#HBC | Nabe
Beneath it all, he had H-cups all along
156 where he says "but I still don't like it" is begrudging. The final admitting came on in 172. 156 and 168 are him holding onto T-block despite knowing my point was valid. 172 came about after I simply restated what I had already said about T-block; apparently it was a better point the second time around.
Wii don't see it and wii find it stranger that you insisted on invalidating us [#157] when it's clear nothing of the sort really did happen and it was mere disagreement. In other words it looked like you invented this point. Could you enlighten us?
SK, do you think Nich could've been calling dumb or scum on T-block for the sake of being demoralizing and defacing? (DaD henceforth) I ask because I know this is your first game with Nich and thus I shouldn't get meta.
To be honest here, i think Nich is the less scummy of the latter, Night-discussion is a no-no and even though Nich is apologizing for his actions (which is AtE) it's not as bad as what T-block has done.
Furthermore, the meta here is out of wack for T-block too, i would expect T-block to take a more subtle approach to the game, but instead he releases with a balls-to-the-wall idea that doesn't make sense, while it's great to think of the box, it's something you shouldn't think about.
Balls-to-the-wall?
He talked about time travel mechanics and the potential for night action discussion to have a larger impact. That's not radical.
It's still a no-no, that's speculation and on top of it is a bit of fishing, Night actions pertain to PR's, just as mechanics pertain to them also.
Nothing of the sort. T-block raised a scenario about a vig as an example of how the mechanics are different. It's not dangerous to be mindful of the mechanics (certainly not scummy either) and as he said, roles will play a part and discussion of them. I would go a step further and say that'll happen earlier rather than later.
Alright, i see your point Nabe, but i still don't like it.
You don't like it? I don't think that's a valid option since what I said pretty much invalidates the reasoning that came with your vote.
That's the invalidation. He "sees the point" but the point I'm making is that he's wrong. If he sees the point, he should "like it" i.e. drop his point. He doesn't -- a few posts later, Soup continues to argue about "rolefishing".
This post [100] is what i was referring to, i looked at it before i jumped off, when you mentioned the Vig point, i looked back and saw it and felt it held good merit but doesn't erase this one.
What's scummy about this post? It's not apparent.
@Nabe
Have you not been reading what i have been saying? it's night discussion, simple as that, there is no reason to talk about it until it comes up, it's fishing, i don't care if you clarify what you meant but there was no point to bring it up at all, and the discussion it generates would be justifiably null too, just like talking about mechanics are.
This post is the same thing I said in my prior explanation. I haven't changed any of my reasoning.@SK: What T-block said isn't fishing. Period. I'm not suggesting it's a town tell but it's not scummy by any stretch. If he spent the rest of the game playing Advice Dog and Mechanic Moose, then yeah, scummy. But it was fair to say what he did, and he let go of it without posting further.
But now he accepts it. What changed?Fair enough, i have other reasons to beileve T-block is scum still though.
I later corrected myself, in that none of your posts have been memorable and as such I feel that your posting has been sparse. Many of your posts were small as well iirc or "nothing posts" which is what I originally meant by sparse, but by and large it's just nothing memorable from your slot.really what we're interested in is why you decided to ignore a large majority of our posts on your reread as being sparse
Townies can hold different views. In some cases someone is wrong and another person is right. I disagree with some of that post but that has nothing to do with the alignment of the post, it's still null.and why you read my large post as nothing but......."null", nothing more, when there were clear thought processes you could have questioned in greater knowledge to reassure yourself wii are scum, especially considering there were points you disagreed with there i.e. our analysis on nich vs degrey etc.!
In 631, I was in the middle of catching up. My vote for Nich was in 654 right after finishing my catchup, where I did exactly what you're saying I should've in 631.O, also #631
^*****footer you For someone that agreed "vehemently" with Reyth and that Nich was scum, why didn't you paint the Town red here with your vote? Wii can be Mr.Picky too and look closer at the point you agreed on with Degrey where you stated, "straight from the mouth of kings", there would be no repercussions on lynching Nich... as a result of this agreement why didn't you put your money to your mouth here and go for Nich seeing as a) he's vehemently scum and b) he should be easier to lynch with no repercussions? That's a perfect combination. Maybe you shouldn't be invited to discoglamslam
X1 wasn't goading at all, he was expressing a truth. What Nich said was just as true, but he used it as a means to call X1 a hypocrite. Hypocrisy doesn't make one's point less valid, it just makes them guilty of the same.Also sidenote: there was something odd wii noticed with one of your points at the end of this post - that being stuff surrounding FE Mafia and Nich's exchanges with Zen and .Jpeg... the .Jpeg one in particular showed no sensitivity to both parties ---> i.e. I clicked on that link to reveal .Jpeg saying something that could be interpreted as goading Nich, and yet you implied Nich was dismissive for no reason other than to be dismissive. Why was this a detail youskippednoticed?