When I said how you were going to smash temples as a giant, I was simply talking about in-game. You said the developers wouldn't want you to go smashing through the temples, because it would ruin the game. The temples wouldn't get smashed in the same way hacking your sword at a tree wouldn't cause damage to the tree.
That's what I don't agree with, you're going with game limitation logic instead of common sense, so the trees in the game don't get cuts, that doesn't mean trees in in the series are impervious to sword strike, I'm sure if there was a cutscene or a need to cut a tree down with a sword it would happen.
But by your logic it is not possible, i do not agree with your approach with this, I vote for common sense, if Link slashes at a tree, the trees gonna get cut, instead of your logic, which would be that since Link cannot cut any part of a tree that DK could hide behind a bunch of branches and Link would never be able to approach him, this is not an efficent way to go about this, it creates too many questionable limitations
Link can't even lift a Bomb without the Goron Bracelet.
That's Kid Link foo, and even he has been shown to move large rock in MM without any bracelet and same thing with bombs, there so Link has different abilities in 2 games with the exact same person, so what are you gonna do about this, how about we take the best of what each character has instead of putting stupid limitations on them
Then Samus wins. Metroid: Zero Mission and Metroid Fusion Instruction Booklets say Samus runs at supersonic speeds with the Speed Booster. Those speeds are between Mach 1 and Mach 4.9. Mach 5 is hypersonic speed. In the Super Metroid Instruction Booklet, it says Samus is invincible when she uses the Speed Booster. Link cannot do anything about this, because Samus is moving too quick for Link anyway.
If she truly can run at those speeds then I agree Link is ****ed, slowing time down would do the trick via Farore's Wind + Inverted Song of Time but that's only if she doens't use this ability right away
Link has arrows. At best, modern arrows fly at 187 mph.
And here I thought you were still using game logic instead of real world logic
, in OOT the arrows Link shoots hit targets very far away pretty much instantaneously so we should use that as reference
, I believe it also goes to the sun to get the fire arrow within seconds, super speed arrows FTW
Then I guess Link cannot defeat Samus. His sword has trouble piercing through armor or shields. What is Samus wearing? Armor. I guess she won't take damage from the Master Sword. I mean, let's stop adding a bit of realism here, even though we both are adding realism by allowing the characters to do things they are otherwise incapable of doing. Or should Link still be incapable of jumping without Roc's Cape?
How about no switching between the two just to support your argument, pick one, I vote realism with events that are more theory because they were never doable in a game
Like Samus' grappble beam, you could only use it on specified objects, not everything so Link's shield wouldn't be grappable, this is a game limitation set to balance the game just like the Giant's Mask, you can't set one to be ok but not the other, it has to be yes for all or no for all, let's use some realistic sense saying she can grapple whatever she wants, then we must also say Link can use the masks wherever he wants
Not agreeing to that is just being a douchebag trying to cheaply add more advantages to one character to make them win making this a laughable attempt at a tier list
BTW Link has shown to be able to strip armor off Darknuts and Iron Knuckles with his sword so he could strip Samus'
I love the irony here. A spirit leaving a body once the body dies is called an "afterlife." Saying this spirit then dwells in another body when a hero is needed is just plain reincarnation. Both views are religious views. So, I laugh at you for ignoring the religious and philosophical things, even though the Zelda series is guilty for having a dualistic mythology of light versus dark (Zoroastrianism; Manichaeism), has three gods (tritheism or trinitarianism?), has Fierce Deity, another god (perhaps polytheism?), and Ganondorf is resurrected.
I meant let's not argue about religious views themselves, not how they apply to the game
When you're losing, resort to insulting other peoples' intelligence! Please prove it.
Claiming victory is ignorance, I already gave you the info, if you choose not to believe it then oh well
Please prove that Shigeru Miyamoto meant what you're saying. Please prove that it's the same Link in a different body.
By that, I meant he cannot mean what you're saying because that would contradict the in-game evidence, game evidence>what developer's say is true, can't change what's there no matter what, so it's more like even if he didn't mean that, it doesn't matter
Nintendo has officially stated there is no timeline to Zelda, yet miyamoto has said there is, contradiction, this is why you ignore these people and look to the game only
http://www.zeldauniverse.net/zelda-news/there-is-no-timeline/
Doesn't matter. Prove reincarnation is involved. And don't call me Dippy. You may call your 12 year old brother whatever you want, but I am not your 12 year old brother. Do not call me Dippy or any other name.
But it's so funny, I could but fine I'll have at least that much respect for you
Explain what else it could be when it involves same soul different body
It calls him the Hero of Time.
It says that he is the ancient hero of legend, I would suppose that these deities having been watching over hyrule would know who he is so who else would they be referencing, so you're doubting their knowledge despite having shown much about the history of hyrule? That is futile
Hey, guess what? You weren't here when all these pages were around, and when we had at least 100 pages of Samus versus Link. Guess what? It was not every incarnation of Link combined into one. This has already been established, newcomer.
So which Link is it then, if the TC agreed to this and established it, why is it not in the OP? Not listing all the rules does not help, if the TC has agreed that only 1 version of Link is to be used then fine, but that is mighty gay, just take Link off this list then or put at the very bottom immediately because people against Link can just choose his weakest version and say the character they support would win, what a cheap method
One more thing though, with playing songs to slow time or use nayru's love which has startup time, how is it you get to decide what the character would do, maybe they would just sit there and laugh at Link playing a song, you see this is why I say you list what is possible for them to do rather than what you think they would do, which is why I say Link would dodge grapple beam, you apply certain rules to one character and not the other, how can you go about this and think it reasonable?
It's not, plain and simple, I vote reason, you obviously do not.
