Good news Everyone! I caught up!
So here's my opinions, and I'll go in depth later why I think what is what:
First off, I completely agree with Scamp. People twisted his words to an extreme. He never said OS was scum for asking questions, but the way I read it, Scamp was leery of the way OS would demean himself. To me, I would think that OS would be very confident in this sort of game. A newbie question is a newbie question, but to go out of your way on several occasions to say "But I'm a newbie, what do I know." is playing the noob card and I don't feel it's something that OS would do.
Hilt is town.
Scamp is town-ish.
McFox is scum.
As far as what I think about Kevin claiming miller. Yes, technically it makes sense that a townie would claim miller, but usually I would be under the assumption that miller would not know they were miller. So I have questions. Some people mentioned there was indeed a miller from the first TMNT. Did *that* miller know they were miller? Also, I'm astonished that no one asked for a character claim from KevinM, especially considering the-man mentioned character claiming himself. Does it not make sense to anyone to ask KevinM for a character claim? I know my character makes perfect sense for my role. tHe-man seems confident his own character claim would help prove his role. Since he role claimed, a character claim to back it up certainly seems reasonable. So, KevinM, would you be willing to character claim? I think it would help us sort that bit out.
Dastrn looks really, really bad to me.
And in my experience, Millers don't know they are Millers.
This is my experience as well.
Not going to claim my role, but I also have a voting restriction. If I hammer scum, I lose my PR. Yeah, it sucks.
That's a really weird/crappy vote restriction.
Overswarm, each Night, the Mafia can kill one of us. If we reveal everyone's role, they can decide which of us to kill first, and which to leave until later on. Granted, a Miller claim probably isn't going to be targeted for a Night kill, but the reason it is scummy is because it's not likely to be a lynch target either.
Why wouldn't a miller claim be targeted for a night kill if we believed his claim?
Gheb, I'm trying to see it but I still don't understand what caused you to vote for Kirby. Kevin (a experienced mafia player) just made a day 1 claim that he will turn up guilty even if he's not. Having just played a game with Kevin I'm more inclined to think that he's lying.
Why were you inclined to think he was lying? You answered this, but I'd like a more thorough explanation. Was KevinM scum the game you played with him?
What would people think about a no lynch?
I want people to answer that, with why or why not.
However I would REALLY like Kirbyo to answer first, followed by preferably Gheb.
The order after that is of little to no importance to me.
Wow. No lynch? Really? Why did you suggest this? Even lynching a lurker d1 is better than a no lynch, don't you agree?
My vote for now is on Scamp. He's been backpedaling, which he'll probably say is a sign of not being scum, but it just highlights how he was posting without the pressure. All those votes meant something to all of us when we made them, and if he truly believed anything he was posting previously, he should have stuck to it. Scum will ALWAYS cave to the pressure of votes when all eyes are on them. Town, not as much.
I don't agree with this. I could see town crumbling just by seeing "Hey, no one agrees with me. Maybe I'm wrong about this person. I guess I should look elsewhere." Also, people were kind of misinterpreting what Scamp was saying.
OS looks kinda bad to me cause he was like "oh, I don't knoooow. I think this but what do I know?" and when Scamp calls him out on it, he's suddenly pulling out statistics on how many times people have posted, and saying we should lynch lurkers and the like. So yeah. Don't see why Scamp was so scummy.
I would go McFox or Dastrn toDay. I agree with Kevin, I REALLY don't like how McFox has been playing this game.