Banks
Smash Hero
the biggest diff is pokemon stadium not being neutral. if thats ur problem, then that sucks. but not much else is different unless you LOVE corneria and green greens. and everyone hates them.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yeah, people complain when you change things nonetheless if its for the better entirely (:It's too late to argue, you must accept it!
Change won't hurt anyone. Adapt!
Edit: This just proves a point that I had in mind. Humans don't like to change and they want to stay in their comfort zone... Pretty pathetic.
Is that sarcasm or are you just being overly zealous? =pThis just proves a point that I had in mind. Humans don't like to change and they want to stay in their comfort zone... Pretty pathetic.
Did you really ask me that question? I'm probably someone who doesn't know sarcasm exists lol.Is that sarcasm or are you just being overly zealous? =p
ROOOOFL@this post on so many levels. sorry lovage, thats just too funny XDehhh this ruleset is godlike for sheik
and sucks for fox LOL. now fox only has one very good stage which is going to be autobanned so all we can counterpick are rainbow cruise...and neutrals which don't have any real fox advantage only personal preference
i guess we'll see what happens
But not true lol.Even as a fox main I'm implementing these rules at my tournament tomorrow. Hopefully if your right lovage more people will start johning about how sheiks the best instead of fox. Which would be a welcome change.
yo plank love ya buddy but.......The ending date is set for Jan 1st. Has been for a while.
The poll didn't even have an option of the set I'm using now, and SWF polls are infamously useless due to people who will never show to tournies voting.
This is the most commonly agreed upon ruleset thus far in the back room (not official yet) and at the same time what I agree with. Since there's a lot of international attendance and they're ALREADY adapting to our version of smash (ntsc) I'd rather not make them play ludicrous random levels and lose the tournament that way.
No, I meant have an earlier ending date for the poll you would tie registration (that was one of my suggestions).The ending date is set for Jan 1st. Has been for a while.
Agreed, but rather then tossing aside the "will of the people" option, from a PR standpoint it's better to instead have a more useful poll, and as I suggested, tieing it to registration (with a mass email to the already registered sent to allow them to take the poll as well) is probably the most efficient option.The poll didn't even have an option of the set I'm using now, and SWF polls are infamously useless due to people who will never show to tournies voting.
I'm not saying your reasoning isn't sound, I'm taking this from the Public Relations prospective.This is the most commonly agreed upon ruleset thus far in the back room (not official yet) and at the same time what I agree with. Since there's a lot of international attendance and they're ALREADY adapting to our version of smash (ntsc) I'd rather not make them play ludicrous random levels and lose the tournament that way.
Sub 10 percent is still quite significant, but if you're not concerned about those people, then I guess that's your prerogative.the attendance won't drop because of this, definitely not significantly at least. id say ive gotten about 90% positive feedback 10% negative. people just feel the need to post complaints and continue beating them into the ground. human nature.
Well I do adapt and cope with change by playing on pokemon stadium. The design of the level changes throughout the match. Why don't you follow your own advice. =DIt's too late to argue, you must accept it!
Change won't hurt anyone. Adapt!
Edit: This just proves a point that I had in mind. Humans don't like to change and they want to stay in their comfort zone... Pretty pathetic.
Understand, this isn't commenting on the RESULT, this is the I'm sorry, from the outside prospective, the way that you did it DID look arbitrary, your choice, then poll, then your choice again. And that's the real sticking point, again from a PR prospective it LOOKS bad. Same decision made using a different method wouldn't have had anywhere near the backlash.10% is a high number, but of these 10% maybe 1% of them will not come because of the changes.
The choice wasn't "arbitrary". Stop acting like there aren't very obvious grounds for my statements. You're acting like I said "Alright guys, FALCO IS BANNED AT POUND 4".
And no, i'm not going to change the rules to appease to a very very small number of players. The entire point is to make the -most- people happy, and if the large majority of people are happy, that's fine with me.
Even if people have little qualms with specific stages being banned or PS being not neutral, almost everyone still agrees this is more competitive and fair. If you're a fox player PS was gonna get stage struck anyway, I don't know why it's so upsetting.
Lol.. I will. I never really had any troubles playing stadium vs any character, I never ban it.Well I do adapt and cope with change by playing on pokemon stadium. The design of the level changes throughout the match. Why don't you follow your own advice. =D