Mr.E
Smash Lord
One thing I will say is that I don't agree with FD being taken off the starter list. I do agree that it's really not all that neutral but the entire point of stage striking is to alleviate such an issue. Battlefield isn't exactly "neutral" either in something like a G&W/D3 match-up and as ROB it's basically my default first strike against most of the cast. I don't see how forcing me to BF more often is more "fair" than forcing someone like MK toward FD. (As if MK needs more help.) Why can't we have the "BF replacement" stage on starter as well, moving BF to counterpick status? And there's plenty of people that john about Lylat being a neutral stage.
Anyway, to get away from my whining... The most neutral stage is determined by the character match-up. Ideally, we'd just use the entire stage list to strike from but I assume time concerns are why nobody does that. The least we could do is expand the starter list. Taking from THE GOD KAIS !! first event, you could add FD plus one of Halberd / Castle / Delfino / Abyss to the starter list to total nine starters. That still leaves more than half of the stage list as CP-only. There's nothing "radical" or unusual or hazardous about FD, it deserves starter status.
Anyway, to get away from my whining... The most neutral stage is determined by the character match-up. Ideally, we'd just use the entire stage list to strike from but I assume time concerns are why nobody does that. The least we could do is expand the starter list. Taking from THE GOD KAIS !! first event, you could add FD plus one of Halberd / Castle / Delfino / Abyss to the starter list to total nine starters. That still leaves more than half of the stage list as CP-only. There's nothing "radical" or unusual or hazardous about FD, it deserves starter status.