your time.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
You add absolutely nothing to the conversation. Stop posting.i do this because im leaving now, and its pointless to respond to this, so dont waste your time.
this post is full of win.You add absolutely nothing to the conversation. Stop posting.
Thank you.You add absolutely nothing to the conversation. Stop posting.
Pffft; even Tinker is more broken than that thing*yugioh card*
not as broken as yawgmoth's but holy **** it would definitely boost dragon decks.
That depends on the context.Pffft; even Tinker is more broken than that thing
@ Ulevo: I would just rather have this thread be closed instead.
How so? How is "Top" a misspelling of "High"? It's a mistyping, if anything. It's still only a minor thing. The major thing here is that he believed that Peach had gone to either the Top of Mid or the Bottom of High when she's barely in Lower Mid.and this is you making assuptions about what people means when theyve told you otherwise.
I'm wrong on occasion... about minor facts and minor things. My bigger arguments and main arguments are oftentimes not "wrong", possibly "flawed", but almost never proven wrong.you say that but you frequently dont put your words into action, and when you do its in such a back handed way that nobody really believes that you think you were wrong to begin with.
You say you arent infalliible, but you act like you are.
You aren't reading any of my posts before "replying" to them. I have never claimed any of this. I have openly stated that none of this is true and that I do not believe any of these things.Listen here Yuna, and listen well.
This will be, my last post directed to you.
Your word, isn't fact.
You aren't God.
You aren't God.
You.
Aren't.
God.
No, but when I disprove your opinions or facts with facts, then I have refuted your facts. I do not state my opinions to refute other opinions or facts. I use facts to do that.So when you waltz into a thread, and state your opinion, yeah, I said opinion, that does not mean it's fact.
This is a thread to discuss facts. This is something verifiable. Even opinions can be fact-based, but this thread is specifically hear to discuss the facts.Now tell me. Is this a thread to discuss a fact? Or to hear both sides of the OPINION?
Not really, opinions are welcome, but this thread is about facts.But when the question is open for both sides to debate? It's called an opinion on either side.
There is a right or wrong when it comes to the subject of this thread. It's just gonna take a lot of time to compare the two games enough to prove the other side wrong beyond a shadow of a doubt. I'm proving the other side wrong step by step, successively getting there.There is no right or wrong, people will go both ways in every debate you come across.
Because I disprove your words? Like how we didn't know Olimar and Falco have evenish match-ups against MK 'til just recently (when we've known that for months)?To me, your words are now meaningless.
No, I'm quite human. I'm wrong all the time. Why are you ignoring me saying this?Because you think you're something other than human, it seems.
I have never implied you weren't intelligent/are unintelligent. I have never argued your level of intelligence. I just proved you wrong on very specific things.I'll know that regardless of what goes down here in the pixelated world we call Smash World Forums, I'm still an intelligent person, no matter how much you may want to contradict that.
I have also never argued your opinions are wrong. I've argued they might be misguided because they might be based on flawed facts. The only things of yours I've argued were wrong are your facts.I know that my opinions are still valid, no matter how many times you want to reject that.
You're a prominent debater? Then how come I barely see you around? Do you mean in other parts of SWF? If you are a prominent debater in others parts of SWF, then I'll conceede to that.I know that I'm a prominent debater, no matter how many times you choose not to accept that.
What does this have to do with this debate? When did we ever argue people's skill in Brawl? In fact, I've argued one's skill to be entirely irrelevant when it comes to one's credibility as a debater of Smash matters.And Finally, I know that one day, I'll reach brawl's Peak, and become the best in the US (Cue Anime music... Now.) Because I've got tact, wit, and skill, no matter how many times, you might forget that. (Continue Anime music for about thirty more seconds, and Scene.)
Me too.Pffft; even Tinker is more broken than that thing
@ Ulevo: I would just rather have this thread be closed instead.
I liked it more when it was unbalanced, after affinity cycled out of standard it got less fun for me.Historically, MTG has been a poorly balanced game. It has gotten a lot better though over the past couple of years.
Bup-bup!I'm just trying to emphasize the fact that we shouldn't be clustering our boards with threads dedicated to opinion based, chaotic, non productive, [insert more reasons for Yuna to argue here] topics.
Funnily enough, this subject was abandoned for months 'til a certain someone sniffed up a few "new facts" and thought it was enough to open a new thread because these new facts apparently presented something new and until then unheard of which would revolutionize the subject matter.This whole discussion is completely arbitrary, opinion based, and serves to come to no conclusion or end. It is simply for the sake of conversation, the sharing of opinions, and debating (which unfortunately leads to useless dreck and name slandering/credibility contest).
I think that logically, that's best.Lets fight to the death and whoever is alive at the end decides which is more balanced.
Where've you been for the last 98 or so pages?Lets fight to the death and whoever is alive at the end decides which is more balanced.
I love that game.Ask yourself this instead: Why does Kisame in GNT4 have a combo which will drain 75%+ of your lifebar + put at you at 50% chakra at best and it works unless you get 75% chakra from BB while Itachi has a 0-death combo which will leave you with 0% chakra?
Answer: ****ty game design.
GTN4 Isn't Sh*tty.I love that game.
It -is- ****ty game design, though.
Im preparing to fight to the death.I love how unintelligible the masses are.
Where've you been for the last 98 or so pages?
You do not need to be the world's best Smasher in order to debate Smash. All you need is a deep grasp of Smash's finer aspects. I have proven time and time again that I possess this.Yuna you do act like a stuck up know it all.Do you have any credentials for being suck a ****(tournament results)
Let's play "Guess the chraracter!"I love that game.
It -is- ****ty game design, though.
Pay attention. ****ty design. The game itself is quite good, the design, not so good. Read entire posts before replying to them.GTN4 Isn't Sh*tty.
Yes, and? Once he hits you with it, you'll die and end up with 0% chakra.Itachi's 0-Death subsist on you hitting his special.
Just don't do it Imo. =/
You've won tournaments as Lee facing bad and/or stupid Itachi-players. Itach is one of Lee's worst match-ups.I've won tournaments with Lee, facing stupid Itachi's. It still works.
Yuna... exactly what is the point in liberating the "truth" from the "lies" in a cest pool of a discussion? It's like you're trying to be a logical hero in the world of stupid, when the best solution is to either lock the thread (hello fellow moderators) or to leave the fire alone by not feeding it. I'm perfectly aware you didn't revive the thread (as you've pointed out already), but going along with the argument at hand doesn't make your hands any cleaner than those you are pointing the finger at, or anyone else in this thread who continues to blabber on about supposed "facts" or their "opinion".Bup-bup!
This subject-matter can be entirely fact based. A lot of people just make sweeping judgements and use their opinions and interpretations alone when arguing the subject matter.
Funnily enough, this subject was abandoned for months 'til a certain someone sniffed up a few "new facts" and thought it was enough to open a new thread because these new facts apparently presented something new and until then unheard of which would revolutionize the subject matter.
I've left this thread alone for days upon end. Sometimes even a week or so. It just goes on and on and on because people feel a need to just add their "2 cents" without reading anything that came before it. But if no one's around to correct the lies/mistakes/flawed arguments, less knowledgeable people will think it's the truth and spread it further, thus contaminating the boards further.
So at least with someone here to counter-argue (and this goes for both sides of all debates), it will not be a one-sided blabbering of "facts" which might be entirely made up or wrong.
Because, as I've already stated it, with or without me, this thread rages on. Now if it gets locked, yay. But since it hasn't yet been locked, with or without me or anyone arguing "my" side, the thread will continue. And if no one's here to clear up the facts, flawed facts will keep being circulated.Yuna... exactly what is the point in liberating the "truth" from the "lies" in a cest pool of a discussion? It's like you're trying to be a logical hero in the world of stupid, when the best solution is to either lock the thread (hello fellow moderators) or to leave the fire alone by not feeding it. I'm perfectly aware you didn't revive the thread (as you've pointed out already), but going along with the argument at hand doesn't make your hands any cleaner than those you are pointing the finger at, or anyone else in this thread who continues to blabber on about supposed "facts" or their "opinion".
This thread will and already has lived on and prospered without me for prolonged periods of time. If it's not locked, it will keep on being posted in. That's the harsh reality.Well Yuna, they say the only cure for stupidity is death. I don't see this case as an exception.
If you feel the need to take on the noble task of clearing up "facts" in this thread with your "facts", then go on ahead. I personally think it just prolongs the life expectancy this thread has, especially with how rigorously you argue with members.
You mean underrated? He is a terrible character....at high levels of play. He has so many disadvantage and simple things like using Fox's uptilt destroys almost all of his options.Pichu is so friekin overrated. His f-smash ***** spotdodges and KO's very quickly. His aerial mobility is on par with Captain Falcon. His recovery is excellent, and his edgeguarding is good as well. His projectle's slowness is a benefit since it allows him to approach without fear of retribution. Pichu is pretty much the fastest character below mid tier. What's the drawback? Light? sounds familiar...
The lack of range can be avoided with his Falcon-like aerial mobility.
You mean underrated? He is a terrible character....at high levels of play. He has so many disadvantage and simple things like using Fox's uptilt destroys almost all of his options.
Doesn't mean he isn't an awesome character.....cause he is.
YOU ARE SO LUCKY Yuna isnt here here i'll give you some advice and two quotes by him.vote: yes brawl is more balanced than melee.
thats why scars thread went nowhere. claims without facts and justification (and a whole buch of thread spamming) This is a debate thats looking incredibly one sided right now because i will say to the people on the brawl side flatout. put up or shut up. Most of them have shut up cause they thought this was gonna be easy to just say I think brawl is more balanced. This approach is WRONG
I've left this thread alone for days upon end. Sometimes even a week or so. It just goes on and on and on because people feel a need to just add their "2 cents" without reading anything that came before it. But if no one's around to correct the lies/mistakes/flawed arguments, less knowledgeable people will think it's the truth and spread it further, thus contaminating the boards further.
So actually contribute next time. kThis subject-matter can be entirely fact based. A lot of people just make sweeping judgements and use their opinions and interpretations alone when arguing the subject matter.
What good is a "contribution" that adds nothing to the thread or was debunked 15 pages ago.lol I did the same thing. if you expect us to read 100 pages of comments before contributing what the purpose of the thread is, you're sadly mistaken.