Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
LETS GOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!Yes. Because helmetz is wrong.
<3mahmanz!!
read tha **** me p-3 and redblue wrote75-25 / 70-30
You are mistaken.Wait, Darx. Didn't you tell me a few pages back it's stupid to compare match-ups?
As Red would say, get your act together woman.
And Acedude is now mah boi.
You could've edited your last post instead of double posting.i love how scrubby is cheap shotting me though
its totally awesome on his part
no cause if i edit you would be like "lol edit minus 3 credibility"You could've edited your last post instead of double posting.
at this point i don't care what you post it as darky,Regardless, nine-tenths of THIS board are wifi players. A good seven-tenths of this community in general is wifi players. Everything gets nerfed on wifi, but if a person knows their timing in the .25 second lag time, then it's possible to play properly. Just because it's wifi doesn't mean something ISN'T going to come out.
If offline only is your verdict, than we might as well not even have a match-up guide up for discussion. Just talk about our ideas and leave the ratios for offline players to decide.
I am agreeing with you though, online, characters aren't guaranteed the performance as they would be given offline. The 20:80 ratio still seems about right to me, but I don't see 25:75 pushing it either.
Speaking of, you need to do quite a bit of updating, don't ya?We've been going down the tier list for match-up discussions. Speaking of, I need to reorder the guide to fit the new Tier List format too. Bah.
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLWe should discuss Ike.
he gives me more trouble than marth, but that may be cause i know alot of the marth mu, while i know nothing of the ike Mu. lol
also, I powershield on wifi, take that *****es
Ike's is better but Falcon's is more versatile.Also, if you try to counterattack a spaced fair on ike, you will get a jab to the face.
also, it's kinda hard to explain which jab is better due to the fact that falcon an ike place such a heavy focus of there jabs.
Ike's reach>falcon's reach.Falcon's got stuff on Ike, honestly I wouldn't exactly be shocked if Falcon actually won this matchup.
I mean honestly...you do actually have a better Jab than he does (gentleman cancel is more **** than his Jab cancel in terms of damage, and your Jab -> grab >>>>> his), and Ike really only has like two moves that can really hit you legitimately if you don't get tricked and play with good reaction time. He can spam a lot of Jabs and his B-air is pretty quick, but he really can't set up into anything, and powershielding of course destroys him.
Run circles around him, play carefully, and Falcon's better zoning options and combos and SAFE kill moves should do the work for you. I won't say the matchup is easy, but Falcon does have more options.
Double Jump? Airdodge?Ikes utilt is actually decent anti air actually
^Ike's reach>falcon's reach.
A good/perfectly spacing ike>a good/perfectly spacing falcon.
That, plus ike's more rewarding moves when they connect (more damage), make this matchup:
60-40. Ike's advantage.
Falcon's versatility and speed make up for other possible advantages ike has over falcon.
Thus, 60-40. Ike's advantage.
Yeah you canYou cant airdodge it, since it has a long lasting hitbox.