Composeur
Smash Ace
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2007
- Messages
- 518
Haha, that means you see druggedfox's point, at least...?Peach isn't good LOL.
The existence of a player like Armada makes Peach a much more confusing character to analyze. The kid's obviously a genius at seeing behavioral patterns and exploiting them, and Peach happens to be his vehicle. Basically he has to win sets against the top-level competition by outsmarting them, rather than outplaying them (technically), if we're to take Armada at his own word.
The thing is, if we eliminate this one single Peach player from our analyses of tournament results from the last 2 years, both NTSC and PAL, the Fox-Peach match-up ratio being 70/30 becomes quite believable. This would make him the only single player (that I can think of) to have a substantial impact on a high-tier character's success ratio. If you eliminate mango or m2k or jman or even hbox from tournament results, you can still find whatever character they played well-represented elsewhere. But Armada's an anomaly. vanz and macD are great players, but I think we all expect that they wouldn't typically place above m2k and jman in a given tournament.
What's my point here? I don't really know, except that 70/30 only seems laughable because of a single player. So either Armada is really that much of a prodigy, or NO other Peach players play at the same level as those top-tier players. I guess the truth is likely to be somewhere in the middle, as usual. Thoughts?
edit: clarified points