Endless Nightmares
Smash Master
If you want to be decent with Pichu just spam SH nair.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Mass. LOLs.I was letting people at the local pick my characters, so I won with Falcon and lost with Peach and Falco.
obviously meWho's the best pichu player in the world?
umm actually yes it does. That's EXACTLY what it means.samus IS way too high, but again, people are way too biased on tourney results. Tourney results does not necessarily reflect how good the character is
What the hell? So can we really place a character on the tier list based on the placings of 1... maybe 2 players? (HugS for Samus, Chu and Wobbles for ICs for example)umm actually yes it does. That's EXACTLY what it means.
This worries me... Deeply. If that's all what the tier list was based on, then idk. I just don't know.umm actually yes it does. That's EXACTLY what it means.
so are you saying tourney results dont at all show how good a character is. because thats what im getting out of this. how else are people supposed to measure how good a character is other than the best players playing characters at a high skill and seeing how their character does in a tourney against other great players.no it doesnt, tourney results dont show how good a character is, it's based wayyyyyyyyyy too much off individual player skill and popularity and who still plays and who doesnt
convo with m2k from 30 minutes ago:This worries me... Deeply. If that's all what the tier list was based on, then idk. I just don't know.
ummmmmm, exactly?Why would m2k use sheik in the finals when the finals are always against spacies/peach/ics and his marth is better against them?
Just because marth is better against those four characters doesn't mean he's better than shiek.ummmmmm, exactly?
But he has a better chance of WINNING THE TOURNAMENT than sheik does.Just because marth is better against those four characters doesn't mean he's better than shiek.
thank you. people don't seem to be getting this. lets repeat over and over until they doBut he has a better chance of WINNING THE TOURNAMENT than sheik does.
if those 4 characters are the ones commonly used, it makes marth better than sheik for a tournament setting.Just because marth is better against those four characters doesn't mean he's better than shiek.
well if you think tiers should be based only on tournament results then you're not going to agree with me anyway. I thought they were supposed to reflect actual quality of character.But he has a better chance of WINNING THE TOURNAMENT than sheik does.
raaaaaaaaaape[23:20] MycatgoesMow: so do it in tournament
[23:20] Jason: theres no reason to when i can have better chances CGing with marth
[23:20] Jason: like, why should i risk money
[23:20] Jason: just to prove tiers
[23:20] Jason: money > tiers
[23:21] MycatgoesMow: so when it comes time to win money, you choose marth, which means you have a higher chance to win with him, aka he's a better character for winning tournaments, aka higher on the tier list
[23:21] MycatgoesMow: thank you, now we're on the same page
[23:21] MycatgoesMow: I've been saying this for years
[23:21] MycatgoesMow: reasons don't matter
[23:22] MycatgoesMow: when people want to win and use better chars, thats how we define tiers