• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Should Metaknight be Banned? ***Take 3***

Should Metaknight be banned?


  • Total voters
    2,309
Status
Not open for further replies.

CR4SH

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
1,814
Location
Louisville Ky.
The "Guys, the top players just Happen to main MK, and therefore skew tourny results" argument just HAS to go.

It's false, it's dumb. Get a new argument.
 

Steel

Where's my Jameson?
BRoomer
Joined
Mar 30, 2008
Messages
7,587
Location
Los Angeles, CA
The "Guys, the top players just Happen to main MK, and therefore skew tourny results" argument just HAS to go.

It's false, it's dumb. Get a new argument.
Especially since MK MAKES the top players. (Not all of them, but definitely worth noting)
 

Nidtendofreak

Smash Hero
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
7,265
Location
Belleville, Ontario
NNID
TheNiddo
3DS FC
3668-7651-8940
Making an appeal to popular opinion will not bolster your argument. Just because more people vote for MK to be banned does not mean he needs to be banned.

The fact that most of the top players use a top character is not a flaw. That's simply common sense. They want to give themselves the best chances at winning. This game isn't all Metaknight, and you do see other characters besides MK winning at larger tournaments.
1) Not much of a bolster, agreed, but still is one. Particularly when some of the changed opinions are from people like Snakee, who stated in another topic he was now Pro-ban. That, and seeing as we ALL play the game, their opinions still do factor in. It's not the end all deciding factor, but still weighs in.

2) Yes it is a flaw: when most of the top players use ONE top character, particularly at the huge tournaments with big pay outs, like at WHOBO.

In Brawl, big tournaments results most of the time look like this:

MK
MK
MK/Secondary
Main/MK
Main
Main/MK
MK
MK/Secondary

Give or take a few MKs. Melee was closer to something like this:

Fox
Fox/Marth
Falco
Sheik
Falco
Marth
Fox
Sheik/Falco

There was at least 4 characters you could win a big tournament with. In Brawl, you MUST use MK to win the big tournaments, or at least thats what it seems like. Everyone and their mother uses MK, instead of everyone and their mother using the top 4 or 5 characters. And thats a problem.
 

Brinzy

Godfather of the Crimean Mafia
Joined
May 29, 2008
Messages
3,672
Location
Alexandria, VA
NNID
Brinzy
Banning MK will open metagames for many characters, and make many of them Viable.

Allowing everybody to prosper.
There are not that many characters whose worst match-up is MK. On the other hand, there are more characters whose worst match-ups are Marth, G&W, Falco, etc. Removing MK means you'd get more of these characters in the tournament scene, and the case for many characters goes from bad to worse.

As for those who have MK as their worst fight, sure, banning MK would help them out in order to win tournaments, but would it really advance the metagame? If their worst fight is MK, then they need to be working on their worst fight, not so much the second worst.

I think the only ones who could potentially prosper are those who suffer directly from MK.
 

BOB SAGET!

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 26, 2009
Messages
1,125
Location
CANADA
Meta pisses too many people off. You just say his name and you are ticked. this messes up the mindset to deal or beat meta. This to me is one of the biggiest problems when dealing with meta. And learning how to kick his azz
there is a 40/60 chance that MK will get overthrown because its too early to tell if a character is too good. MK is not good enough to be banned, nintendo isnt that stupid to make a character far better than the rest.
 

CR4SH

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
1,814
Location
Louisville Ky.
Especially since MK MAKES the top players. (Not all of them, but definitely worth noting)
I disagree with that statement entirely. Here's how it goes, from my experience.

Players main the character they like, or the character that suits their playstyle best. They either get good (quickly or slowly) enough to have a reasonable chance to win a tournament, or to win tournaments fairly consistantly. At this point they make the decision that maining MK would win them more tournaments, so they do it. They do it because it is clearly and without question their best chance to win. That's ****ed up.
 

Eddie G

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 24, 2006
Messages
9,123
Location
Cleveland, OH
NNID
neohmarth216
Do you really thing he is just winning because he is pissing people off? I think he is pissing people off because he IS winning
Is misinterpretation really that common around here?

He is clearly implying the frustration that can possibly stem from and by fighting a MK. The character has all the tools necessary to frustrate some players, thus hindering their ability to effectively deal with the matchup if they succumb to that frustration.

Honestly...:ohwell:
 

Dark.Pch

Smash Legend
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
16,918
Location
Manhattan, New York
NNID
Dark.Pch
3DS FC
5413-0118-3799
i dont want to start a fight i just want to say the truth. most people wont bother reading all dat because they have better things to do. anyway if u watch tournament battles on youtube. you will see how when MK fights, the battle is usually pretty close.
People did and most aggreed with what I said. wether in here or where i really posted all that in. So just cause you don't wanna read it, does not mean others are. and you saying that causes a fight. Think.

And pretty close against who?
What players are behind behind meta?
who is meta playing, High tiers or mid and below?
How high is the level of play here?

You can't just say this and be like" well this dude got close to kicking this dudes azz, thats more than enough reason to keep him in." It does not work that way. He is a problem to a point a thread like this has to be made on him. if it was that simple, this thread not need to be made.


 

ShadowLink84

Smash Hero
Joined
Sep 12, 2005
Messages
9,007
Location
Middle of nowhere. Myrtle Beach
What scrubby MK players beat top level players?
No one remembers when inui's 2 week old MK beat Bum's DK? =\

there is a 40/60 chance that MK will get overthrown because its too early to tell if a character is too good. MK is not good enough to be banned, nintendo isnt that stupid to make a character far better than the rest.
???

nintendo isnt that stupid
nintendo isnt stupid
/wrist
 

spudzalot

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
299
Location
Utah
I voted Yes.

We only have one real MK in my scene and I have only faced him once so its not like he is a huge problem FOR ME. But from some of the videos I have seen and all of the tourney results (especially WHOBO) I just think the game would be better off without Meta.
 

Steel

Where's my Jameson?
BRoomer
Joined
Mar 30, 2008
Messages
7,587
Location
Los Angeles, CA
I disagree with that statement entirely. Here's how it goes, from my experience.

Players main the character they like, or the character that suits their playstyle best. They either get good (quickly or slowly) enough to have a reasonable chance to win a tournament, or to win tournaments fairly consistantly. At this point they make the decision that maining MK would win them more tournaments, so they do it. They do it because it is clearly and without question their best chance to win. That's ****ed up.
How does that go against what I said?

Player mains Lucario
Player gets frustrated, switches to MK
Player is now a top contender at tournaments

This doesn't happen to all players, but I've seen it happen a lot.
 

Ru-fi-o

Banned via Administration
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
114
Location
Off the top of FD

BentoBox

Smash Master
Joined
Aug 11, 2005
Messages
3,214
Location
Montreal
there is a 40/60 chance that MK will get overthrown because its too early to tell if a character is too good. MK is not good enough to be banned, nintendo isnt that stupid to make a character far better than the rest.
LoL, /thread.

Nintendo doesn't care about the competitive community.


I disagree with that statement entirely. Here's how it goes, from my experience.

Players main the character they like, or the character that suits their playstyle best. They either get good (quickly or slowly) enough to have a reasonable chance to win a tournament, or to win tournaments fairly consistantly. At this point they make the decision that maining MK would win them more tournaments, so they do it. They do it because it is clearly and without question their best chance to win. That's ****ed up.
He was agreeing with you...
 

Master Raven

Smash Master
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
3,491
Location
SFL
No one remembers when inui's 2 week old MK beat Bum's DK? =\
I thought Inui stated somewhere that he used him for roughly a month (4 weeks), not to mention Bum has continuously beaten his MK afterward (correct me if Inui has gained another victory against him with MK since then).
 

Overswarm

is laughing at you
Joined
May 4, 2005
Messages
21,181
If anyone has lyrics for a banning MK song, let me know. It can be rap or singing, I'll get y.b.m. to back me up
 

CR4SH

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
1,814
Location
Louisville Ky.
How does that go against what I said?

Player mains Lucario
Player gets frustrated, switches to MK
Player is now a top contender at tournaments

This doesn't happen to all players, but I've seen it happen a lot.
I've never personally seen a player dominate with MK that couldn't win most of those tournaments with lucario. It's not going to make you a whole lot better, it's just going to iron out the rough spots, get rid of the fluke losses etc. In other words, you win all the matches you're supposed to win when you play MK.

Oh not to mention a few you probably shouldn't.
 

BOB SAGET!

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 26, 2009
Messages
1,125
Location
CANADA
People did and most aggreed with what I said. wether in here or where i really posted all that in. So just cause you don't wanna read it, does not mean others are. and you saying that causes a fight. Think.

And pretty close against who?
What players are behind behind meta?
who is meta playing, High tiers or mid and below?
How high is the level of play here?

You can't just say this and be like" well this dude got close to kicking this dudes azz, thats more than enough reason to keep him in." It does not work that way. He is a problem to a point a thread like this has to be made on him. if it was that simple, this thread not need to be made.



example: heres MK getting his *** kicked at a wifi BRoom tournament. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9S5QoCi_NOI

example: MK losing to a diddy kong at Loser's Finals from Smash Riot I in State College, PA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j74xd47ld2E&feature=related
 

SSJ5Goku8932

Smash Lord
Joined
Jan 11, 2009
Messages
1,783
Location
Texas
Personally, I think we should not ban MK because he is the best character in the game currently.

If we ban him, it should be only when all we see at tourneys , are MK dittos :/.
 

ShadowLink84

Smash Hero
Joined
Sep 12, 2005
Messages
9,007
Location
Middle of nowhere. Myrtle Beach
Some nobody calling Inui out. Awesome.
I like this, start it off by calling someone a nobody.
No really, unless you are known, anything you say is not valid.
Please do me a favor and just delete your account if this is ALL you can say.

And NJ is the Hyperbolic time chamber. Two weeks here is your whole life in training.
A 2 week old Metaknight should not be beating a Dk user who has MUCH more experience and skill.

We know for a fact that inui is not some incredible genius at smash, we can tell from his tournament results.

At that point in ime, inui wasn't as good as he is currently and he STILLbeat Bum's Dk.
Keep your bull**** about Nj to yourself. Not in the mood for anymore trolling.
 

Dark.Pch

Smash Legend
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
16,918
Location
Manhattan, New York
NNID
Dark.Pch
3DS FC
5413-0118-3799
there is a 40/60 chance that MK will get overthrown because its too early to tell if a character is too good. MK is not good enough to be banned, nintendo isnt that stupid to make a character far better than the rest.
What Game are YOU talking about here???????

Do you really thing he is just winning because he is pissing people off? I think he is pissing people off because he IS winning
People do get pissed when one picks meta, and it does not have to do with him winning tournies. Meta is the best character in the game correct? Lets say player A players player B. Player A wins round one. Then player B decides to go meta. Player A loses. Game three wether player A decides to stay the same character or switch and choose a good stage (seriously, where the hell you gonna take him) Player A still loses. But why would Player a Be pisses?

- He found out Player B does not uses meta.
- Meta is usually the answer to everything and it is annoying.
- The player may not be all that good Player A is better But meta gets away with too much crap.
- Seeing how everyone just goes meta when things get ruff is annoying.

In my other post I added reason why he annoyes people. it affects thier mindset. they are not on point with a clear head. some sort or rage or w/e had been planted in your head before the match. And as the match goes on, that seed begins to grow.
 

CR4SH

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
1,814
Location
Louisville Ky.
there is a 40/60 chance that MK will get overthrown because its too early to tell if a character is too good.

MK is not good enough to be banned, nintendo isnt that stupid to make a character far better than the rest.
1. You're incredibly wrong. MK is on top, solidly. This game isn't going to go so far forward that MK is going to get overtaken, it's been out too long at this point.

2. Umm, definetly smart enough to break their fav. character on purpose.
 

Ru-fi-o

Banned via Administration
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
114
Location
Off the top of FD
I like this, start it off by calling someone a nobody.
No really, unless you are known, anything you say is not valid.
Please do me a favor and just delete your account if this is ALL you can say.
.
I do not want Green Eggs and Ham
I will not eat them, nobody.

That wasn't a poignant as I wanted it to be.
 

Dark.Pch

Smash Legend
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
16,918
Location
Manhattan, New York
NNID
Dark.Pch
3DS FC
5413-0118-3799

Anther

Smash Champion
Joined
Oct 5, 2005
Messages
2,386
Location
Ann Arbor, MI
Just ban him, jeez, omfg. Sooo much whinery, aren't you people hosting these tournaments x_X? Who's going to cry if he's banned if so many of you want it? It's your game, do what you want with it. Ridiculous T.T, most tourneys are local, so ban him locally and make happy.
 

BOB SAGET!

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 26, 2009
Messages
1,125
Location
CANADA
1. You're incredibly wrong. MK is on top, solidly. This game isn't going to go so far forward that MK is going to get overtaken, it's been out too long at this point.

2. Umm, definetly smart enough to break their fav. character on purpose.
out too long! only 2 tier lists came out so far!
 

Eddie G

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 24, 2006
Messages
9,123
Location
Cleveland, OH
NNID
neohmarth216
There are not that many characters whose worst match-up is MK. On the other hand, there are more characters whose worst match-ups are Marth, G&W, Falco, etc. Removing MK means you'd get more of these characters in the tournament scene, and the case for many characters goes from bad to worse.

As for those who have MK as their worst fight, sure, banning MK would help them out in order to win tournaments, but would it really advance the metagame? If their worst fight is MK, then they need to be working on their worst fight, not so much the second worst.

I think the only ones who could potentially prosper are those who suffer directly from MK.
You put too much faith into matchup numbers my friend.

Matchup difficulty is subjective in most cases at high level play and not a lot of people pay enough respect to this. Leepuff claims the GnW/MK matchup to be 50/50, but not every GnW player (top or not) says the same thing; The same applies to Atomsk's claim on the DDD/MK matchup being 50/50. This is nothing more than their own personal comfort with the matchup, which proves that matchup numbers are ultimately irrelevant unless it is visually clear that one character is totally outclassed by another, which in the case of MK vs. the majority of the cast is valid. Why is it that a lot of the best players (Ally, M2K, etc.) don't sit in these threads and cherry-pick others' arguments while preaching matchup numbers as much as a lot of players on the lower end of the spectrum do, if at all?

Can you recall when you last saw Azen, a player with extensive personal knowledge on several characters, pay a visit to a thread like this to discuss such a subjective topic like anything regarding matchup numbers? Exactly, he doesn't, and yet he is still one of the handful of players at the top who are dealing with the matchups. He and other players who "walk the walk" learn the ins-and-outs of matchups. They aren't stuck playing these silly little number games with a side of theorycrafting.
 

Synth

Smash Cadet
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
43
Location
Eastlake, Ohio
Just ban him, jeez, omfg. Sooo much whinery, aren't you people hosting these tournaments x_X? Who's going to cry if he's banned if so many of you want it? It's your game, do what you want with it. Ridiculous T.T, most tourneys are local, so ban him locally and make happy.


^This. Ban him at local tourneys and see what happens from there. However, all the drama over this IS pretty amusing.
 

Bonehimer

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Apr 23, 2008
Messages
412
Location
Texas
If anyone has lyrics for a banning MK song, let me know. It can be rap or singing, I'll get y.b.m. to back me up
edit the lyrics for The Times They Are A Changing I will even make a video for it and everything.

Quick edit for the lyrics
Come gather 'round smashers
Wherever you roam
And admit that the metagame
Around has stagnated
And accept it that soon
You'll be maining MK.
If your time to you
Is worth savin'
Then you better start voting
Or you'll sink like a low tier
For the times they are a-changin'.

Come backroomers and To's
Who prophesize with your posts
And keep your eyes wide
The chance won't come again
And don't speak too soon
For the wheel's still in spin
And there's no tellin' who
That it's namin'.
For the losers now
Will be later to win
For the times they are a-changin'.


that is all i have, rest of the lyrics
Come senators, congressmen
Please heed the call
Don't stand in the doorway
Don't block up the hall
For he that gets hurt
Will be he who has stalled
There's a battle outside
And it is ragin'.
It'll soon shake your windows
And rattle your walls
For the times they are a-changin'.

Come mothers and fathers
Throughout the land
And don't criticize
What you can't understand
Your sons and your daughters
Are beyond your command
Your old road is
Rapidly agin'.
Please get out of the new one
If you can't lend your hand
For the times they are a-changin'.

The line it is drawn
The curse it is cast
The slow one now
Will later be fast
As the present now
Will later be past
The order is
Rapidly fadin'.
And the first one now
Will later be last
For the times they are a-changin'.
 

Ru-fi-o

Banned via Administration
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
114
Location
Off the top of FD
You put too much faith into matchup numbers my friend.

Matchup difficulty is subjective in some cases and not a lot of people pay attention to this. Leepuff claims the GnW/MK matchup to be 50/50, but not every GnW player (top or not) says the same thing; The same applies to Atomsk's claim on the DDD/MK matchup being 50/50. This is nothing more than their own personal comfort with the matchup, which proves that matchup numbers are ultimately irrelevant unless it is visually clear that one character is totally outclassed by another, which in the case of MK vs. the majority of the cast is valid. Why is it that a lot of the best players (Ally, M2K, etc.) don't sit in these threads and cherry-pick others' arguments while preaching matchup numbers as much as a lot of players on the lower end of the spectrum do, if at all?

Can you recall when you last saw Azen, a player with extensive personal knowledge on several characters, pay a visit to a thread like this to discuss such a subjective topic like anything regarding matchup numbers? Exactly, he doesn't, and yet he is still one of the handful of players at the top who are dealing with the matchups. He and other players who "walk the walk" learn the ins-and-outs of matchups. They aren't stuck playing these silly little number games with a side of theorycrafting.



This guy just said: Get. ****ing. *****.
 

Overswarm

is laughing at you
Joined
May 4, 2005
Messages
21,181
edit the lyrics for The Times They Are A Changing I will even make a video for it and everything.

Quick edit for the lyrics
Come gather 'round smashers
Wherever you roam
And admit that the metagame
Around has stagnated
And accept it that soon
You'll be maining MK.
If your time to you
Is worth savin'
Then you better start voting
Or you'll sink like a low tier
For the times they are a-changin'.

Come backroomers and To's
Who prophesize with your posts
And keep your eyes wide
The chance won't come again
And don't speak too soon
For the wheel's still in spin
And there's no tellin' who
That it's namin'.
For the losers now
Will be later to win
For the times they are a-changin'.


that is all i have, rest of the lyrics
Come senators, congressmen
Please heed the call
Don't stand in the doorway
Don't block up the hall
For he that gets hurt
Will be he who has stalled
There's a battle outside
And it is ragin'.
It'll soon shake your windows
And rattle your walls
For the times they are a-changin'.

Come mothers and fathers
Throughout the land
And don't criticize
What you can't understand
Your sons and your daughters
Are beyond your command
Your old road is
Rapidly agin'.
Please get out of the new one
If you can't lend your hand
For the times they are a-changin'.

The line it is drawn
The curse it is cast
The slow one now
Will later be fast
As the present now
Will later be past
The order is
Rapidly fadin'.
And the first one now
Will later be last
For the times they are a-changin'.
It will be done.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom