Wakka beat you and you didn't camp him soooo..uhhhhh...
What do you think I'll do next time? Last time I played Wakka I 3 stocked him. I was pretty tired, hadn't practiced, he got a lucky barrel spike on the first match, johns, johns, johns, but none of it explains how it switches from a 3 stock last time I saw him to a victory now.... except he improved!
So next time I'll camp him.
Unless it's Gaying your opponent to death with Shuttle Loop spam. Pretty much anything else is legit.
There is no unless. Ever.
If you find a technique that allows you to u-throw with metaknight and throw off a u-air during the grab at the very peak, thus having a 0-death grab at any % that is easy to do... GO WIN POUND. No warning either, **** their **** up.
lol, thats what I thought when I read that. The same strategy has also contributed to Falco's victories. But Falco is not a bad character, right now I'd put money on Larry beating any MK over 50% of the time sans M2K.
No, Falco is bad. I am unimpressed by any victory Larry gets unless there is no anti-planking rule. If he came here and played me, I wouldn't even get a % lead. I'd just immediately grab the ledge and tell him knock knock jokes until he killed himself IRL.
Falco needs these rules to really succeed, so... meh.
(Larry is obviously very skilled though, I'm just spouting off hyperbole to make a point for all you literalists out there)
M2k planks like a beast, because he lacks the ability to not get grabbed by meep.
More like because it's because it's the best way to not get grabbed. M2K can win, he just chooses the best and safest option. To do otherwise puts you in second place. That's like ICs saying "I just use CGs because I lack the ability to get KOs vs MK otherwise". Doesn't make any sense.