Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Haha, holy ****. Dat omgus.Circus for his lack of action after calling me out for White-Knighting Ryker and I question Gorf/J. Both give me slightly scummy vibes but nothing I'd lynch for. You, Inaro, Choice, and Red Ruy strike me as good policy lynches.
You may actually have a point with this post WL...Who would you consider more fruitful to pressure, a V/LA Gorf or J?
You know, that would make a lot of sense. Weird that you had to tell me that and not J, though.@Circus: When Axel said "This side's" I don't think he means town, I think he means one side of the hydra, or one head.
I disagree with this. Just look at hist post voting WL. He parroted your reasoning for voting him.You know, that would make a lot of sense. Weird that you had to tell me that and not J, though.
Oh, and EE, I've seen your stuff on J, and there have certainly been points about J that bug me, but more than anything, I'm seeing him as a scapegoat right now.
Can you read? Before Circus even posted I was expressing disdain for WL. In fact just look at the two posts ABOVE Circus'. I said I agreed with Circus and that wasn't the reason I was solely voting him.I disagree with this. Just look at hist post voting WL. He parroted your reasoning for voting him.
Not V/LA. Just posting somewhat sporadically due to replacing into a BRoom game, life, and laziness.Circus are you on V/LA or anything? I Like what I've seen from you so far and want more
If you think J is a scapegoat then what do you think of EE who started the attack on him?
While your at it do you think there's a Washed/Choice connection or are you just saying they're both scummy? If you see a connection the bring it up please
Wow.Looking back, I was wrong when I said it doesn't imply meta. I think I was trying too hard not to contradict myself and ****ed up as a result. There is some meta involved, but it's not the point of the case. It just strengthens it.
I agree, though, the case has been kinda weak and I've been strongly considering switching to J's wagon but I'm not done with Ryker yet and we've still got a little bit of time.
Wowlolwtfisthis.This is honestly making me aggravated by the way you are pushing this.
Okay, let me explain and use my words to clearly and explictly to tell you. EE's case to me, is garbage because I know he is wrong. I think he is reaching and a lil tunnely for the reasons I already pointed out. The reason I find him town is for a couple reasons. His wording on how he is handling the attack. The sheer amount of effort put into that post (yes, I know it comes hypocriticial from me since people say to disregard that point when dealin with me) but i still don't get why on D1 someone would put so much effort into it. Then there is this key point, he is actually convincing me that I am wrong on what I said and what he does say does have some stock to it where I cannot honestly talk myself out of. He is bringing up legitamate points that, I don't know how to put it into words.
The major point I guess I want to bring from this post is, I think he is town that some of his points are true and that I actually agree to why he finds them scummy and I do get where he is coming from. The attitude also taken towards calling me scum plays a part in it as well.
IDC about EE meta right now and Gord that's your opinion. *sigh*Wowlolwtfisthis.
1) Wording of how he handled the attack
Cool story bro, just so happens that EE has played town games, and can find a way to trick somebody into thinking his word play is that of town. Wording isn't a tell either way da hell?
Ew, why post this? Your poisoning the water with a statement like that./inb4"lolugrimy"
*sigh* I'm sorry you think it's a BS reason. I guess I'm also sorry for it influencing my read on EE but it just is for me.Are you seriously equating effort with townieness?
Meta's so convenient for you.J said:IDC about EE meta right now and Gord that's your opinion. *sigh*
How do you feel about Adolf Hitler's efforts to make a perfect society? I mean, he did a terrible thing, but at least he worked. Right?J said:Did you seriously ask that first question? Work is work Gord. Whether the work may not turn up to be a product I like doesn't take away the fact of effort that went into it.
Meta's SO convenient for you.J said:Quit bringing meta into this and how does D1 have anything to do with him convincing me that I'm wrong.
Cute.J said:No, it's not illogicial. Man can you even breathe, let alone think correctly without being so dag on scummy?
J said:Ew, why post this? Your poisoning the water with a statement like that.
What does this even mean?I can't believe I have to compose this post for a third time.
Meta's so convenient for you.
Way to take an extremist PoV in the most negative connotation as to what I was getting at.Gord said:How do you feel about Adolf Hitler's efforts to make a perfect society? I mean, he did a terrible thing, but at least he worked. Right?
Again with the same line. WtfamIreading.jpg at the D1 reads are only made on speculation. And experience does not matter to me because it means jack ****.Gord said:Meta's SO convenient for you.
It's a D1 read. D1 reads are made entirely upon speculation. Therefore, they are almost never truly concrete. Now, knowing that (META ALERT, META ALERT), do you think that it'd be easier for an experienced player to prove your read, let alone your D1 read, wrong, or a less experienced player?
You use meta to fuel so much. Ex. most of your reads on people, including most of your flawed reads on Kuz in most games you guys are in together. Yet, you refuse to use it when it's for a legitimate case.J said:What does this even mean?
It's the same shiz.J said:Way to take an extremist PoV in the most negative connotation as to what I was getting at.
WtfamIreading.jpg at the thought of D1 reads NOT being speculation. The fact that it's the beginning of the game, you have nothing to truly go back on, and therefore, you gotta rely on nothing but your personal intuition. Which, my friend, is what I mean by speculation. And obtw you didn't answer the question. Which is harder: an experienced player dissuading, or a less experienced player?J said:Again with the same line. WtfamIreading.jpg at the D1 reads are only made on speculation. And experience does not matter to me because it means jack ****.
Bull**** complete and utter bull****You use meta to fuel so much. Ex. most of your reads on people, including most of your flawed reads on Kuz in most games you guys are in together. Yet, you refuse to use it when it's for a legitimate case.
Once again, bull**** that D1 is all speculation. You are saying D1 is all about gut and intuition and not about what is actually scummy during D1 and what someone is doing?Gord said:WtfamIreading.jpg at the thought of D1 reads NOT being speculation. The fact that it's the beginning of the game, you have nothing to truly go back on, and therefore, you gotta rely on nothing but your personal intuition. Which, my friend, is what I mean by speculation. And obtw you didn't answer the question. Which is harder: an experienced player dissuading, or a less experienced player?
I just saw this in more detail and seriously laughed my *** off.
I reread; I realized I made a mistake. Is this a scumtell?@WL: You flipped like a switch.
I'm pretty sure I mentioned that I was suspicious of you prior to it. EE's case wasn't the fire starter as much as it was the extra firewood.WL, you are slightly buddying EE in your 1165 and you strawman my defense to the smallest degrees you can. You also keep repeating that EE's case is the main decider as to why your read has changed. 4 times you say so.
Fair enough? I ****ed up.Haha, holy ****. Dat omgus.
Unvote
Vote: WashedLaundry
Your reasoning for everything you say is terrible. Your case on Ryker is weak. You're just now realizing that it's based completely on meta (though you still aren't totally owning up to it)? You've been spitting fire about how it's NOT BASED ON META and you would NEVER BE STUPID ENOUGH TO DO THAT WITH RYKER DERP, but that's exactly what you're doing. You twisted yourself into a pretzel to make your case on Ryker work and it just ****ing doesn't. People noticed, so now you're backpedaling.
Up until this post, you hadn't really "attacked" me in that sense, just kinda sat in the distance and shot at the pot without ever committing to it, despite the fact that you were the first to point it out. Normal people call that suspicious.You have no other scum reads other than me (your attacker)
No? Choice, Ran, Red Ruy are all just as easy, if not easier.and J and Gordo, who are probably the easiest people you could possibly choose to deflect to.
No? I'm pretty sure I mentioned my suspicions/distaste of him earlier in the phase.So now you're trying to add coal to the J engine. You have no sincere cases on anyone. What the hell, lynch this scum.
Bull****.Can you read? Before Circus even posted I was expressing disdain for WL. In fact just look at the two posts ABOVE Circus'. I said I agreed with Circus and that wasn't the reason I was solely voting him.
Yes. I realized that I ****ed up. I realized I made a ****ty case. I realized I was wrong when I went back and reread Ryker's posts. It was a weak-as-hell case, even I admit to that./possibly only post of the day.
So I've been catching up and noticing some arguments against WL. I kinda caught myself wiping off saying "Meh, WL town they dumb". But, I looked back, and noticed holes. And then, this.
Wow.
What the f*** is this?
You've completely contradicted your case against Ryker. And now that people are starting to accuse your case of holding no ground, you back out on it and say that you'd switch to J's wagon (which is a serious cop out)?
Unvote
Vote: Washed Laundry
Weak as holy hell.
And now, after seeing Circus' case against you, I totally digress from my Ryker > WL argument. No, I still don't believe them to be of the same alignment. But WL scum is looking much more prevelant.
You're contradicting yourself. If a case is reaching, how is it also partially right? If you get where he's coming from, chances are, it's your action. Does not make sense.This is honestly making me aggravated by the way you are pushing this.
Okay, let me explain and use my words to clearly and explictly to tell you. EE's case to me, is garbage because I know he is wrong. I think he is reaching and a lil tunnely for the reasons I already pointed out. The reason I find him town is for a couple reasons. His wording on how he is handling the attack. The sheer amount of effort put into that post (yes, I know it comes hypocriticial from me since people say to disregard that point when dealin with me) but i still don't get why on D1 someone would put so much effort into it. Then there is this key point, he is actually convincing me that I am wrong on what I said and what he does say does have some stock to it where I cannot honestly talk myself out of. He is bringing up legitamate points that, I don't know how to put it into words.
The major point I guess I want to bring from this post is, I think he is town that some of his points are true and that I actually agree to why he finds them scummy and I do get where he is coming from. The attitude also taken towards calling me scum plays a part in it as well.
Translation: Becuase I believe this, every vote I have thrown out this phase is weak and illogical.WtfamIreading.jpg at the thought of D1 reads NOT being speculation. The fact that it's the beginning of the game, you have nothing to truly go back on, and therefore, you gotta rely on nothing but your personal intuition. Which, my friend, is what I mean by speculation. And obtw you didn't answer the question. Which is harder: an experienced player dissuading, or a less experienced player?