Maybe he considers a Car a Topic, while he considers Vans, Trucks, etc. as SubTopics.lolwut
a van is a vehicle, does that make a van a car?
your logic has confused me.
I dunno.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Maybe he considers a Car a Topic, while he considers Vans, Trucks, etc. as SubTopics.lolwut
a van is a vehicle, does that make a van a car?
your logic has confused me.
Averaging is the way to go. Baseball players have averages about how good they are at bat. So why not this? If you want to get technical about it, if you use Charizard and Ivysaur most of the time, PT is a low tier, if you use Squirtle most of the time, Pokemon Trainer would be middle mid tier, if you use Squirtle 100% of the time, PT is high mid tier. It's also the reason why I counted each pokemon independantly.havent we been over this? all three pokemon used equally is really bad.
if you want to be accurate, you should say pokemon trainer used correctly, instead of equally.
and CC, what makes you put sonic below the three characters that he is above in the current sbr list? (shiek, lucas and ness) im curious.
No, that doesn't mean he is unbeatable, it means he is the best character in this game. I put numbers in there so you can tell how far apart they really are in usefulness.A 10.0 character? Unbeatable?
When a baseball player goes up to bat (for the example lets say each dude gets 3 at bats per game) they dont use wood for one at bat, aluminum for the 2nd and hollow plastic for the third.Averaging is the way to go. Baseball players have averages about how good they are at bat. So why not this? If you want to get technical about it, if you use Charizard and Ivysaur most of the time, PT is a low tier, if you use Squirtle most of the time, Pokemon Trainer would be middle mid tier, if you use Squirtle 100% of the time, PT is high mid tier. It's also the reason why I counted each pokemon independantly.
Ness, Lucas and Shiek... they have more options than Sonic. More gimping potential than Sonic, better kill options. The only things Sonic really have over those 3 are speed, and recovery. Also, Shaky placed 13th using Ness 100% at Winterfest, a national tournament in Florida. I don't think even the best Sonic can get that high, if the best Sonic did come to Winterfest, the highest I can see him place is 17th. I say this because most of the people that have participated at that tournament, go to tournaments a lot and are all well known. For a ness player to place that high in such an big enviroment filled with pros, that says something about how underated Ness is... as well as Lucas, they don't deserve to be in low tier if they place that high. Middle tier characters are able to sneak in there like Shaky has. Although I'm sure most people would agree with me, that Shiek is a better character than Sonic.
Squirtle is top tier if you have hacks to just use him IMOif you use Squirtle 100% of the time, PT is high mid tier.
This made me lol. I may just Sig this. Granted Ivysaur is probably the equivalent of using a cattle prod. It will hit really hard when it does, but its like bringing a knife to a gun fight. You'll also feel like it was luck that allowed you to hit that ball.When a baseball player goes up to bat (for the example lets say each dude gets 3 at bats per game) they dont use wood for one at bat, aluminum for the 2nd and hollow plastic for the third.
Until you face Marth and he kills you with the grab release chain grab into spike. Plus you must deal with his speed + infinitely better range.Squirtle is top tier if you have hacks to just use him IMO
Actually shaky did have a marth.Shaky got 13th, but should he have? From a player perspective, probably. From a character perspective, hell no. Throw 2 decent/good Marth players in his Bracket and I guarantee you he won't get 13th if only because of his character's flaws.
When you play a lower tier character with a hard counter like Marth is to Ness, the odds are severely stacked against you. This doesn't mean that they will 100% be stacked against you, as that would assume that everyone would play said hard counter decently enough. Obviously this isn't the case, so characters like Ness and Sonic are given "chances" to do well because although they aren't amazing as characters, their hard counters were mostly absent from the tournament. Ness is still pretty much low tier, he just has good days where Marth isn't hiding around every corner.
One bad matchup shouldn't be that influential, if it were then Marth should be mid tier too for what MK does to him, Falco's S tier and IC's **** him up etc.Until you face Marth and he kills you with the grab release chain grab into spike. Plus you must deal with his speed + infinitely better range.
this ^^^^One bad matchup shouldn't be that influential, if it were then Marth should be mid tier too for what MK does to him, Falco's S tier and IC's **** him up etc.
I'd question just how bad that really is though, Squirtle isn't exactly easy to grab to begin with.
I love Charizards pokes. If only his jab true-combo'd.This made me lol. I may just Sig this. Granted Ivysaur is probably the equivalent of using a cattle prod. It will hit really hard when it does, but its like bringing a knife to a gun fight. You'll also feel like it was luck that allowed you to hit that ball.
And Zard isn't as bad as people give him credit for. A couple respected PT mains suggest he may be better than Squirtle at the highest level of play. Space one move incorrectly and you might eat a sweet 65% from a Rocksmash>Usmash combo.
Then we can simply ignore how some characters are ruined by other characters, and then throw out hybridization out the window and call it day.One bad matchup shouldn't be that influential, if it were then Marth should be mid tier too for what MK does to him, Falco's S tier and IC's **** him up etc.
Not really.PROMETHEUS!Cause I like Chrono Cross, and it's a cooler name.
Anyway, lifeline ftw! First time I ever got the developer's room ending on first playthrough I abused that tech so hard.
Yea, so Robo + Marle + Chrono = god tier.
Crisis arm craps on you.^^ no, you fail for keeping Robo in your party
lol
You're FORCED to switch pokemon when you die.Averaging is the way to go. Baseball players have averages about how good they are at bat. So why not this? If you want to get technical about it, if you use Charizard and Ivysaur most of the time, PT is a low tier, if you use Squirtle most of the time, Pokemon Trainer would be middle mid tier, if you use Squirtle 100% of the time, PT is high mid tier. It's also the reason why I counted each pokemon independantly.
Ness, Lucas and Shiek... they have more options than Sonic.
No not really. being able to recover from pretty much everywhere allows him more flexibility than most.More gimping potential than Sonic,
I'm questioning this as well.Why is it that people think Metaknight devours Marth?
Marth loses to him, but he doesn't have it lower than 60:40.
Unless you're Sonic, who has like, 4:6's across the entire ****ing board above low tier.40:60 match-ups are not even that bad. >_>
Shaya's got it right, playing against MK is a tough match because you have to play your absolute best and then some the entire setMarth vs Meta Knight is a lot more mentally taxing for the Marth than any other match up he has to play with.
Marth v Meta Knight is probably like X vs Ice Climbers. Or better yet, Ice Climbers v Snake.
For ICs to win (and Ally/Swordgard are saying it's even...) they have to be technically proficient in all ways because of the 'natural' disadvantage they have. Their mistakes cost them badly. But ICs have all the tools necessary to win.
The match up is not a matter of Marth can't do anything to MK, this isn't true at all, Marth has options for everyone of MK's 'things', and compared to other characters, a ****ton of them. The way to win is just more taxing to the player throughout a set.
So that may sound Super Theory Bros. to you, but technical aspects (I call it technical, blow me) become natural to players over time. The thing is, that the spacing war between the characters actually slightly favours Marth (spacing 'safely'). MK ***** Marth in bad positions, but Marth wins in aerial combat (however things like MK's dair can stop Marth from getting into the air in the first place).
Also Marth loses to planking MK.
Just like every other character.
Individually they're crap. But Lifeline is an amazing insurance policy, and it's essential if you wanna get developer's room ending on your first play throughNot really.
Marle is crap.
Frog is a bit better.
You want Luca or Magus or even better, Ayla. Ayla is AWESOME.
HEY!Shaya's got it right, playing against MK is a tough match because you have to play your absolute best and then some the entire set